Would you do SEA if you didn't have to?: reflections on acceptance or rejection of the SEA process

Elsa João, Anna McLauchlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is undertaken in more than 60 countries worldwide. Support to the SEA process can range from formal legal requirements to voluntary ‘ad hoc’ approaches. In the cases where SEA is legally required, such as in Europe where the SEA Directive sets a framework for SEA legislation in 28 countries, practitioners may engage with SEA but in a reluctant way. This paper reports on a unique survey of 203 key people responsible for implementing the SEA legislative requirement in Scotland. The majority (53%) of the 187 practitioners who answered the hypothetical question ‘If SEA was not compulsory, would you do it?’ said ‘Yes’. However, results suggest that the responses were much nuanced. Practitioners were asked to explicate their reasoning and, irrespective of whether the answer was ‘yes’ or ‘no’, common themes were evident in accompanying remarks. This paper enables reflection on reasons for acceptance or rejection of the SEA process by discussing: the perception that a similar process to SEA is already being done, the problem with lack of resources, the call for a ‘leaner process’ and the difficulties of undertaking SEA when conditions are already determined at a higher ‘tier’.
LanguageEnglish
Pages87-97
Number of pages11
JournalImpact Assessment and Project Appraisal
Volume32
Issue number2
Early online date4 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

strategic environmental assessment
acceptance
legislation

Keywords

  • attitudes towards SEA
  • practitioners
  • resources
  • leaner impact assessment
  • tiering

Cite this

@article{53e0f4c5041c4272ae66585a8fe82c43,
title = "Would you do SEA if you didn't have to?: reflections on acceptance or rejection of the SEA process",
abstract = "Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is undertaken in more than 60 countries worldwide. Support to the SEA process can range from formal legal requirements to voluntary ‘ad hoc’ approaches. In the cases where SEA is legally required, such as in Europe where the SEA Directive sets a framework for SEA legislation in 28 countries, practitioners may engage with SEA but in a reluctant way. This paper reports on a unique survey of 203 key people responsible for implementing the SEA legislative requirement in Scotland. The majority (53{\%}) of the 187 practitioners who answered the hypothetical question ‘If SEA was not compulsory, would you do it?’ said ‘Yes’. However, results suggest that the responses were much nuanced. Practitioners were asked to explicate their reasoning and, irrespective of whether the answer was ‘yes’ or ‘no’, common themes were evident in accompanying remarks. This paper enables reflection on reasons for acceptance or rejection of the SEA process by discussing: the perception that a similar process to SEA is already being done, the problem with lack of resources, the call for a ‘leaner process’ and the difficulties of undertaking SEA when conditions are already determined at a higher ‘tier’.",
keywords = "attitudes towards SEA, practitioners, resources, leaner impact assessment, tiering",
author = "Elsa Jo{\~a}o and Anna McLauchlan",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/14615517.2014.889265",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "87--97",
journal = "Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal",
issn = "1461-5517",
number = "2",

}

Would you do SEA if you didn't have to? reflections on acceptance or rejection of the SEA process. / João, Elsa; McLauchlan, Anna.

In: Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2014, p. 87-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Would you do SEA if you didn't have to?

T2 - Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

AU - João, Elsa

AU - McLauchlan, Anna

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is undertaken in more than 60 countries worldwide. Support to the SEA process can range from formal legal requirements to voluntary ‘ad hoc’ approaches. In the cases where SEA is legally required, such as in Europe where the SEA Directive sets a framework for SEA legislation in 28 countries, practitioners may engage with SEA but in a reluctant way. This paper reports on a unique survey of 203 key people responsible for implementing the SEA legislative requirement in Scotland. The majority (53%) of the 187 practitioners who answered the hypothetical question ‘If SEA was not compulsory, would you do it?’ said ‘Yes’. However, results suggest that the responses were much nuanced. Practitioners were asked to explicate their reasoning and, irrespective of whether the answer was ‘yes’ or ‘no’, common themes were evident in accompanying remarks. This paper enables reflection on reasons for acceptance or rejection of the SEA process by discussing: the perception that a similar process to SEA is already being done, the problem with lack of resources, the call for a ‘leaner process’ and the difficulties of undertaking SEA when conditions are already determined at a higher ‘tier’.

AB - Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is undertaken in more than 60 countries worldwide. Support to the SEA process can range from formal legal requirements to voluntary ‘ad hoc’ approaches. In the cases where SEA is legally required, such as in Europe where the SEA Directive sets a framework for SEA legislation in 28 countries, practitioners may engage with SEA but in a reluctant way. This paper reports on a unique survey of 203 key people responsible for implementing the SEA legislative requirement in Scotland. The majority (53%) of the 187 practitioners who answered the hypothetical question ‘If SEA was not compulsory, would you do it?’ said ‘Yes’. However, results suggest that the responses were much nuanced. Practitioners were asked to explicate their reasoning and, irrespective of whether the answer was ‘yes’ or ‘no’, common themes were evident in accompanying remarks. This paper enables reflection on reasons for acceptance or rejection of the SEA process by discussing: the perception that a similar process to SEA is already being done, the problem with lack of resources, the call for a ‘leaner process’ and the difficulties of undertaking SEA when conditions are already determined at a higher ‘tier’.

KW - attitudes towards SEA

KW - practitioners

KW - resources

KW - leaner impact assessment

KW - tiering

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tiap20

U2 - 10.1080/14615517.2014.889265

DO - 10.1080/14615517.2014.889265

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 87

EP - 97

JO - Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

JF - Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

SN - 1461-5517

IS - 2

ER -