Workers, marginalised voices and the employment tribunal system: some preliminary findings

Nicole Busby, Morag McDermont

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper reports on pilot study research which sought to explore perceptions and experiences of vulnerable employees who attempted to use the Employment Tribunal (ET) system to resolve disputes. We interviewed clients of a Citizens Advice Bureau seeking to explore the concerns of those for whom the system potentially poses the greatest barriers—those who cannot afford legal advice and/or are not trade union members. We conclude that the ETs, and the mediating role played by Acas, produce barriers to justice for vulnerable employees. Furthermore, the role played by Citizens Advice is critical in reclaiming labour law’s public law function, by which private disputes between individuals are translated into matters of public concern.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-183
Number of pages18
JournalIndustrial Law Journal
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • dispute resolution
  • employment tribunal system
  • mediation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Workers, marginalised voices and the employment tribunal system: some preliminary findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this