Why Do Some Africans Pay Bribes While Other Africans Don’t?

Caryn Peiffer, Richard Rose

Research output: Working paper

59 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Generalizations about African societies being pervasively corrupt are refuted in this innovative paper. Among 25,397 Afrobarometer respondents in 18 countries, 26% report paying a bribe, while 74% do not. Five hypotheses offer explanations: institutional context, inequalities of socio-economic resources, social inclusion and exclusion, social and political capital, and conflicting norms. Multilevel statistical analysis identifies as most important: contextual differences in colonial legacies, ethnic politicization, service provision, press freedom, and having social or political capital. The analysis emphasizes studying behavior rather than perceptions of corruption and supports a public-policy focus on bribery as an exchange for specific public services.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages29
Volume148
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014

Publication series

NameAfrobarometer Working Papers

Fingerprint

corruption
multi-level analysis
politicization
statistical analysis
public service
public policy
exclusion
inclusion
society
resources
economics

Keywords

  • African public officials
  • bribery in African states
  • social capital
  • political capital

Cite this

Peiffer, C., & Rose, R. (2014). Why Do Some Africans Pay Bribes While Other Africans Don’t? (Afrobarometer Working Papers).
Peiffer, Caryn ; Rose, Richard. / Why Do Some Africans Pay Bribes While Other Africans Don’t?. 2014. (Afrobarometer Working Papers).
@techreport{87539c9ce18946338a78789b5ffc9173,
title = "Why Do Some Africans Pay Bribes While Other Africans Don’t?",
abstract = "Generalizations about African societies being pervasively corrupt are refuted in this innovative paper. Among 25,397 Afrobarometer respondents in 18 countries, 26{\%} report paying a bribe, while 74{\%} do not. Five hypotheses offer explanations: institutional context, inequalities of socio-economic resources, social inclusion and exclusion, social and political capital, and conflicting norms. Multilevel statistical analysis identifies as most important: contextual differences in colonial legacies, ethnic politicization, service provision, press freedom, and having social or political capital. The analysis emphasizes studying behavior rather than perceptions of corruption and supports a public-policy focus on bribery as an exchange for specific public services.",
keywords = "African public officials, bribery in African states, social capital, political capital",
author = "Caryn Peiffer and Richard Rose",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "148",
series = "Afrobarometer Working Papers",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Peiffer, C & Rose, R 2014 'Why Do Some Africans Pay Bribes While Other Africans Don’t?' Afrobarometer Working Papers.

Why Do Some Africans Pay Bribes While Other Africans Don’t? / Peiffer, Caryn; Rose, Richard.

2014. (Afrobarometer Working Papers).

Research output: Working paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Why Do Some Africans Pay Bribes While Other Africans Don’t?

AU - Peiffer, Caryn

AU - Rose, Richard

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - Generalizations about African societies being pervasively corrupt are refuted in this innovative paper. Among 25,397 Afrobarometer respondents in 18 countries, 26% report paying a bribe, while 74% do not. Five hypotheses offer explanations: institutional context, inequalities of socio-economic resources, social inclusion and exclusion, social and political capital, and conflicting norms. Multilevel statistical analysis identifies as most important: contextual differences in colonial legacies, ethnic politicization, service provision, press freedom, and having social or political capital. The analysis emphasizes studying behavior rather than perceptions of corruption and supports a public-policy focus on bribery as an exchange for specific public services.

AB - Generalizations about African societies being pervasively corrupt are refuted in this innovative paper. Among 25,397 Afrobarometer respondents in 18 countries, 26% report paying a bribe, while 74% do not. Five hypotheses offer explanations: institutional context, inequalities of socio-economic resources, social inclusion and exclusion, social and political capital, and conflicting norms. Multilevel statistical analysis identifies as most important: contextual differences in colonial legacies, ethnic politicization, service provision, press freedom, and having social or political capital. The analysis emphasizes studying behavior rather than perceptions of corruption and supports a public-policy focus on bribery as an exchange for specific public services.

KW - African public officials

KW - bribery in African states

KW - social capital

KW - political capital

UR - http://www.afrobarometer.org/publications/working-papers/item/1490-why-do-some-africans-pay-bribes-while-other-africans-don-t

M3 - Working paper

VL - 148

T3 - Afrobarometer Working Papers

BT - Why Do Some Africans Pay Bribes While Other Africans Don’t?

ER -

Peiffer C, Rose R. Why Do Some Africans Pay Bribes While Other Africans Don’t? 2014 Sep. (Afrobarometer Working Papers).