Whose view prevails?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Examines Scottish case law on: (1) the enforceability of child contact orders where a parent's behaviour results in them being held in contempt of court, or more severely, as in the case of Re M (Intractable Contact Dispute: Interim Care Order), raises concerns about whether the child should remain in their care; (2) the difficulty in determining whether, in a case where a child under 16 is involved in sexual activity, they are a criminal or victim; and (3) the petitions to include Scotland as a jurisdiction which allows same-sex marriages to take place.
LanguageEnglish
Pages18-19
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of the Law Society of Scotland
Volume54
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

contact
petition
case law
jurisdiction
parents
marriage

Keywords

  • family law
  • children's welfare
  • contempt of court
  • marriage
  • parental contact
  • Scotland

Cite this

@article{126e0cc2c31b4cea848acee2545423f7,
title = "Whose view prevails?",
abstract = "Examines Scottish case law on: (1) the enforceability of child contact orders where a parent's behaviour results in them being held in contempt of court, or more severely, as in the case of Re M (Intractable Contact Dispute: Interim Care Order), raises concerns about whether the child should remain in their care; (2) the difficulty in determining whether, in a case where a child under 16 is involved in sexual activity, they are a criminal or victim; and (3) the petitions to include Scotland as a jurisdiction which allows same-sex marriages to take place.",
keywords = "family law, children's welfare, contempt of court, marriage, parental contact, Scotland",
author = "Kenneth Norrie",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "18--19",
journal = "Journal of the Law Society of Scotland",
issn = "0458-8711",
number = "7",

}

Whose view prevails? / Norrie, Kenneth.

In: Journal of the Law Society of Scotland, Vol. 54, No. 7, 2009, p. 18-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whose view prevails?

AU - Norrie, Kenneth

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Examines Scottish case law on: (1) the enforceability of child contact orders where a parent's behaviour results in them being held in contempt of court, or more severely, as in the case of Re M (Intractable Contact Dispute: Interim Care Order), raises concerns about whether the child should remain in their care; (2) the difficulty in determining whether, in a case where a child under 16 is involved in sexual activity, they are a criminal or victim; and (3) the petitions to include Scotland as a jurisdiction which allows same-sex marriages to take place.

AB - Examines Scottish case law on: (1) the enforceability of child contact orders where a parent's behaviour results in them being held in contempt of court, or more severely, as in the case of Re M (Intractable Contact Dispute: Interim Care Order), raises concerns about whether the child should remain in their care; (2) the difficulty in determining whether, in a case where a child under 16 is involved in sexual activity, they are a criminal or victim; and (3) the petitions to include Scotland as a jurisdiction which allows same-sex marriages to take place.

KW - family law

KW - children's welfare

KW - contempt of court

KW - marriage

KW - parental contact

KW - Scotland

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 18

EP - 19

JO - Journal of the Law Society of Scotland

T2 - Journal of the Law Society of Scotland

JF - Journal of the Law Society of Scotland

SN - 0458-8711

IS - 7

ER -