Who's afraid of secularisation? Reframing the debate between Gearon and Jackson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines the debate between Liam Gearon and Robert Jackson concerning the politicisation of religious education. The debate concerns the extent to which secularisation frames religious education by inculcating politically motivated commitments to tolerance, respect, and human rights. Gearon is critical of a supposed ‘counter-secularisation’ narrative that, he argues, underpins a major international research project into the contribution of religious education known as REDCo (Religion in Education. A Contribution to Dialogue or a Factor of Conflict in Transforming Societies of European Countries), suggesting that the politicising assumptions behind the project extend rather than counter secularisation. Although Jackson’s rejoinder to Gearon is robust and largely accurate, I suggest that it misses the basic challenge that religious education serves political ends. I argue that both Gearon and Jackson are enframed at a more fundamental level by a particular notion of religious identity. The problem of pluralism is not, as Gearon supposes, a consequence of the secular framing of religion in terms of tolerance and respect, but predicated on a propositional view of religion that places competing truth claims in opposition. Nothing less than a transformed view of religion itself is the presupposition and the aim of religious education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-461
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Studies
Volume65
Issue number4
Early online date16 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

secularization
religious education
Religion
tolerance
respect
politicization
pluralism
opposition
human rights
research project
dialogue
Secularization
Religious Education
Reframing
commitment
narrative
society
education
Tolerance

Keywords

  • religious studies
  • education
  • secularisation
  • atheism
  • theology
  • divinity
  • philosophical considerations
  • pluralism

Cite this

@article{546f67242e7d4d8d8a05f9f8e6b3bd67,
title = "Who's afraid of secularisation? Reframing the debate between Gearon and Jackson",
abstract = "This paper examines the debate between Liam Gearon and Robert Jackson concerning the politicisation of religious education. The debate concerns the extent to which secularisation frames religious education by inculcating politically motivated commitments to tolerance, respect, and human rights. Gearon is critical of a supposed ‘counter-secularisation’ narrative that, he argues, underpins a major international research project into the contribution of religious education known as REDCo (Religion in Education. A Contribution to Dialogue or a Factor of Conflict in Transforming Societies of European Countries), suggesting that the politicising assumptions behind the project extend rather than counter secularisation. Although Jackson’s rejoinder to Gearon is robust and largely accurate, I suggest that it misses the basic challenge that religious education serves political ends. I argue that both Gearon and Jackson are enframed at a more fundamental level by a particular notion of religious identity. The problem of pluralism is not, as Gearon supposes, a consequence of the secular framing of religion in terms of tolerance and respect, but predicated on a propositional view of religion that places competing truth claims in opposition. Nothing less than a transformed view of religion itself is the presupposition and the aim of religious education.",
keywords = "religious studies, education, secularisation, atheism, theology, divinity, philosophical considerations, pluralism",
author = "David Lewin",
note = "The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in British Journal of Educational Studies 2017 http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00071005.2017.1305182",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1080/00071005.2017.1305182",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "445--461",
journal = "British Journal of Educational Studies",
issn = "0007-1005",
number = "4",

}

Who's afraid of secularisation? Reframing the debate between Gearon and Jackson. / Lewin, David.

In: British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 65, No. 4, 16.03.2017, p. 445-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who's afraid of secularisation? Reframing the debate between Gearon and Jackson

AU - Lewin, David

N1 - The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available in British Journal of Educational Studies 2017 http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00071005.2017.1305182

PY - 2017/3/16

Y1 - 2017/3/16

N2 - This paper examines the debate between Liam Gearon and Robert Jackson concerning the politicisation of religious education. The debate concerns the extent to which secularisation frames religious education by inculcating politically motivated commitments to tolerance, respect, and human rights. Gearon is critical of a supposed ‘counter-secularisation’ narrative that, he argues, underpins a major international research project into the contribution of religious education known as REDCo (Religion in Education. A Contribution to Dialogue or a Factor of Conflict in Transforming Societies of European Countries), suggesting that the politicising assumptions behind the project extend rather than counter secularisation. Although Jackson’s rejoinder to Gearon is robust and largely accurate, I suggest that it misses the basic challenge that religious education serves political ends. I argue that both Gearon and Jackson are enframed at a more fundamental level by a particular notion of religious identity. The problem of pluralism is not, as Gearon supposes, a consequence of the secular framing of religion in terms of tolerance and respect, but predicated on a propositional view of religion that places competing truth claims in opposition. Nothing less than a transformed view of religion itself is the presupposition and the aim of religious education.

AB - This paper examines the debate between Liam Gearon and Robert Jackson concerning the politicisation of religious education. The debate concerns the extent to which secularisation frames religious education by inculcating politically motivated commitments to tolerance, respect, and human rights. Gearon is critical of a supposed ‘counter-secularisation’ narrative that, he argues, underpins a major international research project into the contribution of religious education known as REDCo (Religion in Education. A Contribution to Dialogue or a Factor of Conflict in Transforming Societies of European Countries), suggesting that the politicising assumptions behind the project extend rather than counter secularisation. Although Jackson’s rejoinder to Gearon is robust and largely accurate, I suggest that it misses the basic challenge that religious education serves political ends. I argue that both Gearon and Jackson are enframed at a more fundamental level by a particular notion of religious identity. The problem of pluralism is not, as Gearon supposes, a consequence of the secular framing of religion in terms of tolerance and respect, but predicated on a propositional view of religion that places competing truth claims in opposition. Nothing less than a transformed view of religion itself is the presupposition and the aim of religious education.

KW - religious studies

KW - education

KW - secularisation

KW - atheism

KW - theology

KW - divinity

KW - philosophical considerations

KW - pluralism

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rbje20/current

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015617664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00071005.2017.1305182

DO - 10.1080/00071005.2017.1305182

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 445

EP - 461

JO - British Journal of Educational Studies

JF - British Journal of Educational Studies

SN - 0007-1005

IS - 4

ER -