Who represents us best? one member or many?

J.K. Curtice, W. Phillips Shively

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Citizens living in presidential or parliamentary systems face different political choices as do voters casting votes in elections governed by rules of proportional representation or plurality. Political commentators seem to know how such rules influence political behavior. They firmly believe, for example, that candidates running in plurality systems are better known and held more accountable to their constituencies than candidates competing in elections governed by proportional representation. However, such assertions rest on shaky ground simply because solid empirical knowledge to evaluate the impact of political institutions on individual political behavior is still lacking. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems has collected data on political institutions and on individual political behavior and scrutinized it carefully. In line with common wisdom results of most analyses presented in this volume confirm that political institutions matter for individual political behavior but, contrary to what is widely believed, they do not matter much
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe comparative study of electoral systems
EditorsHans-Dieter Klingemann
Place of PublicationOxford University Press
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages171-192
Number of pages22
ISBN (Print)0199217351
Publication statusPublished - 5 Feb 2009

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • elections
  • cross-cultural studies
  • representative government
  • voting
  • political parties
  • candidates

Cite this

Curtice, J. K., & Phillips Shively, W. (2009). Who represents us best? one member or many? In H-D. Klingemann (Ed.), The comparative study of electoral systems (pp. 171-192). Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press.