Where fact makes law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Compares the Scottish and New Zealand regimes on financial provision after unmarried couples have separated. Explains the differences in approach to the rights of cohabitants under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 and the factors taken into account to determine whether cohabitants qualify as de facto relationships under New Zealand's Property (Relationships) Act 1976, illustrated by case law. Considers the relevance of sexual activity, the use and ownership of property and how the relationship was perceived by the parties.
LanguageEnglish
Pages18-19
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of the Law Society of Scotland
Volume54
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

New Zealand
act
family law
Law
case law
regime

Keywords

  • comparative law
  • family law
  • financial provision
  • New Zealand
  • Scotland
  • separation
  • unmarried couples

Cite this

@article{8252e17c1bbc41b1a15243868da543ff,
title = "Where fact makes law",
abstract = "Compares the Scottish and New Zealand regimes on financial provision after unmarried couples have separated. Explains the differences in approach to the rights of cohabitants under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 and the factors taken into account to determine whether cohabitants qualify as de facto relationships under New Zealand's Property (Relationships) Act 1976, illustrated by case law. Considers the relevance of sexual activity, the use and ownership of property and how the relationship was perceived by the parties.",
keywords = "comparative law, family law, financial provision, New Zealand, Scotland, separation, unmarried couples",
author = "Kenneth Norrie",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "18--19",
journal = "Journal of the Law Society of Scotland",
issn = "0458-8711",
number = "5",

}

Where fact makes law. / Norrie, Kenneth.

In: Journal of the Law Society of Scotland, Vol. 54, No. 5, 2009, p. 18-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where fact makes law

AU - Norrie, Kenneth

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Compares the Scottish and New Zealand regimes on financial provision after unmarried couples have separated. Explains the differences in approach to the rights of cohabitants under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 and the factors taken into account to determine whether cohabitants qualify as de facto relationships under New Zealand's Property (Relationships) Act 1976, illustrated by case law. Considers the relevance of sexual activity, the use and ownership of property and how the relationship was perceived by the parties.

AB - Compares the Scottish and New Zealand regimes on financial provision after unmarried couples have separated. Explains the differences in approach to the rights of cohabitants under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006 and the factors taken into account to determine whether cohabitants qualify as de facto relationships under New Zealand's Property (Relationships) Act 1976, illustrated by case law. Considers the relevance of sexual activity, the use and ownership of property and how the relationship was perceived by the parties.

KW - comparative law

KW - family law

KW - financial provision

KW - New Zealand

KW - Scotland

KW - separation

KW - unmarried couples

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 18

EP - 19

JO - Journal of the Law Society of Scotland

T2 - Journal of the Law Society of Scotland

JF - Journal of the Law Society of Scotland

SN - 0458-8711

IS - 5

ER -