Where everyday mobility meets tourism: an age-friendly perspective on cycling in the Netherlands and the UK

Wilbert den Hoed

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
23 Downloads (Pure)


Tourism is traditionally presented as an escape from daily life and located at places we do not normally visit. Against a backdrop of problematic pressures on (urban) tourist centres and mobility systems, some scholars have explored the possibility of tourism nearer the home. Such locations, however, are often perceived too mundane or are not sufficiently equipped as tourist destinations. In addition, the study of tourist experiences is often dominated by motorised transport, and with limited consideration of older age groups. This paper combines different strands of literature to consider the role of active mobility among older people and its contribution to age-friendliness and more proximate forms of tourism. Two case studies in the contrasting mobility contexts of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom show how everyday mobility contains implicit and explicit tourism elements. Commutes, local visits, and active travel itself may act as springboards for tourism close(r) to home. Using biographical and mobile methods, this paper shows how local tourism roots in individual lifecourses, depends on the transport environment, and supports social and physical well-being. The findings provide much-needed empirical insight in the convergence of tourism and everyday mobilities, and underline the growing importance of slower and more age-friendly approaches to tourism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-203
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Sustainable Tourism
Issue number2
Early online date28 Aug 2019
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020


  • active mobility
  • well-being
  • older adults
  • tourism
  • cycling


Dive into the research topics of 'Where everyday mobility meets tourism: an age-friendly perspective on cycling in the Netherlands and the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this