Where do hands go? An audit of sequential hand-touch events on a hospital ward

S.J. Smith, V. Young, Christopher Robertson, S.J. Dancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)
149 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Reservoirs of pathogens could establish themselves at forgotten sites on
a ward, posing a continued risk for transmission to patients via unwashed hands.
To track potential spread of organisms between surfaces and patients, and to gaina greater understanding into transmission pathways of pathogens during patient care. Hand-touch activities were audited covertly for 40 30 min sessions during summer and winter, and included hand hygiene on entry; contact with near-patient sites; patient contact; contact with clinical equipment; hand hygiene on exit; and contact with sites outside the room. There were 104 entries overall: 77 clinical staff (59 nurses; 18 doctors), 21 domestic staff, one pharmacist and five relatives. Hand-hygiene compliance among clinical staff before and after entry was 25% (38/154), with higher compliance during 20 summer periods [47%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 35.6e58.8] than during 20 winter
periods (7%; 95% CI: 3.2e14.4; P < 0.0001). More than half of the staff (58%; 45/77) touched the patient. Staff were more likely to clean their hands prior to contact with a patient [odds ratio (OR): 3.44; 95% CI: 0.94e16.0); P ¼ 0.059] and sites beside the patient (OR: 6.76; 95% CI: 1.40e65.77; P ¼ 0.0067). Nearly half (48%; 37/77) handled patient notes and 25% touched the bed. Most frequently handled equipment inside the room were intravenous drip (30%) and blood pressure stand (13%), and computer (26%), notes trolley (23%) and telephone (21%) outside the room. Hand-hygiene compliance remains poor during covert observation; understanding the most frequent interactions between hands and surfaces could target sites for cleaning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-2011
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Hospital Infection
Volume80
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Touch
Hand
Hand Hygiene
Confidence Intervals
Odds Ratio
Equipment and Supplies
Infectious Disease Transmission
Pharmacists
Telephone
Intravenous Infusions
Compliance
Patient Care
Nurses
Observation
Blood Pressure

Keywords

  • audit
  • cleaning
  • clinical equipment
  • hand hygiene
  • healthcare environment
  • surveillance

Cite this

@article{50124ca16d4d42aebd147508cb823db6,
title = "Where do hands go? An audit of sequential hand-touch events on a hospital ward",
abstract = "Reservoirs of pathogens could establish themselves at forgotten sites ona ward, posing a continued risk for transmission to patients via unwashed hands.To track potential spread of organisms between surfaces and patients, and to gaina greater understanding into transmission pathways of pathogens during patient care. Hand-touch activities were audited covertly for 40 30 min sessions during summer and winter, and included hand hygiene on entry; contact with near-patient sites; patient contact; contact with clinical equipment; hand hygiene on exit; and contact with sites outside the room. There were 104 entries overall: 77 clinical staff (59 nurses; 18 doctors), 21 domestic staff, one pharmacist and five relatives. Hand-hygiene compliance among clinical staff before and after entry was 25{\%} (38/154), with higher compliance during 20 summer periods [47{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval (CI): 35.6e58.8] than during 20 winterperiods (7{\%}; 95{\%} CI: 3.2e14.4; P < 0.0001). More than half of the staff (58{\%}; 45/77) touched the patient. Staff were more likely to clean their hands prior to contact with a patient [odds ratio (OR): 3.44; 95{\%} CI: 0.94e16.0); P ¼ 0.059] and sites beside the patient (OR: 6.76; 95{\%} CI: 1.40e65.77; P ¼ 0.0067). Nearly half (48{\%}; 37/77) handled patient notes and 25{\%} touched the bed. Most frequently handled equipment inside the room were intravenous drip (30{\%}) and blood pressure stand (13{\%}), and computer (26{\%}), notes trolley (23{\%}) and telephone (21{\%}) outside the room. Hand-hygiene compliance remains poor during covert observation; understanding the most frequent interactions between hands and surfaces could target sites for cleaning.",
keywords = "audit, cleaning, clinical equipment, hand hygiene, healthcare environment, surveillance",
author = "S.J. Smith and V. Young and Christopher Robertson and S.J. Dancer",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhin.2011.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "206--2011",
journal = "Journal of Hospital Infection",
issn = "0195-6701",
number = "3",

}

Where do hands go? An audit of sequential hand-touch events on a hospital ward. / Smith, S.J.; Young, V.; Robertson, Christopher; Dancer, S.J.

In: Journal of Hospital Infection, Vol. 80, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 206-2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where do hands go? An audit of sequential hand-touch events on a hospital ward

AU - Smith, S.J.

AU - Young, V.

AU - Robertson, Christopher

AU - Dancer, S.J.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Reservoirs of pathogens could establish themselves at forgotten sites ona ward, posing a continued risk for transmission to patients via unwashed hands.To track potential spread of organisms between surfaces and patients, and to gaina greater understanding into transmission pathways of pathogens during patient care. Hand-touch activities were audited covertly for 40 30 min sessions during summer and winter, and included hand hygiene on entry; contact with near-patient sites; patient contact; contact with clinical equipment; hand hygiene on exit; and contact with sites outside the room. There were 104 entries overall: 77 clinical staff (59 nurses; 18 doctors), 21 domestic staff, one pharmacist and five relatives. Hand-hygiene compliance among clinical staff before and after entry was 25% (38/154), with higher compliance during 20 summer periods [47%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 35.6e58.8] than during 20 winterperiods (7%; 95% CI: 3.2e14.4; P < 0.0001). More than half of the staff (58%; 45/77) touched the patient. Staff were more likely to clean their hands prior to contact with a patient [odds ratio (OR): 3.44; 95% CI: 0.94e16.0); P ¼ 0.059] and sites beside the patient (OR: 6.76; 95% CI: 1.40e65.77; P ¼ 0.0067). Nearly half (48%; 37/77) handled patient notes and 25% touched the bed. Most frequently handled equipment inside the room were intravenous drip (30%) and blood pressure stand (13%), and computer (26%), notes trolley (23%) and telephone (21%) outside the room. Hand-hygiene compliance remains poor during covert observation; understanding the most frequent interactions between hands and surfaces could target sites for cleaning.

AB - Reservoirs of pathogens could establish themselves at forgotten sites ona ward, posing a continued risk for transmission to patients via unwashed hands.To track potential spread of organisms between surfaces and patients, and to gaina greater understanding into transmission pathways of pathogens during patient care. Hand-touch activities were audited covertly for 40 30 min sessions during summer and winter, and included hand hygiene on entry; contact with near-patient sites; patient contact; contact with clinical equipment; hand hygiene on exit; and contact with sites outside the room. There were 104 entries overall: 77 clinical staff (59 nurses; 18 doctors), 21 domestic staff, one pharmacist and five relatives. Hand-hygiene compliance among clinical staff before and after entry was 25% (38/154), with higher compliance during 20 summer periods [47%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 35.6e58.8] than during 20 winterperiods (7%; 95% CI: 3.2e14.4; P < 0.0001). More than half of the staff (58%; 45/77) touched the patient. Staff were more likely to clean their hands prior to contact with a patient [odds ratio (OR): 3.44; 95% CI: 0.94e16.0); P ¼ 0.059] and sites beside the patient (OR: 6.76; 95% CI: 1.40e65.77; P ¼ 0.0067). Nearly half (48%; 37/77) handled patient notes and 25% touched the bed. Most frequently handled equipment inside the room were intravenous drip (30%) and blood pressure stand (13%), and computer (26%), notes trolley (23%) and telephone (21%) outside the room. Hand-hygiene compliance remains poor during covert observation; understanding the most frequent interactions between hands and surfaces could target sites for cleaning.

KW - audit

KW - cleaning

KW - clinical equipment

KW - hand hygiene

KW - healthcare environment

KW - surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862804584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.12.007

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 206

EP - 2011

JO - Journal of Hospital Infection

JF - Journal of Hospital Infection

SN - 0195-6701

IS - 3

ER -