When there isn't a right answer: interpretation and reasoning, key skills for twenty-first century geoscience

Clare E Bond, Chris Philo, Zoe Shipton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A key challenge in university geoscience teaching is to give students the skills to cope with uncertainty. Professional geoscientists can rarely be certain of the ‘right answer’ to problems posed by most geological datasets, and reasoning through this uncertainty, being intelligently flexible in interpreting data which are limited in resolution and spatial distribution, is an important skill for students to learn. Understanding how interpretative and reasoning skills are, or might better be, developed alongside foundational geological concepts and techniques is crucial for the effective training of our future geoscientists. In the study presented here, a seismic interpretation exercise was undertaken by 36 geoscientists ranging in experience from novice to expert. During the exercise, observations were made of the approaches taken by the participants, what we term the interpretational process, and an evaluation was made of what they actually accomplished, what we term the final interpretational outcomes. From a comparison of the different experience cohorts, we show that even as a novice it is important to develop geological reasoning skills to enhance the interpretation of datasets where there is indeed no ‘right answer’.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-24
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

twenty-first century
uncertainty
university teaching
interpretation
experience
student
expert
evaluation

Keywords

  • argumentation
  • reasoning
  • earth science education
  • conceptual development
  • vocational education

Cite this

@article{4546b78f54774fe498dd61908218dd7e,
title = "When there isn't a right answer: interpretation and reasoning, key skills for twenty-first century geoscience",
abstract = "A key challenge in university geoscience teaching is to give students the skills to cope with uncertainty. Professional geoscientists can rarely be certain of the ‘right answer’ to problems posed by most geological datasets, and reasoning through this uncertainty, being intelligently flexible in interpreting data which are limited in resolution and spatial distribution, is an important skill for students to learn. Understanding how interpretative and reasoning skills are, or might better be, developed alongside foundational geological concepts and techniques is crucial for the effective training of our future geoscientists. In the study presented here, a seismic interpretation exercise was undertaken by 36 geoscientists ranging in experience from novice to expert. During the exercise, observations were made of the approaches taken by the participants, what we term the interpretational process, and an evaluation was made of what they actually accomplished, what we term the final interpretational outcomes. From a comparison of the different experience cohorts, we show that even as a novice it is important to develop geological reasoning skills to enhance the interpretation of datasets where there is indeed no ‘right answer’.",
keywords = "argumentation, reasoning, earth science education, conceptual development, vocational education",
author = "Bond, {Clare E} and Chris Philo and Zoe Shipton",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/09500691003660364",
language = "English",
pages = "1--24",
journal = "International Journal of Science Education",
issn = "0950-0693",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When there isn't a right answer

T2 - International Journal of Science Education

AU - Bond, Clare E

AU - Philo, Chris

AU - Shipton, Zoe

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - A key challenge in university geoscience teaching is to give students the skills to cope with uncertainty. Professional geoscientists can rarely be certain of the ‘right answer’ to problems posed by most geological datasets, and reasoning through this uncertainty, being intelligently flexible in interpreting data which are limited in resolution and spatial distribution, is an important skill for students to learn. Understanding how interpretative and reasoning skills are, or might better be, developed alongside foundational geological concepts and techniques is crucial for the effective training of our future geoscientists. In the study presented here, a seismic interpretation exercise was undertaken by 36 geoscientists ranging in experience from novice to expert. During the exercise, observations were made of the approaches taken by the participants, what we term the interpretational process, and an evaluation was made of what they actually accomplished, what we term the final interpretational outcomes. From a comparison of the different experience cohorts, we show that even as a novice it is important to develop geological reasoning skills to enhance the interpretation of datasets where there is indeed no ‘right answer’.

AB - A key challenge in university geoscience teaching is to give students the skills to cope with uncertainty. Professional geoscientists can rarely be certain of the ‘right answer’ to problems posed by most geological datasets, and reasoning through this uncertainty, being intelligently flexible in interpreting data which are limited in resolution and spatial distribution, is an important skill for students to learn. Understanding how interpretative and reasoning skills are, or might better be, developed alongside foundational geological concepts and techniques is crucial for the effective training of our future geoscientists. In the study presented here, a seismic interpretation exercise was undertaken by 36 geoscientists ranging in experience from novice to expert. During the exercise, observations were made of the approaches taken by the participants, what we term the interpretational process, and an evaluation was made of what they actually accomplished, what we term the final interpretational outcomes. From a comparison of the different experience cohorts, we show that even as a novice it is important to develop geological reasoning skills to enhance the interpretation of datasets where there is indeed no ‘right answer’.

KW - argumentation

KW - reasoning

KW - earth science education

KW - conceptual development

KW - vocational education

U2 - 10.1080/09500691003660364

DO - 10.1080/09500691003660364

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 24

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

SN - 0950-0693

ER -