When paying the piper gets the 'wrong' tune: the impact of fixed payments on case management, case trajectories and 'quality' in criminal defence work

C. Tata, F. Stephen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Do changes to the structure and level of legal aid payments significantly affect the trajectories of criminal cases? Do these changes make a difference to how defence lawyers handle cases, how they negotiate with prosecutors and how clients are advised to plead? In recent years, Scotland has made major changes to the remuneration structures for criminal defence work. This paper reports on a research study examining the impact of one of these changes: the move to 'fixed payments'. It seeks to contribute to international knowledge about the relationship between legal aid payment regimes and criminal case trajectories. Furthermore, are there any important consequences for clients, or, are changes simply absorbed by lawyers, or neutralised by other developments? The paper explains that the objective of the fixed payments policy (to encourage greater 'efficiency' in the criminal process) was contradicted by other consequences, which were unexpected by the architects of the policy.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationTransforming lives
Subtitle of host publicationLaw and social process
EditorsP. Pleasence, A. Buck, N. Balmer
Place of PublicationUK
Pages186-210
Number of pages25
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

case management
lawyer
legal aid
remuneration
architect
regime
efficiency

Keywords

  • legal aid
  • crime
  • social law
  • justice

Cite this

Tata, C., & Stephen, F. (2007). When paying the piper gets the 'wrong' tune: the impact of fixed payments on case management, case trajectories and 'quality' in criminal defence work. In P. Pleasence, A. Buck, & N. Balmer (Eds.), Transforming lives: Law and social process (pp. 186-210). UK.
Tata, C. ; Stephen, F. / When paying the piper gets the 'wrong' tune : the impact of fixed payments on case management, case trajectories and 'quality' in criminal defence work. Transforming lives: Law and social process. editor / P. Pleasence ; A. Buck ; N. Balmer. UK, 2007. pp. 186-210
@inbook{e1a107459ea241928d74ae07f553925e,
title = "When paying the piper gets the 'wrong' tune: the impact of fixed payments on case management, case trajectories and 'quality' in criminal defence work",
abstract = "Do changes to the structure and level of legal aid payments significantly affect the trajectories of criminal cases? Do these changes make a difference to how defence lawyers handle cases, how they negotiate with prosecutors and how clients are advised to plead? In recent years, Scotland has made major changes to the remuneration structures for criminal defence work. This paper reports on a research study examining the impact of one of these changes: the move to 'fixed payments'. It seeks to contribute to international knowledge about the relationship between legal aid payment regimes and criminal case trajectories. Furthermore, are there any important consequences for clients, or, are changes simply absorbed by lawyers, or neutralised by other developments? The paper explains that the objective of the fixed payments policy (to encourage greater 'efficiency' in the criminal process) was contradicted by other consequences, which were unexpected by the architects of the policy.",
keywords = "legal aid, crime, social law, justice",
author = "C. Tata and F. Stephen",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780117021464",
pages = "186--210",
editor = "P. Pleasence and A. Buck and N. Balmer",
booktitle = "Transforming lives",

}

Tata, C & Stephen, F 2007, When paying the piper gets the 'wrong' tune: the impact of fixed payments on case management, case trajectories and 'quality' in criminal defence work. in P Pleasence, A Buck & N Balmer (eds), Transforming lives: Law and social process. UK, pp. 186-210.

When paying the piper gets the 'wrong' tune : the impact of fixed payments on case management, case trajectories and 'quality' in criminal defence work. / Tata, C.; Stephen, F.

Transforming lives: Law and social process. ed. / P. Pleasence; A. Buck; N. Balmer. UK, 2007. p. 186-210.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - When paying the piper gets the 'wrong' tune

T2 - the impact of fixed payments on case management, case trajectories and 'quality' in criminal defence work

AU - Tata, C.

AU - Stephen, F.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Do changes to the structure and level of legal aid payments significantly affect the trajectories of criminal cases? Do these changes make a difference to how defence lawyers handle cases, how they negotiate with prosecutors and how clients are advised to plead? In recent years, Scotland has made major changes to the remuneration structures for criminal defence work. This paper reports on a research study examining the impact of one of these changes: the move to 'fixed payments'. It seeks to contribute to international knowledge about the relationship between legal aid payment regimes and criminal case trajectories. Furthermore, are there any important consequences for clients, or, are changes simply absorbed by lawyers, or neutralised by other developments? The paper explains that the objective of the fixed payments policy (to encourage greater 'efficiency' in the criminal process) was contradicted by other consequences, which were unexpected by the architects of the policy.

AB - Do changes to the structure and level of legal aid payments significantly affect the trajectories of criminal cases? Do these changes make a difference to how defence lawyers handle cases, how they negotiate with prosecutors and how clients are advised to plead? In recent years, Scotland has made major changes to the remuneration structures for criminal defence work. This paper reports on a research study examining the impact of one of these changes: the move to 'fixed payments'. It seeks to contribute to international knowledge about the relationship between legal aid payment regimes and criminal case trajectories. Furthermore, are there any important consequences for clients, or, are changes simply absorbed by lawyers, or neutralised by other developments? The paper explains that the objective of the fixed payments policy (to encourage greater 'efficiency' in the criminal process) was contradicted by other consequences, which were unexpected by the architects of the policy.

KW - legal aid

KW - crime

KW - social law

KW - justice

UR - http://www.lsrc.org.uk/publications/2006abstracts.pdf

UR - http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SsdIK6W7xs8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22Transforming+Lives:+Law+and+Social+Process&source=bl&ots=yfWCMgWw8N&sig=oYbm9a1Y0rx160cMffPBWPYn1aw&hl=en&ei=BK5rTc6UJc6yhAe9rOWXBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780117021464

SP - 186

EP - 210

BT - Transforming lives

A2 - Pleasence, P.

A2 - Buck, A.

A2 - Balmer, N.

CY - UK

ER -

Tata C, Stephen F. When paying the piper gets the 'wrong' tune: the impact of fixed payments on case management, case trajectories and 'quality' in criminal defence work. In Pleasence P, Buck A, Balmer N, editors, Transforming lives: Law and social process. UK. 2007. p. 186-210