When good design intentions do (not) meet users’ expectations

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Abstract

To explain their work to others, architects typically develop statements that clarify their design philosophy, intentions and the imperatives by which they pursued their design tasks. In many cases however, these statements fail to reflect or address a major component - that is PEOPLE or USERS. They are basically written - and the project still on paper - to highlight the merits of the design while illustrating the skills of the designer or the design team as manifested in the final articulation of the building(s), the built form. In generic terms, architects in these statements emphasize their complete awareness of cultural, environmental, and perhaps economic constraints, but USERS are always in the shadow taking a back seat. If they are addressed, it is only in superficial terms. As this argument may be seen by some architects and designers as arbitrary or too general, I reflect here on Qatar University Campus in terms of what were the design philosophy and intentions as stated by its architect and how USERS comprehend it, see it, and actually use it.
LanguageEnglish
Pages104-111
Number of pages8
No.107
Specialist publicationMagaz Magazine
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Seats
Economics

Keywords

  • design intentions
  • design expectation
  • Qatar University campus

Cite this

@misc{b20a35706fa543dda21a420b65cdf92c,
title = "When good design intentions do (not) meet users’ expectations",
abstract = "To explain their work to others, architects typically develop statements that clarify their design philosophy, intentions and the imperatives by which they pursued their design tasks. In many cases however, these statements fail to reflect or address a major component - that is PEOPLE or USERS. They are basically written - and the project still on paper - to highlight the merits of the design while illustrating the skills of the designer or the design team as manifested in the final articulation of the building(s), the built form. In generic terms, architects in these statements emphasize their complete awareness of cultural, environmental, and perhaps economic constraints, but USERS are always in the shadow taking a back seat. If they are addressed, it is only in superficial terms. As this argument may be seen by some architects and designers as arbitrary or too general, I reflect here on Qatar University Campus in terms of what were the design philosophy and intentions as stated by its architect and how USERS comprehend it, see it, and actually use it.",
keywords = "design intentions, design expectation, Qatar University campus",
author = "Salama, {Ashraf M}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
language = "English",
pages = "104--111",
journal = "Magaz Magazine",

}

When good design intentions do (not) meet users’ expectations. / Salama, Ashraf M.

In: Magaz Magazine, No. 107, 03.2009, p. 104-111.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

TY - GEN

T1 - When good design intentions do (not) meet users’ expectations

AU - Salama, Ashraf M

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - To explain their work to others, architects typically develop statements that clarify their design philosophy, intentions and the imperatives by which they pursued their design tasks. In many cases however, these statements fail to reflect or address a major component - that is PEOPLE or USERS. They are basically written - and the project still on paper - to highlight the merits of the design while illustrating the skills of the designer or the design team as manifested in the final articulation of the building(s), the built form. In generic terms, architects in these statements emphasize their complete awareness of cultural, environmental, and perhaps economic constraints, but USERS are always in the shadow taking a back seat. If they are addressed, it is only in superficial terms. As this argument may be seen by some architects and designers as arbitrary or too general, I reflect here on Qatar University Campus in terms of what were the design philosophy and intentions as stated by its architect and how USERS comprehend it, see it, and actually use it.

AB - To explain their work to others, architects typically develop statements that clarify their design philosophy, intentions and the imperatives by which they pursued their design tasks. In many cases however, these statements fail to reflect or address a major component - that is PEOPLE or USERS. They are basically written - and the project still on paper - to highlight the merits of the design while illustrating the skills of the designer or the design team as manifested in the final articulation of the building(s), the built form. In generic terms, architects in these statements emphasize their complete awareness of cultural, environmental, and perhaps economic constraints, but USERS are always in the shadow taking a back seat. If they are addressed, it is only in superficial terms. As this argument may be seen by some architects and designers as arbitrary or too general, I reflect here on Qatar University Campus in terms of what were the design philosophy and intentions as stated by its architect and how USERS comprehend it, see it, and actually use it.

KW - design intentions

KW - design expectation

KW - Qatar University campus

UR - http://www.magazmagazine.com/magaz2012/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=143&Itemid=181

M3 - Article

SP - 104

EP - 111

JO - Magaz Magazine

T2 - Magaz Magazine

JF - Magaz Magazine

ER -