What's the use of ethical philosophy?: the role of ethical theory in special educational needs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the relevance of modern moral philosophy to education, with particular reference to special educational needs. Where moral philosophers explore the tension between utilitarian and deontological reasoning, they often consider the balance between the rights of the individual and the benefits or costs for the majority. I argue that the debate is predicated on a false dichotomy between minority and majority which is best overcome by a return to virtue ethics. In exploring this ethical debate, I draw on a case study from Australia of a student excluded from mainstream education on the basis that inclusion will not serve the greater good of the majority of students. My intention here is not to offer practical guidance in the complex day-to-day deliberations of educators dealing with issues of inclusion, but to elaborate the structure of the present thinking about inclusion. It is hoped that an appreciation of the deeper basis of ethical reasoning will itself lead to a greater recognition of the need for exploring the ethical grounds of teaching and learning. I will argue that any dichotomy between the utilitarian happiness of the many and the deontological commitment to the rights of the individual is based on a misconception of human identity. The false choice between the many and the one rests upon the assumption that morality is fundamentally about restricting personal preferences in favour of the good of the majority, that there exists a fundamental conflict between what is good for the individual and what is good for society as a whole. This will lead me to argue that we need to reinterpret human identity as constituted by its social relations and that this reorientation is best achieved by reference to virtue ethics.
LanguageEnglish
Pages536-547
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Special Needs Education
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2014

Fingerprint

Ethical Theory
special educational needs
Ethics
moral philosophy
inclusion
Students
Education
Happiness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Teaching
Learning
happiness
deliberation
morality
Social Relations
education
student
minority
educator
commitment

Keywords

  • moral philosophy
  • inclusion
  • utilitarianism
  • deontology
  • virtue ethics

Cite this

@article{cc64ae8afd8b48c0a016530aec4b561a,
title = "What's the use of ethical philosophy?: the role of ethical theory in special educational needs",
abstract = "This article examines the relevance of modern moral philosophy to education, with particular reference to special educational needs. Where moral philosophers explore the tension between utilitarian and deontological reasoning, they often consider the balance between the rights of the individual and the benefits or costs for the majority. I argue that the debate is predicated on a false dichotomy between minority and majority which is best overcome by a return to virtue ethics. In exploring this ethical debate, I draw on a case study from Australia of a student excluded from mainstream education on the basis that inclusion will not serve the greater good of the majority of students. My intention here is not to offer practical guidance in the complex day-to-day deliberations of educators dealing with issues of inclusion, but to elaborate the structure of the present thinking about inclusion. It is hoped that an appreciation of the deeper basis of ethical reasoning will itself lead to a greater recognition of the need for exploring the ethical grounds of teaching and learning. I will argue that any dichotomy between the utilitarian happiness of the many and the deontological commitment to the rights of the individual is based on a misconception of human identity. The false choice between the many and the one rests upon the assumption that morality is fundamentally about restricting personal preferences in favour of the good of the majority, that there exists a fundamental conflict between what is good for the individual and what is good for society as a whole. This will lead me to argue that we need to reinterpret human identity as constituted by its social relations and that this reorientation is best achieved by reference to virtue ethics.",
keywords = "moral philosophy, inclusion, utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics",
author = "David Lewin",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Special Needs Education on 3 Jul 2014, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08856257.2014.933549.",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/08856257.2014.933549",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "536--547",
journal = "European Journal of Special Needs Education",
issn = "0885-6257",
number = "4",

}

What's the use of ethical philosophy? the role of ethical theory in special educational needs. / Lewin, David.

In: European Journal of Special Needs Education, Vol. 29, No. 4, 03.07.2014, p. 536-547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What's the use of ethical philosophy?

T2 - European Journal of Special Needs Education

AU - Lewin, David

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in European Journal of Special Needs Education on 3 Jul 2014, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08856257.2014.933549.

PY - 2014/7/3

Y1 - 2014/7/3

N2 - This article examines the relevance of modern moral philosophy to education, with particular reference to special educational needs. Where moral philosophers explore the tension between utilitarian and deontological reasoning, they often consider the balance between the rights of the individual and the benefits or costs for the majority. I argue that the debate is predicated on a false dichotomy between minority and majority which is best overcome by a return to virtue ethics. In exploring this ethical debate, I draw on a case study from Australia of a student excluded from mainstream education on the basis that inclusion will not serve the greater good of the majority of students. My intention here is not to offer practical guidance in the complex day-to-day deliberations of educators dealing with issues of inclusion, but to elaborate the structure of the present thinking about inclusion. It is hoped that an appreciation of the deeper basis of ethical reasoning will itself lead to a greater recognition of the need for exploring the ethical grounds of teaching and learning. I will argue that any dichotomy between the utilitarian happiness of the many and the deontological commitment to the rights of the individual is based on a misconception of human identity. The false choice between the many and the one rests upon the assumption that morality is fundamentally about restricting personal preferences in favour of the good of the majority, that there exists a fundamental conflict between what is good for the individual and what is good for society as a whole. This will lead me to argue that we need to reinterpret human identity as constituted by its social relations and that this reorientation is best achieved by reference to virtue ethics.

AB - This article examines the relevance of modern moral philosophy to education, with particular reference to special educational needs. Where moral philosophers explore the tension between utilitarian and deontological reasoning, they often consider the balance between the rights of the individual and the benefits or costs for the majority. I argue that the debate is predicated on a false dichotomy between minority and majority which is best overcome by a return to virtue ethics. In exploring this ethical debate, I draw on a case study from Australia of a student excluded from mainstream education on the basis that inclusion will not serve the greater good of the majority of students. My intention here is not to offer practical guidance in the complex day-to-day deliberations of educators dealing with issues of inclusion, but to elaborate the structure of the present thinking about inclusion. It is hoped that an appreciation of the deeper basis of ethical reasoning will itself lead to a greater recognition of the need for exploring the ethical grounds of teaching and learning. I will argue that any dichotomy between the utilitarian happiness of the many and the deontological commitment to the rights of the individual is based on a misconception of human identity. The false choice between the many and the one rests upon the assumption that morality is fundamentally about restricting personal preferences in favour of the good of the majority, that there exists a fundamental conflict between what is good for the individual and what is good for society as a whole. This will lead me to argue that we need to reinterpret human identity as constituted by its social relations and that this reorientation is best achieved by reference to virtue ethics.

KW - moral philosophy

KW - inclusion

KW - utilitarianism

KW - deontology

KW - virtue ethics

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rejs20

U2 - 10.1080/08856257.2014.933549

DO - 10.1080/08856257.2014.933549

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 536

EP - 547

JO - European Journal of Special Needs Education

JF - European Journal of Special Needs Education

SN - 0885-6257

IS - 4

ER -