What we talk about when we talk about 'local' participation in international biodiversity law: the changing scope of indigenous peoples and local communities' participation under the convention on biological diversity

Louisa Parks, Mika Schröder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the meaning of participation by indigenous peoples and local communities' in the Decisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) from the perspectives of civic and radical environmentalism. The first sees participation as key for just and effective decision-making. Radical environmentalism argues instead for fundamental transformation to address environmental crisis. The article contributes to discussions about the importance of indigenous peoples and local communities for better and more just policies, or whether a more radical approach is necessary. The research uses empirical findings to deepen our understanding of 'local' participation under the CBD and uncovers many meanings. Most describe mechanisms for participation, suggesting scope for civic environmentalism. Yet a closer look raises a range of questions, leading to suggestions for future action and research.

LanguageEnglish
Pages743-785
Number of pages43
JournalPartecipazione e Conflitto
Volume11
Issue number3
Early online date15 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

biodiversity
participation
Law
community
decision making

Keywords

  • civic environmentalism
  • convention on biological diversity
  • environmental governance
  • indigenous peoples
  • local communities
  • participation

Cite this

@article{bdee13eb110446b5be50ca38e3d6cbf8,
title = "What we talk about when we talk about 'local' participation in international biodiversity law: the changing scope of indigenous peoples and local communities' participation under the convention on biological diversity",
abstract = "This article explores the meaning of participation by indigenous peoples and local communities' in the Decisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) from the perspectives of civic and radical environmentalism. The first sees participation as key for just and effective decision-making. Radical environmentalism argues instead for fundamental transformation to address environmental crisis. The article contributes to discussions about the importance of indigenous peoples and local communities for better and more just policies, or whether a more radical approach is necessary. The research uses empirical findings to deepen our understanding of 'local' participation under the CBD and uncovers many meanings. Most describe mechanisms for participation, suggesting scope for civic environmentalism. Yet a closer look raises a range of questions, leading to suggestions for future action and research.",
keywords = "civic environmentalism, convention on biological diversity, environmental governance, indigenous peoples, local communities, participation",
author = "Louisa Parks and Mika Schr{\"o}der",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1285/i20356609v11i3p743",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "743--785",
journal = "Partecipazione e Conflitto",
issn = "1972-7623",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What we talk about when we talk about 'local' participation in international biodiversity law

T2 - Partecipazione e Conflitto

AU - Parks, Louisa

AU - Schröder, Mika

PY - 2019/2/18

Y1 - 2019/2/18

N2 - This article explores the meaning of participation by indigenous peoples and local communities' in the Decisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) from the perspectives of civic and radical environmentalism. The first sees participation as key for just and effective decision-making. Radical environmentalism argues instead for fundamental transformation to address environmental crisis. The article contributes to discussions about the importance of indigenous peoples and local communities for better and more just policies, or whether a more radical approach is necessary. The research uses empirical findings to deepen our understanding of 'local' participation under the CBD and uncovers many meanings. Most describe mechanisms for participation, suggesting scope for civic environmentalism. Yet a closer look raises a range of questions, leading to suggestions for future action and research.

AB - This article explores the meaning of participation by indigenous peoples and local communities' in the Decisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) from the perspectives of civic and radical environmentalism. The first sees participation as key for just and effective decision-making. Radical environmentalism argues instead for fundamental transformation to address environmental crisis. The article contributes to discussions about the importance of indigenous peoples and local communities for better and more just policies, or whether a more radical approach is necessary. The research uses empirical findings to deepen our understanding of 'local' participation under the CBD and uncovers many meanings. Most describe mechanisms for participation, suggesting scope for civic environmentalism. Yet a closer look raises a range of questions, leading to suggestions for future action and research.

KW - civic environmentalism

KW - convention on biological diversity

KW - environmental governance

KW - indigenous peoples

KW - local communities

KW - participation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063624559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1285/i20356609v11i3p743

DO - 10.1285/i20356609v11i3p743

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 743

EP - 785

JO - Partecipazione e Conflitto

JF - Partecipazione e Conflitto

SN - 1972-7623

IS - 3

ER -