What 'rules' in sentencing? consistency and disparity in the absence of 'rules'

C. Tata, N. Hutton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers critically the issue of consistency and disparity by examining sentencing in a jurisdiction, Scotland, which has few formal rules governing sentencing practice. First, it briefly outlines the main issues distinctive to the Scottish legal framework on sentencing and then propose reasons why interjudge sentencing disparity both might and might not be expected. It then proceeds to summarize the methodology and findings of a study, initiated by 10 individual sheriffs, to compare their custodial sentencing patterns. The implications of these findings for the roles of, nature of, and relationship between 'rules' and 'knowledge' in sentencing are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages339-364
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of the Sociology of Law
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1998

Fingerprint

jurisdiction
methodology

Keywords

  • sentencing
  • Scotland

Cite this

@article{7594685bd3954ca1b25bbc8b8a49df5e,
title = "What 'rules' in sentencing? consistency and disparity in the absence of 'rules'",
abstract = "This paper considers critically the issue of consistency and disparity by examining sentencing in a jurisdiction, Scotland, which has few formal rules governing sentencing practice. First, it briefly outlines the main issues distinctive to the Scottish legal framework on sentencing and then propose reasons why interjudge sentencing disparity both might and might not be expected. It then proceeds to summarize the methodology and findings of a study, initiated by 10 individual sheriffs, to compare their custodial sentencing patterns. The implications of these findings for the roles of, nature of, and relationship between 'rules' and 'knowledge' in sentencing are discussed.",
keywords = "sentencing, Scotland",
author = "C. Tata and N. Hutton",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1006/ijsl.1998.0070",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "339--364",
journal = "International Journal of the Sociology of Law",
issn = "0194-6595",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "3",

}

What 'rules' in sentencing? consistency and disparity in the absence of 'rules'. / Tata, C.; Hutton, N.

In: International Journal of the Sociology of Law, Vol. 26, No. 3, 09.1998, p. 339-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What 'rules' in sentencing? consistency and disparity in the absence of 'rules'

AU - Tata, C.

AU - Hutton, N.

PY - 1998/9

Y1 - 1998/9

N2 - This paper considers critically the issue of consistency and disparity by examining sentencing in a jurisdiction, Scotland, which has few formal rules governing sentencing practice. First, it briefly outlines the main issues distinctive to the Scottish legal framework on sentencing and then propose reasons why interjudge sentencing disparity both might and might not be expected. It then proceeds to summarize the methodology and findings of a study, initiated by 10 individual sheriffs, to compare their custodial sentencing patterns. The implications of these findings for the roles of, nature of, and relationship between 'rules' and 'knowledge' in sentencing are discussed.

AB - This paper considers critically the issue of consistency and disparity by examining sentencing in a jurisdiction, Scotland, which has few formal rules governing sentencing practice. First, it briefly outlines the main issues distinctive to the Scottish legal framework on sentencing and then propose reasons why interjudge sentencing disparity both might and might not be expected. It then proceeds to summarize the methodology and findings of a study, initiated by 10 individual sheriffs, to compare their custodial sentencing patterns. The implications of these findings for the roles of, nature of, and relationship between 'rules' and 'knowledge' in sentencing are discussed.

KW - sentencing

KW - Scotland

U2 - 10.1006/ijsl.1998.0070

DO - 10.1006/ijsl.1998.0070

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 339

EP - 364

JO - International Journal of the Sociology of Law

T2 - International Journal of the Sociology of Law

JF - International Journal of the Sociology of Law

SN - 0194-6595

IS - 3

ER -