What role can ‘public switching’ play in researching public perceptions of controversial issues?

Lynda Dunlop, Elizabeth A.C. Rushton, Sarah Clayton, Jane Essex, Joshua Stubbs, Maria Turkenburg-van Diepen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This short article reflects on ‘public switching’ as a methodology for research on public perspectives on potential responses to the climate crisis. There have been recent calls for early public engagement with potentially controversial science and technology. Such ‘upstream’ engagement is often conducted by those close to the science, presenting challenges associated with informing without advocating and deferral to scientists on non-scientific matters. The method we propose – public switching – involves engaging a public (here, young people) with emerging technologies through social science priming, independent research and the creation of questions which are presented to scientists and policymakers working in the field. We argue that this approach provides a mechanism for the public to connect with science and policy and to be heard, with question creation depolarising and deepening discussion. We reflect on methods of public switching, question creation and analysis, and discuss the limits and limitations of this approach.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology
Early online date30 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • questions
  • sensitivity
  • polarisation
  • climate change
  • qualitative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What role can ‘public switching’ play in researching public perceptions of controversial issues?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this