What determines the suspension of budget support?

N. Molenaers, A. Gagiano, L. Smets, S. Dellepiane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although Budget Support (BS) was not designed to push political reform in recipient countries, donors have nonetheless used it to sanction democratic regress. An econometric analysis of all BS suspensions by bilateral donors in the period 2000–11 finds that suspensions effectively do reflect downward tendencies in voice and accountability, and in level of democratic functioning. The larger the in-country BS donor group, the more suspensions. Interestingly, ideological alignment between donor and recipient and aid dependence decrease the likelihood for suspensions, while domestic donor economic growth increases it; and multilateral suspensions have the largest positive effect of all.
LanguageEnglish
Pages62-73
Number of pages12
JournalWorld Development
Volume75
Early online date25 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2015

Fingerprint

budget
political reform
sanction
accountability
econometrics
recipient
aid
economic growth
responsibility
Group
effect
alignment
analysis

Keywords

  • political conditionalities
  • sanctions
  • budget support
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Latin America

Cite this

Molenaers, N. ; Gagiano, A. ; Smets, L. ; Dellepiane, S. / What determines the suspension of budget support?. In: World Development. 2015 ; Vol. 75. pp. 62-73.
@article{0d65beb652494b48a6585aa35a87999a,
title = "What determines the suspension of budget support?",
abstract = "Although Budget Support (BS) was not designed to push political reform in recipient countries, donors have nonetheless used it to sanction democratic regress. An econometric analysis of all BS suspensions by bilateral donors in the period 2000–11 finds that suspensions effectively do reflect downward tendencies in voice and accountability, and in level of democratic functioning. The larger the in-country BS donor group, the more suspensions. Interestingly, ideological alignment between donor and recipient and aid dependence decrease the likelihood for suspensions, while domestic donor economic growth increases it; and multilateral suspensions have the largest positive effect of all.",
keywords = "political conditionalities, sanctions, budget support, Africa, Asia, Latin America",
author = "N. Molenaers and A. Gagiano and L. Smets and S. Dellepiane",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.025",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "62--73",
journal = "World Development",
issn = "0305-750X",

}

What determines the suspension of budget support? / Molenaers, N.; Gagiano, A.; Smets, L.; Dellepiane, S.

In: World Development, Vol. 75, 30.11.2015, p. 62-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What determines the suspension of budget support?

AU - Molenaers, N.

AU - Gagiano, A.

AU - Smets, L.

AU - Dellepiane, S.

PY - 2015/11/30

Y1 - 2015/11/30

N2 - Although Budget Support (BS) was not designed to push political reform in recipient countries, donors have nonetheless used it to sanction democratic regress. An econometric analysis of all BS suspensions by bilateral donors in the period 2000–11 finds that suspensions effectively do reflect downward tendencies in voice and accountability, and in level of democratic functioning. The larger the in-country BS donor group, the more suspensions. Interestingly, ideological alignment between donor and recipient and aid dependence decrease the likelihood for suspensions, while domestic donor economic growth increases it; and multilateral suspensions have the largest positive effect of all.

AB - Although Budget Support (BS) was not designed to push political reform in recipient countries, donors have nonetheless used it to sanction democratic regress. An econometric analysis of all BS suspensions by bilateral donors in the period 2000–11 finds that suspensions effectively do reflect downward tendencies in voice and accountability, and in level of democratic functioning. The larger the in-country BS donor group, the more suspensions. Interestingly, ideological alignment between donor and recipient and aid dependence decrease the likelihood for suspensions, while domestic donor economic growth increases it; and multilateral suspensions have the largest positive effect of all.

KW - political conditionalities

KW - sanctions

KW - budget support

KW - Africa

KW - Asia

KW - Latin America

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/world-development

U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.025

DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.025

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 62

EP - 73

JO - World Development

T2 - World Development

JF - World Development

SN - 0305-750X

ER -