Weak monosyllables in iambic verse and the communication of metrical form

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Generative theories of English iambic pentameter can explain the distribution of prominent syllables (strong syllables in polysyllables) but are not well suited to explaining the complementary facts about the distribution of non-prominent syllables (such as the articles). This paper shows that non-prominent syllables are regularly distributed but less regularly than prominent syllables, and suggests that these facts are not well suited to a generative metrical account. Instead, these regularities are explained by understanding the organisation of the verseline as constituting ostensive evidence for its metrical type, in keeping with the general requirement for verbal art to draw attention to its own form.
LanguageEnglish
Pages771-790
Number of pages19
JournalLingua
Volume111
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2001

Fingerprint

communication
regularity
art
evidence
Verse
Communication
Monosyllables
Generative
Art
Regularity
Iambic Pentameter
Polysyllables

Keywords

  • Generative metrics
  • Iambic pentameter
  • Implicature

Cite this

@article{4ea49feacbd349a9b825481b69cd4eac,
title = "Weak monosyllables in iambic verse and the communication of metrical form",
abstract = "Generative theories of English iambic pentameter can explain the distribution of prominent syllables (strong syllables in polysyllables) but are not well suited to explaining the complementary facts about the distribution of non-prominent syllables (such as the articles). This paper shows that non-prominent syllables are regularly distributed but less regularly than prominent syllables, and suggests that these facts are not well suited to a generative metrical account. Instead, these regularities are explained by understanding the organisation of the verseline as constituting ostensive evidence for its metrical type, in keeping with the general requirement for verbal art to draw attention to its own form.",
keywords = "Generative metrics, Iambic pentameter, Implicature",
author = "N. Fabb",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00049-8",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "771--790",
journal = "Lingua",
issn = "0024-3841",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

Weak monosyllables in iambic verse and the communication of metrical form. / Fabb, N.

In: Lingua, Vol. 111, No. 11, 02.11.2001, p. 771-790.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weak monosyllables in iambic verse and the communication of metrical form

AU - Fabb, N.

PY - 2001/11/2

Y1 - 2001/11/2

N2 - Generative theories of English iambic pentameter can explain the distribution of prominent syllables (strong syllables in polysyllables) but are not well suited to explaining the complementary facts about the distribution of non-prominent syllables (such as the articles). This paper shows that non-prominent syllables are regularly distributed but less regularly than prominent syllables, and suggests that these facts are not well suited to a generative metrical account. Instead, these regularities are explained by understanding the organisation of the verseline as constituting ostensive evidence for its metrical type, in keeping with the general requirement for verbal art to draw attention to its own form.

AB - Generative theories of English iambic pentameter can explain the distribution of prominent syllables (strong syllables in polysyllables) but are not well suited to explaining the complementary facts about the distribution of non-prominent syllables (such as the articles). This paper shows that non-prominent syllables are regularly distributed but less regularly than prominent syllables, and suggests that these facts are not well suited to a generative metrical account. Instead, these regularities are explained by understanding the organisation of the verseline as constituting ostensive evidence for its metrical type, in keeping with the general requirement for verbal art to draw attention to its own form.

KW - Generative metrics

KW - Iambic pentameter

KW - Implicature

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00049-8

U2 - 10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00049-8

DO - 10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00049-8

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 771

EP - 790

JO - Lingua

T2 - Lingua

JF - Lingua

SN - 0024-3841

IS - 11

ER -