We spend how much? Misperceptions, innumeracy, and support for the foreign aid in the United States and Great Britain

Thomas J. Scotto, Jason Reifler, David Hudson, Jennifer vanHeerde-Hudson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Majorities of citizens in high-income countries often oppose foreign aid spending. One popular explanation is that the public overestimates the percentage and amount of taxpayer funds that goes toward overseas aid. Does expressing aid flows in dollar and/or percentage terms shift public opinion toward aid? We report the results of an experiment examining differences in support for aid spending as a function of the information American and British respondents receive about foreign aid spending. In both nations, providing respondents with information about foreign aid spending as a percentage of the national budget significantly reduces support for cuts. The findings suggest that support for aid can be increased, but significant opposition to aid spending remains.
LanguageEnglish
Pages119-128
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Political Science
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date14 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

public budget
overseas
dollar
public opinion
opposition
citizen
income
experiment

Keywords

  • aid spending
  • innumeracy
  • public opinion
  • framing development communications

Cite this

@article{6cea948f1ddb4131b63a9e6bcff0d21f,
title = "We spend how much? Misperceptions, innumeracy, and support for the foreign aid in the United States and Great Britain",
abstract = "Majorities of citizens in high-income countries often oppose foreign aid spending. One popular explanation is that the public overestimates the percentage and amount of taxpayer funds that goes toward overseas aid. Does expressing aid flows in dollar and/or percentage terms shift public opinion toward aid? We report the results of an experiment examining differences in support for aid spending as a function of the information American and British respondents receive about foreign aid spending. In both nations, providing respondents with information about foreign aid spending as a percentage of the national budget significantly reduces support for cuts. The findings suggest that support for aid can be increased, but significant opposition to aid spending remains.",
keywords = "aid spending, innumeracy, public opinion, framing development communications",
author = "Scotto, {Thomas J.} and Jason Reifler and David Hudson and Jennifer vanHeerde-Hudson",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1017/XPS.2017.6",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "119--128",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Political Science",
issn = "2052-2630",
number = "2",

}

We spend how much? Misperceptions, innumeracy, and support for the foreign aid in the United States and Great Britain. / Scotto, Thomas J.; Reifler, Jason; Hudson, David; vanHeerde-Hudson, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Experimental Political Science, Vol. 4, No. 2, 14.09.2017, p. 119-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - We spend how much? Misperceptions, innumeracy, and support for the foreign aid in the United States and Great Britain

AU - Scotto, Thomas J.

AU - Reifler, Jason

AU - Hudson, David

AU - vanHeerde-Hudson, Jennifer

PY - 2017/9/14

Y1 - 2017/9/14

N2 - Majorities of citizens in high-income countries often oppose foreign aid spending. One popular explanation is that the public overestimates the percentage and amount of taxpayer funds that goes toward overseas aid. Does expressing aid flows in dollar and/or percentage terms shift public opinion toward aid? We report the results of an experiment examining differences in support for aid spending as a function of the information American and British respondents receive about foreign aid spending. In both nations, providing respondents with information about foreign aid spending as a percentage of the national budget significantly reduces support for cuts. The findings suggest that support for aid can be increased, but significant opposition to aid spending remains.

AB - Majorities of citizens in high-income countries often oppose foreign aid spending. One popular explanation is that the public overestimates the percentage and amount of taxpayer funds that goes toward overseas aid. Does expressing aid flows in dollar and/or percentage terms shift public opinion toward aid? We report the results of an experiment examining differences in support for aid spending as a function of the information American and British respondents receive about foreign aid spending. In both nations, providing respondents with information about foreign aid spending as a percentage of the national budget significantly reduces support for cuts. The findings suggest that support for aid can be increased, but significant opposition to aid spending remains.

KW - aid spending

KW - innumeracy

KW - public opinion

KW - framing development communications

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046636163&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/XPS.2017.6

DO - 10.1017/XPS.2017.6

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 119

EP - 128

JO - Journal of Experimental Political Science

T2 - Journal of Experimental Political Science

JF - Journal of Experimental Political Science

SN - 2052-2630

IS - 2

ER -