Vulgate accountability: insights from the field of football

Christine Cooper, J. Johnston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)
51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to reflect upon accountability in the field of football. It considers accountability in football and uses the recent take-over of Manchester United football club by Malcolm Glazer in order to highlight some of the accountability issues which are at stake on the field. The paper draws upon the theoretical insights provided by Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Lacan. It takes the unusual theoretical perspective through its use and fusion of the theoretical concepts of Pierre Bourdieu and Jacques Lacan. The paper finds that popular definitions of accountability are difficult to tie down, but have come to mean the provision of information and perhaps the compliance with certain codes of practice. But accountability has lost its political force. The signifier 'accountability' when applied to corporations may, on the face of it, appear to mean that the populous are being given some control, but in practice, this is not the case. The paper considers one particular episode in one club. It could be argued that this episode was unique. However, this episode serves to highlight some important structural facets of the field. The paper's focus on the popular cultural form of football is fairly unique as is its fusion of Bourdieu and Lacan.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)602-634
Number of pages33
JournalAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • vulgate
  • accountability
  • insights
  • field
  • football
  • Pierre Bourdieu
  • Jacques Lacan
  • Malcolm Glazer
  • transparency
  • motivations
  • performative power
  • management power
  • manchester united
  • management accountability

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Vulgate accountability: insights from the field of football'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this