Visualising structural barriers to interdisciplinary learning

Stephen Marshall, Scott Strachan, Deon O'Bryant, Julie Sonnenberg-Klein, Edward Coyle

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we explore the challenges faced by institutions and academic disciplines in engaging in interdisciplinary learning, emphasising the impact of curricular structures. In liberal education systems, students undergo broad "general education", allowing them to explore diverse subjects across humanities, social sciences, languages, maths, and physical sciences. Conversely, career-focused higher education often confines students to teaching from a single department, limiting exposure to interdisciplinary perspectives. This paper quantifies the inhibiting effect of this restrictive approach on interdisciplinary innovation, particularly in the context of sustainable development education. The comparison of curricular structures between US and UK institutions particularly in the context of interdisciplinary Vertically-Integrated Project (VIP) modules reveals disparities in facilitating interdisciplinary education. Structural barriers, such as rigid administrative processes, registration constraints, and limited flexibility in the curriculum, pose challenges to the implementation of interdisciplinary programs. The paper draws on the work of Sonnenberg-Klein[1] to measure interdisciplinarity in higher education, utilising metrics to showcase the number of courses students experience outside their home degree subject and the ‘distance’ of these courses from their home subject. While recognising some successes in navigating barriers to interdisciplinary education, the paper suggests larger-scale solutions, including promoting flexibility in the curriculum, encouraging engagement with external stakeholders, and advocating for students to take courses from other departments. Network diagrams comparing US and UK degree structures illustrate the differences in the integration of interdisciplinary components. Ultimately, the paper aims to address and overcome structural barriers to interdisciplinarity, particularly in the context of sustainable development education. [1] J. Sonnenberg-Klein, E. J. Coyle, and K. Saigal, “How ‘Multidisciplinary’ Is It? Measuring the Multidisciplinarity of Classes and Student Teams,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Aug. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/how-multidisciplinary-is-it-measuring-the-multidisciplinarity-of-classes-and-student-teams
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 21 Mar 2024
EventInterdisciplinary Learning and Teaching Conference - 2024 - Alan Turing Building , Manchester, United Kingdom
Duration: 21 Mar 202421 Mar 2024
https://stories.manchester.ac.uk/interdisciplinaryconference/index.html

Conference

ConferenceInterdisciplinary Learning and Teaching Conference - 2024
Abbreviated titleIDTL
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityManchester
Period21/03/2421/03/24
Internet address

Keywords

  • interdisciplinary learning
  • curricular structures
  • sustainable development education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Visualising structural barriers to interdisciplinary learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this