Visual feature binding in younger and older adults: encoding and suffix interference effects

Louise A. Brown, Elaine H. Niven, Robert H. Logie, Stephen Rhodes, Richard J. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)
126 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Three experiments investigated younger (18–25 yrs) and older (70–88 yrs) adults’ temporary memory for colour–shape combinations (binding). We focused upon estimating the magnitude of the binding cost for each age group across encoding time (Experiment 1; 900/1500 ms), presentation format (Experiment 2; simultaneous/sequential), and interference (Experiment 3; control/suffix) conditions. In Experiment 1, encoding time did not differentially influence binding in the two age groups. In Experiment 2, younger adults exhibited poorer binding performance with sequential relative to simultaneous presentation, and serial position analyses highlighted a particular age-related difficulty remembering the middle item of a series (for all memory conditions). Experiments 1–3 demonstrated small to medium binding effect sizes in older adults across all encoding conditions, with binding less accurate than shape memory. However, younger adults also displayed negative effects of binding (small to large) in two of the experiments. Even when older adults exhibited a greater suffix interference effect in Experiment 3, this was for all memory types, not just binding. We therefore conclude that there is no consistent evidence for a visual binding deficit in healthy older adults. This relative preservation contrasts with the specific and substantial deficits in visual feature binding found in several recent studies of Alzheimer's disease.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-275
Number of pages15
JournalMemory
Volume25
Issue number2
Early online date16 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • memory
  • visual binding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Visual feature binding in younger and older adults: encoding and suffix interference effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this