Abstract
This chapter develops a conceptual approach which understands sentencing as a collective practice which is generated by a number of actors, not only judges. Sentencing is seen as a series of decision making practices which are made visible in publicly available accounts. This way of seeing sentencing has significant implications for understanding conventional accounts of discretion. This chapter argues that discretion is best understood as a mode of justification based on trust in the invisible work of actors. Sentencing guidelines add a more visible, rule –based form of accountability which does not replace discretion but works alongside it as a complementary mode of justification.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Modernization of the Criminal Justice Chain and the Judicial System |
| Subtitle of host publication | New Insights on Trust, Cooperation and Human Capital |
| Editors | Annie Hondeghem, Xavier Rousseaux, Frédéric Schoenaers |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Springer London |
| Pages | 145-158 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Volume | 50 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783319258003 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Jan 2016 |
Publication series
| Name | Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Springer |
| Volume | 50 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- human capital
- sentencing
- decision making
- sentencing guidelines
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Visible and invisible sentencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver