Variations in sovereign credit quality assessments across rating agencies

P Hill, R Brooks, Robert Faff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate agency variation in credit quality assessment (Standard and Poor’s vs. Moody’s vs. Fitch) employing sovereign ratings data for 129 countries, spanning the period 1990–2006. While we find that the credit rating agencies often disagree about credit quality, it is usually confined to one or two notches on the finer scale. We find that several variables have varying importance in explaining ratings across agencies which leads us to conclude that material heterogeneity exists between them. Also, while watch and outlook procedures are generally strong predictors of rating changes relative to other public data, additional significant variables suggest that it might be possible to augment these agency data to provide better forecasts of future rating changes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1327-1343
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Banking and Finance
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Rating agencies
Quality assessment
Rating
Credit
Sovereign ratings
Predictors
Credit rating agencies

Keywords

  • credit rating
  • rating transition
  • prediction
  • information content
  • sovereign

Cite this

Hill, P ; Brooks, R ; Faff, Robert. / Variations in sovereign credit quality assessments across rating agencies. In: Journal of Banking and Finance. 2010 ; Vol. 34, No. 6. pp. 1327-1343.
@article{bd5aa89f72304191a8fb5bc271960743,
title = "Variations in sovereign credit quality assessments across rating agencies",
abstract = "We investigate agency variation in credit quality assessment (Standard and Poor’s vs. Moody’s vs. Fitch) employing sovereign ratings data for 129 countries, spanning the period 1990–2006. While we find that the credit rating agencies often disagree about credit quality, it is usually confined to one or two notches on the finer scale. We find that several variables have varying importance in explaining ratings across agencies which leads us to conclude that material heterogeneity exists between them. Also, while watch and outlook procedures are generally strong predictors of rating changes relative to other public data, additional significant variables suggest that it might be possible to augment these agency data to provide better forecasts of future rating changes.",
keywords = "credit rating, rating transition, prediction, information content, sovereign",
author = "P Hill and R Brooks and Robert Faff",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.11.028",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1327--1343",
journal = "Journal of Banking and Finance",
issn = "0378-4266",
number = "6",

}

Variations in sovereign credit quality assessments across rating agencies. / Hill, P; Brooks, R; Faff, Robert.

In: Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 34, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 1327-1343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variations in sovereign credit quality assessments across rating agencies

AU - Hill, P

AU - Brooks, R

AU - Faff, Robert

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - We investigate agency variation in credit quality assessment (Standard and Poor’s vs. Moody’s vs. Fitch) employing sovereign ratings data for 129 countries, spanning the period 1990–2006. While we find that the credit rating agencies often disagree about credit quality, it is usually confined to one or two notches on the finer scale. We find that several variables have varying importance in explaining ratings across agencies which leads us to conclude that material heterogeneity exists between them. Also, while watch and outlook procedures are generally strong predictors of rating changes relative to other public data, additional significant variables suggest that it might be possible to augment these agency data to provide better forecasts of future rating changes.

AB - We investigate agency variation in credit quality assessment (Standard and Poor’s vs. Moody’s vs. Fitch) employing sovereign ratings data for 129 countries, spanning the period 1990–2006. While we find that the credit rating agencies often disagree about credit quality, it is usually confined to one or two notches on the finer scale. We find that several variables have varying importance in explaining ratings across agencies which leads us to conclude that material heterogeneity exists between them. Also, while watch and outlook procedures are generally strong predictors of rating changes relative to other public data, additional significant variables suggest that it might be possible to augment these agency data to provide better forecasts of future rating changes.

KW - credit rating

KW - rating transition

KW - prediction

KW - information content

KW - sovereign

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.11.028

DO - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.11.028

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1327

EP - 1343

JO - Journal of Banking and Finance

T2 - Journal of Banking and Finance

JF - Journal of Banking and Finance

SN - 0378-4266

IS - 6

ER -