Valuing what clients think: standardized clients and the assessment of clinical competence

Karen Barton, Clark D. Cunningham, Gregory Todd Jones, Paul Maharg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

An international and interdisciplinary team from the Glasgow Graduate School of Law (GGSL) and the Dundee Medical School - in Scotland - and the Georgia State University College of Law (GSU) - in the United States - has undertaken an ambitious project to change the way lawyer-client communication skills are taught and assessed. Medical education in both America and Great Britain has been trans-formed by a new methodology for assessing competence in patient communication: the use of intensively-trained lay persons who present standardized patient scenarios to medical candidates and then assess the candidates’ performance. GGSL is the site for a series of pilot projects testing whether a similar methodology using standardized clients (SCs) would be as valid, reliable and cost-effective as the current GGSL approach, which is widely used by many law schools, of having client roles played by students with assessment based on law teacher review of the interview videotape. These projects culminated in January 2006 with a graded interviewing exercise that GGSL students must pass in order eventually to be eligible for a law license. Over 250 GGSL students conducted this exercise with SCs, and the SC assessments were analyzed and compared with law teachers’ evaluations of the interview videotapes. The results strongly indicated that assessment by SCs was sufficiently valid and reliable to be used for a high-stakes examination in legal education. As a direct result of this project, the way lawyer skills are taught and assessed is undergoing fundamental change not only at GGSL but elsewhere in Great Britain.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-65
Number of pages65
JournalClinical Law Review
Volume13
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2006

Fingerprint

school graduate
Law
lawyer
candidacy
school law
student
methodology
pilot project
teacher
interview
communication skills
license
education
scenario
examination
human being
communication
costs
evaluation
school

Keywords

  • lawyer-client communications
  • client roles
  • students
  • law teacher
  • lawyer skills
  • glasgow graduate school of law

Cite this

Barton, K., Cunningham, C. D., Jones, G. T., & Maharg, P. (2006). Valuing what clients think: standardized clients and the assessment of clinical competence. Clinical Law Review, 13(1), 1-65.
Barton, Karen ; Cunningham, Clark D. ; Jones, Gregory Todd ; Maharg, Paul. / Valuing what clients think : standardized clients and the assessment of clinical competence. In: Clinical Law Review. 2006 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 1-65.
@article{e3dd7c71a61e4119b12c023c4059964c,
title = "Valuing what clients think: standardized clients and the assessment of clinical competence",
abstract = "An international and interdisciplinary team from the Glasgow Graduate School of Law (GGSL) and the Dundee Medical School - in Scotland - and the Georgia State University College of Law (GSU) - in the United States - has undertaken an ambitious project to change the way lawyer-client communication skills are taught and assessed. Medical education in both America and Great Britain has been trans-formed by a new methodology for assessing competence in patient communication: the use of intensively-trained lay persons who present standardized patient scenarios to medical candidates and then assess the candidates’ performance. GGSL is the site for a series of pilot projects testing whether a similar methodology using standardized clients (SCs) would be as valid, reliable and cost-effective as the current GGSL approach, which is widely used by many law schools, of having client roles played by students with assessment based on law teacher review of the interview videotape. These projects culminated in January 2006 with a graded interviewing exercise that GGSL students must pass in order eventually to be eligible for a law license. Over 250 GGSL students conducted this exercise with SCs, and the SC assessments were analyzed and compared with law teachers’ evaluations of the interview videotapes. The results strongly indicated that assessment by SCs was sufficiently valid and reliable to be used for a high-stakes examination in legal education. As a direct result of this project, the way lawyer skills are taught and assessed is undergoing fundamental change not only at GGSL but elsewhere in Great Britain.",
keywords = "lawyer-client communications, client roles, students, law teacher, lawyer skills, glasgow graduate school of law",
author = "Karen Barton and Cunningham, {Clark D.} and Jones, {Gregory Todd} and Paul Maharg",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "30",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--65",
journal = "Clinical Law Review",
issn = "1079-1159",
number = "1",

}

Barton, K, Cunningham, CD, Jones, GT & Maharg, P 2006, 'Valuing what clients think: standardized clients and the assessment of clinical competence' Clinical Law Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1-65.

Valuing what clients think : standardized clients and the assessment of clinical competence. / Barton, Karen; Cunningham, Clark D.; Jones, Gregory Todd; Maharg, Paul.

In: Clinical Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, 30.10.2006, p. 1-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valuing what clients think

T2 - Clinical Law Review

AU - Barton, Karen

AU - Cunningham, Clark D.

AU - Jones, Gregory Todd

AU - Maharg, Paul

PY - 2006/10/30

Y1 - 2006/10/30

N2 - An international and interdisciplinary team from the Glasgow Graduate School of Law (GGSL) and the Dundee Medical School - in Scotland - and the Georgia State University College of Law (GSU) - in the United States - has undertaken an ambitious project to change the way lawyer-client communication skills are taught and assessed. Medical education in both America and Great Britain has been trans-formed by a new methodology for assessing competence in patient communication: the use of intensively-trained lay persons who present standardized patient scenarios to medical candidates and then assess the candidates’ performance. GGSL is the site for a series of pilot projects testing whether a similar methodology using standardized clients (SCs) would be as valid, reliable and cost-effective as the current GGSL approach, which is widely used by many law schools, of having client roles played by students with assessment based on law teacher review of the interview videotape. These projects culminated in January 2006 with a graded interviewing exercise that GGSL students must pass in order eventually to be eligible for a law license. Over 250 GGSL students conducted this exercise with SCs, and the SC assessments were analyzed and compared with law teachers’ evaluations of the interview videotapes. The results strongly indicated that assessment by SCs was sufficiently valid and reliable to be used for a high-stakes examination in legal education. As a direct result of this project, the way lawyer skills are taught and assessed is undergoing fundamental change not only at GGSL but elsewhere in Great Britain.

AB - An international and interdisciplinary team from the Glasgow Graduate School of Law (GGSL) and the Dundee Medical School - in Scotland - and the Georgia State University College of Law (GSU) - in the United States - has undertaken an ambitious project to change the way lawyer-client communication skills are taught and assessed. Medical education in both America and Great Britain has been trans-formed by a new methodology for assessing competence in patient communication: the use of intensively-trained lay persons who present standardized patient scenarios to medical candidates and then assess the candidates’ performance. GGSL is the site for a series of pilot projects testing whether a similar methodology using standardized clients (SCs) would be as valid, reliable and cost-effective as the current GGSL approach, which is widely used by many law schools, of having client roles played by students with assessment based on law teacher review of the interview videotape. These projects culminated in January 2006 with a graded interviewing exercise that GGSL students must pass in order eventually to be eligible for a law license. Over 250 GGSL students conducted this exercise with SCs, and the SC assessments were analyzed and compared with law teachers’ evaluations of the interview videotapes. The results strongly indicated that assessment by SCs was sufficiently valid and reliable to be used for a high-stakes examination in legal education. As a direct result of this project, the way lawyer skills are taught and assessed is undergoing fundamental change not only at GGSL but elsewhere in Great Britain.

KW - lawyer-client communications

KW - client roles

KW - students

KW - law teacher

KW - lawyer skills

KW - glasgow graduate school of law

UR - http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/clinicallawreview

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 65

JO - Clinical Law Review

JF - Clinical Law Review

SN - 1079-1159

IS - 1

ER -