Validity of simple gait related dual task tests in predicting falls in community dwelling older adults

Jennifer Muhaidat, Andrew Kerr, Jonathan J. Evans, Mark Pilling, Dawn A. Skelton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the predictive validity of simple gait-related dual-task (DT) tests in predicting falls in community-dwelling older adults. Design: A validation cohort study with 6 months' follow-up. Setting: General community. Participants: Independently ambulant community-dwelling adults (N=66) aged ≥65 years, with normal cognitive function. Sixty-two completed the follow-up. No participants required frames for walking. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Occurrence of falls in the follow-up period and performance on primary and secondary tasks of 8 DT tests and 1 triple-task (TT) test. Results: A random forest classification analysis identified the top 5 predictors of a fall as (1) absolute difference in time between the Timed Up & Go (TUG) as a single task (ST) and while carrying a cup; (2) time required to complete the walking task in the TT test; (3 and 4) walking and avoiding a moving obstacle as an ST and while carrying a cup; and (5) performing the TUG while carrying a cup. Separate bivariate logistic regression analyses showed that performance on these tasks was significantly associated with falling (P<.01). Despite the random forest analysis being a more robust approach than multivariate logistic regression, it was not clinically useful for predicting falls. Conclusions: This study identified the most important outcome measures in predicting falls using simple DT tests. The results showed that measures of change in performance were not useful in a multivariate model when compared with an "allocated all to falls" rule.

LanguageEnglish
Pages58-64
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume95
Issue number1
Early online date23 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Independent Living
Gait
Walking
Logistic Models
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Validation Studies
Task Performance and Analysis
Cognition
Cohort Studies
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • accidental falls
  • aged
  • cognition
  • gait
  • rehabilitation

Cite this

Muhaidat, Jennifer ; Kerr, Andrew ; Evans, Jonathan J. ; Pilling, Mark ; Skelton, Dawn A. / Validity of simple gait related dual task tests in predicting falls in community dwelling older adults. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2014 ; Vol. 95, No. 1. pp. 58-64.
@article{2a7019e9cc4a4f208265f8d1f3e4ebf5,
title = "Validity of simple gait related dual task tests in predicting falls in community dwelling older adults",
abstract = "Objective: To investigate the predictive validity of simple gait-related dual-task (DT) tests in predicting falls in community-dwelling older adults. Design: A validation cohort study with 6 months' follow-up. Setting: General community. Participants: Independently ambulant community-dwelling adults (N=66) aged ≥65 years, with normal cognitive function. Sixty-two completed the follow-up. No participants required frames for walking. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Occurrence of falls in the follow-up period and performance on primary and secondary tasks of 8 DT tests and 1 triple-task (TT) test. Results: A random forest classification analysis identified the top 5 predictors of a fall as (1) absolute difference in time between the Timed Up & Go (TUG) as a single task (ST) and while carrying a cup; (2) time required to complete the walking task in the TT test; (3 and 4) walking and avoiding a moving obstacle as an ST and while carrying a cup; and (5) performing the TUG while carrying a cup. Separate bivariate logistic regression analyses showed that performance on these tasks was significantly associated with falling (P<.01). Despite the random forest analysis being a more robust approach than multivariate logistic regression, it was not clinically useful for predicting falls. Conclusions: This study identified the most important outcome measures in predicting falls using simple DT tests. The results showed that measures of change in performance were not useful in a multivariate model when compared with an {"}allocated all to falls{"} rule.",
keywords = "accidental falls, aged, cognition, gait, rehabilitation",
author = "Jennifer Muhaidat and Andrew Kerr and Evans, {Jonathan J.} and Mark Pilling and Skelton, {Dawn A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.027",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "58--64",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
number = "1",

}

Validity of simple gait related dual task tests in predicting falls in community dwelling older adults. / Muhaidat, Jennifer; Kerr, Andrew; Evans, Jonathan J.; Pilling, Mark; Skelton, Dawn A.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 95, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 58-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of simple gait related dual task tests in predicting falls in community dwelling older adults

AU - Muhaidat, Jennifer

AU - Kerr, Andrew

AU - Evans, Jonathan J.

AU - Pilling, Mark

AU - Skelton, Dawn A.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objective: To investigate the predictive validity of simple gait-related dual-task (DT) tests in predicting falls in community-dwelling older adults. Design: A validation cohort study with 6 months' follow-up. Setting: General community. Participants: Independently ambulant community-dwelling adults (N=66) aged ≥65 years, with normal cognitive function. Sixty-two completed the follow-up. No participants required frames for walking. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Occurrence of falls in the follow-up period and performance on primary and secondary tasks of 8 DT tests and 1 triple-task (TT) test. Results: A random forest classification analysis identified the top 5 predictors of a fall as (1) absolute difference in time between the Timed Up & Go (TUG) as a single task (ST) and while carrying a cup; (2) time required to complete the walking task in the TT test; (3 and 4) walking and avoiding a moving obstacle as an ST and while carrying a cup; and (5) performing the TUG while carrying a cup. Separate bivariate logistic regression analyses showed that performance on these tasks was significantly associated with falling (P<.01). Despite the random forest analysis being a more robust approach than multivariate logistic regression, it was not clinically useful for predicting falls. Conclusions: This study identified the most important outcome measures in predicting falls using simple DT tests. The results showed that measures of change in performance were not useful in a multivariate model when compared with an "allocated all to falls" rule.

AB - Objective: To investigate the predictive validity of simple gait-related dual-task (DT) tests in predicting falls in community-dwelling older adults. Design: A validation cohort study with 6 months' follow-up. Setting: General community. Participants: Independently ambulant community-dwelling adults (N=66) aged ≥65 years, with normal cognitive function. Sixty-two completed the follow-up. No participants required frames for walking. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Occurrence of falls in the follow-up period and performance on primary and secondary tasks of 8 DT tests and 1 triple-task (TT) test. Results: A random forest classification analysis identified the top 5 predictors of a fall as (1) absolute difference in time between the Timed Up & Go (TUG) as a single task (ST) and while carrying a cup; (2) time required to complete the walking task in the TT test; (3 and 4) walking and avoiding a moving obstacle as an ST and while carrying a cup; and (5) performing the TUG while carrying a cup. Separate bivariate logistic regression analyses showed that performance on these tasks was significantly associated with falling (P<.01). Despite the random forest analysis being a more robust approach than multivariate logistic regression, it was not clinically useful for predicting falls. Conclusions: This study identified the most important outcome measures in predicting falls using simple DT tests. The results showed that measures of change in performance were not useful in a multivariate model when compared with an "allocated all to falls" rule.

KW - accidental falls

KW - aged

KW - cognition

KW - gait

KW - rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891624280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.027

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.027

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 58

EP - 64

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

T2 - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 1

ER -