Validity and reliability of an alternative method for measuring power output during six second all out cycling

Martin Watson, Daniele Bibbo, Charles R. Duffy, Philip E. Riches, Silvia Conforto, Andrea Macaluso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a laboratory setting where both a mechanically-braked cycling ergometer and a motion analysis (MA) system are available, flywheel angular displacement can be estimated by using MA. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the validity and reliability of a MA method for measuring maximal power output (Pmax) in comparison with a force transducer (FT) method. Eight males and eight females undertook three identical sessions, separated by 4 to 6 days; the first being a familiarization session. Individuals performed three 6-second sprints against 50% of the maximal resistance to complete two pedal revolutions with a 3-minute rest between trials. Power was determined independently using both MA and FT analyses. Validity: MA recorded significantly higher Pmax than FT (P < .05). Bland-Altman plots showed that there was a systematic bias in the difference between the measures of the two systems. This difference increased as power increased. Repeatability: Intraclass correlation coefficients were on average 0.90 ± 0.05 in males and 0.85 ± 0.08 in females. Measuring Pmax by MA, therefore, is as appropriate for use in exercise physiology research as Pmax measured by FT, provided that a bias between these measurements methods is allowed for.
LanguageEnglish
Pages598-603
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Applied Biomechanics
Volume30
Issue number4
Early online date30 Jun 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Transducers
Foot
Research

Keywords

  • power output
  • cycling
  • power measurement
  • motion analysis
  • force transducers
  • flywheel
  • acceleration
  • instrumented pedal

Cite this

Watson, Martin ; Bibbo, Daniele ; Duffy, Charles R. ; Riches, Philip E. ; Conforto, Silvia ; Macaluso, Andrea. / Validity and reliability of an alternative method for measuring power output during six second all out cycling. In: Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 2014 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 598-603.
@article{1079aeba1b8241d2afddca01ca56d682,
title = "Validity and reliability of an alternative method for measuring power output during six second all out cycling",
abstract = "In a laboratory setting where both a mechanically-braked cycling ergometer and a motion analysis (MA) system are available, flywheel angular displacement can be estimated by using MA. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the validity and reliability of a MA method for measuring maximal power output (Pmax) in comparison with a force transducer (FT) method. Eight males and eight females undertook three identical sessions, separated by 4 to 6 days; the first being a familiarization session. Individuals performed three 6-second sprints against 50{\%} of the maximal resistance to complete two pedal revolutions with a 3-minute rest between trials. Power was determined independently using both MA and FT analyses. Validity: MA recorded significantly higher Pmax than FT (P < .05). Bland-Altman plots showed that there was a systematic bias in the difference between the measures of the two systems. This difference increased as power increased. Repeatability: Intraclass correlation coefficients were on average 0.90 ± 0.05 in males and 0.85 ± 0.08 in females. Measuring Pmax by MA, therefore, is as appropriate for use in exercise physiology research as Pmax measured by FT, provided that a bias between these measurements methods is allowed for.",
keywords = "power output, cycling, power measurement, motion analysis, force transducers, flywheel, acceleration, instrumented pedal",
author = "Martin Watson and Daniele Bibbo and Duffy, {Charles R.} and Riches, {Philip E.} and Silvia Conforto and Andrea Macaluso",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1123/jab.2013-0317",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "598--603",
journal = "Journal of Applied Biomechanics",
issn = "1065-8483",
number = "4",

}

Validity and reliability of an alternative method for measuring power output during six second all out cycling. / Watson, Martin; Bibbo, Daniele; Duffy, Charles R.; Riches, Philip E.; Conforto, Silvia; Macaluso, Andrea.

In: Journal of Applied Biomechanics, Vol. 30, No. 4, 08.2014, p. 598-603.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and reliability of an alternative method for measuring power output during six second all out cycling

AU - Watson, Martin

AU - Bibbo, Daniele

AU - Duffy, Charles R.

AU - Riches, Philip E.

AU - Conforto, Silvia

AU - Macaluso, Andrea

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - In a laboratory setting where both a mechanically-braked cycling ergometer and a motion analysis (MA) system are available, flywheel angular displacement can be estimated by using MA. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the validity and reliability of a MA method for measuring maximal power output (Pmax) in comparison with a force transducer (FT) method. Eight males and eight females undertook three identical sessions, separated by 4 to 6 days; the first being a familiarization session. Individuals performed three 6-second sprints against 50% of the maximal resistance to complete two pedal revolutions with a 3-minute rest between trials. Power was determined independently using both MA and FT analyses. Validity: MA recorded significantly higher Pmax than FT (P < .05). Bland-Altman plots showed that there was a systematic bias in the difference between the measures of the two systems. This difference increased as power increased. Repeatability: Intraclass correlation coefficients were on average 0.90 ± 0.05 in males and 0.85 ± 0.08 in females. Measuring Pmax by MA, therefore, is as appropriate for use in exercise physiology research as Pmax measured by FT, provided that a bias between these measurements methods is allowed for.

AB - In a laboratory setting where both a mechanically-braked cycling ergometer and a motion analysis (MA) system are available, flywheel angular displacement can be estimated by using MA. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the validity and reliability of a MA method for measuring maximal power output (Pmax) in comparison with a force transducer (FT) method. Eight males and eight females undertook three identical sessions, separated by 4 to 6 days; the first being a familiarization session. Individuals performed three 6-second sprints against 50% of the maximal resistance to complete two pedal revolutions with a 3-minute rest between trials. Power was determined independently using both MA and FT analyses. Validity: MA recorded significantly higher Pmax than FT (P < .05). Bland-Altman plots showed that there was a systematic bias in the difference between the measures of the two systems. This difference increased as power increased. Repeatability: Intraclass correlation coefficients were on average 0.90 ± 0.05 in males and 0.85 ± 0.08 in females. Measuring Pmax by MA, therefore, is as appropriate for use in exercise physiology research as Pmax measured by FT, provided that a bias between these measurements methods is allowed for.

KW - power output

KW - cycling

KW - power measurement

KW - motion analysis

KW - force transducers

KW - flywheel

KW - acceleration

KW - instrumented pedal

UR - http://journals.humankinetics.com/jab

U2 - 10.1123/jab.2013-0317

DO - 10.1123/jab.2013-0317

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 598

EP - 603

JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

T2 - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics

SN - 1065-8483

IS - 4

ER -