Valence politics in Scotland: towards an explanation of the 2007 election

Robert Johns, James Mitchell, David Denver, Charles Pattie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article we use evidence from the Scottish Election Study 2007 to build an explanation for the narrow SNP victory in the Holyrood election. The theoretical focus is on valence models of voting, which are increasingly important in Scotland following dealignment and ideological convergence in the party system, and as Scottish governments flex their executive muscle. Exploring the valence battleground reveals mixed but overall negative evaluations of Labour's performance in government, and suggests advantages for the SNP on issue competence, leadership and party image. Modelling party choice at the individual level shows that key valence variables - performance evaluations, economic competence and party image - have strong and significant effects, unlike hitherto prominent factors like religion, class and national identity. Constitutional preferences are important too, but their effects suggest a further valence link: the SNP's strong showing among voters seeking further devolution but opposed to independence is due in large part to its credentials as a battler for Scottish interests. In contrast, Labour's stand against 'more powers' may have tarnished its own reputation on that score.We conclude that the SNP edged home by persuading enough voters that it had a positive agenda for governing Scotland within the current constitutional arrangements, and that it could deliver on that agenda.
LanguageEnglish
Pages207-233
Number of pages26
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

election
labor
election research
politics
evaluation
reputation
performance
decentralization
voting
Religion
leadership
evidence
economics

Keywords

  • Scotland
  • election
  • Scottish National Party
  • SNP
  • valence models

Cite this

Johns, Robert ; Mitchell, James ; Denver, David ; Pattie, Charles. / Valence politics in Scotland : towards an explanation of the 2007 election. In: Political Studies. 2009 ; Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 207-233.
@article{8d8850f8361a48fb8a7f0e57962ff81e,
title = "Valence politics in Scotland: towards an explanation of the 2007 election",
abstract = "In this article we use evidence from the Scottish Election Study 2007 to build an explanation for the narrow SNP victory in the Holyrood election. The theoretical focus is on valence models of voting, which are increasingly important in Scotland following dealignment and ideological convergence in the party system, and as Scottish governments flex their executive muscle. Exploring the valence battleground reveals mixed but overall negative evaluations of Labour's performance in government, and suggests advantages for the SNP on issue competence, leadership and party image. Modelling party choice at the individual level shows that key valence variables - performance evaluations, economic competence and party image - have strong and significant effects, unlike hitherto prominent factors like religion, class and national identity. Constitutional preferences are important too, but their effects suggest a further valence link: the SNP's strong showing among voters seeking further devolution but opposed to independence is due in large part to its credentials as a battler for Scottish interests. In contrast, Labour's stand against 'more powers' may have tarnished its own reputation on that score.We conclude that the SNP edged home by persuading enough voters that it had a positive agenda for governing Scotland within the current constitutional arrangements, and that it could deliver on that agenda.",
keywords = "Scotland, election, Scottish National Party, SNP, valence models",
author = "Robert Johns and James Mitchell and David Denver and Charles Pattie",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00762.x",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "207--233",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
number = "1",

}

Valence politics in Scotland : towards an explanation of the 2007 election. / Johns, Robert; Mitchell, James; Denver, David; Pattie, Charles.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 57, No. 1, 03.2009, p. 207-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valence politics in Scotland

T2 - Political Studies

AU - Johns, Robert

AU - Mitchell, James

AU - Denver, David

AU - Pattie, Charles

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - In this article we use evidence from the Scottish Election Study 2007 to build an explanation for the narrow SNP victory in the Holyrood election. The theoretical focus is on valence models of voting, which are increasingly important in Scotland following dealignment and ideological convergence in the party system, and as Scottish governments flex their executive muscle. Exploring the valence battleground reveals mixed but overall negative evaluations of Labour's performance in government, and suggests advantages for the SNP on issue competence, leadership and party image. Modelling party choice at the individual level shows that key valence variables - performance evaluations, economic competence and party image - have strong and significant effects, unlike hitherto prominent factors like religion, class and national identity. Constitutional preferences are important too, but their effects suggest a further valence link: the SNP's strong showing among voters seeking further devolution but opposed to independence is due in large part to its credentials as a battler for Scottish interests. In contrast, Labour's stand against 'more powers' may have tarnished its own reputation on that score.We conclude that the SNP edged home by persuading enough voters that it had a positive agenda for governing Scotland within the current constitutional arrangements, and that it could deliver on that agenda.

AB - In this article we use evidence from the Scottish Election Study 2007 to build an explanation for the narrow SNP victory in the Holyrood election. The theoretical focus is on valence models of voting, which are increasingly important in Scotland following dealignment and ideological convergence in the party system, and as Scottish governments flex their executive muscle. Exploring the valence battleground reveals mixed but overall negative evaluations of Labour's performance in government, and suggests advantages for the SNP on issue competence, leadership and party image. Modelling party choice at the individual level shows that key valence variables - performance evaluations, economic competence and party image - have strong and significant effects, unlike hitherto prominent factors like religion, class and national identity. Constitutional preferences are important too, but their effects suggest a further valence link: the SNP's strong showing among voters seeking further devolution but opposed to independence is due in large part to its credentials as a battler for Scottish interests. In contrast, Labour's stand against 'more powers' may have tarnished its own reputation on that score.We conclude that the SNP edged home by persuading enough voters that it had a positive agenda for governing Scotland within the current constitutional arrangements, and that it could deliver on that agenda.

KW - Scotland

KW - election

KW - Scottish National Party

KW - SNP

KW - valence models

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00762.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00762.x

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 207

EP - 233

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 1

ER -