Valence politics and voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election

Harold Clarke, Jason Reifler, Thomas J. Scotto, Marianne C. Stewart, Paul Whiteley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyzes voting behavior in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Using national survey data gathered in the 2012 Political Support in America project, the paper investigates the ability of a valence politics model of electoral choice to account for voting in that election. Multivariate analyses reveal that a valence politics model comprised of judgments about party performance on important issues, flexible partisan attachments, and images of the two major presidential candidates outperforms rival models and provides a parsimonious and powerful explanation of decisions voters made. The analyses show that although several factors had significant effects on the vote, the impact of candidate images was especially strong. Although many voters expressed doubts about Obama's competence, even more were unconvinced that Romney offered a viable alternative. Most voters were unenthusiastic about Romney and this cost him dearly at the ballot box.
LanguageEnglish
Pages462-470
Number of pages9
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume40
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

presidential election
voting
politics
candidacy
political support
voting behavior
voter
election
ability
costs
performance

Keywords

  • campaign dynamics
  • Obama image
  • partisan dynamics
  • racial attitudes
  • Romney image

Cite this

Clarke, Harold ; Reifler, Jason ; Scotto, Thomas J. ; Stewart, Marianne C. ; Whiteley, Paul. / Valence politics and voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. In: Electoral Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 40. pp. 462-470.
@article{b1600eafc0fb45cba616649ea0a270e0,
title = "Valence politics and voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election",
abstract = "This paper analyzes voting behavior in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Using national survey data gathered in the 2012 Political Support in America project, the paper investigates the ability of a valence politics model of electoral choice to account for voting in that election. Multivariate analyses reveal that a valence politics model comprised of judgments about party performance on important issues, flexible partisan attachments, and images of the two major presidential candidates outperforms rival models and provides a parsimonious and powerful explanation of decisions voters made. The analyses show that although several factors had significant effects on the vote, the impact of candidate images was especially strong. Although many voters expressed doubts about Obama's competence, even more were unconvinced that Romney offered a viable alternative. Most voters were unenthusiastic about Romney and this cost him dearly at the ballot box.",
keywords = "campaign dynamics, Obama image, partisan dynamics, racial attitudes, Romney image",
author = "Harold Clarke and Jason Reifler and Scotto, {Thomas J.} and Stewart, {Marianne C.} and Paul Whiteley",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.011",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "462--470",
journal = "Electoral Studies",
issn = "0261-3794",

}

Valence politics and voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. / Clarke, Harold; Reifler, Jason; Scotto, Thomas J.; Stewart, Marianne C.; Whiteley, Paul.

In: Electoral Studies, Vol. 40, 31.12.2015, p. 462-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valence politics and voting in the 2012 U.S. presidential election

AU - Clarke, Harold

AU - Reifler, Jason

AU - Scotto, Thomas J.

AU - Stewart, Marianne C.

AU - Whiteley, Paul

PY - 2015/12/31

Y1 - 2015/12/31

N2 - This paper analyzes voting behavior in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Using national survey data gathered in the 2012 Political Support in America project, the paper investigates the ability of a valence politics model of electoral choice to account for voting in that election. Multivariate analyses reveal that a valence politics model comprised of judgments about party performance on important issues, flexible partisan attachments, and images of the two major presidential candidates outperforms rival models and provides a parsimonious and powerful explanation of decisions voters made. The analyses show that although several factors had significant effects on the vote, the impact of candidate images was especially strong. Although many voters expressed doubts about Obama's competence, even more were unconvinced that Romney offered a viable alternative. Most voters were unenthusiastic about Romney and this cost him dearly at the ballot box.

AB - This paper analyzes voting behavior in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. Using national survey data gathered in the 2012 Political Support in America project, the paper investigates the ability of a valence politics model of electoral choice to account for voting in that election. Multivariate analyses reveal that a valence politics model comprised of judgments about party performance on important issues, flexible partisan attachments, and images of the two major presidential candidates outperforms rival models and provides a parsimonious and powerful explanation of decisions voters made. The analyses show that although several factors had significant effects on the vote, the impact of candidate images was especially strong. Although many voters expressed doubts about Obama's competence, even more were unconvinced that Romney offered a viable alternative. Most voters were unenthusiastic about Romney and this cost him dearly at the ballot box.

KW - campaign dynamics

KW - Obama image

KW - partisan dynamics

KW - racial attitudes

KW - Romney image

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84909954353&partnerID=40&md5=c6c1518dba9276eac98fdb65796684bf

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379414001073

U2 - 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.011

DO - 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.011

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 462

EP - 470

JO - Electoral Studies

T2 - Electoral Studies

JF - Electoral Studies

SN - 0261-3794

ER -