Using the constant comparative technique to consider network change and evolution

Sarah L. Jack, Alistair R. Anderson, Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd, Susan Moult

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Developing greater understanding about if, how and why networks emerge, evolve and support growth has been recognized in the literature as an area for further research (Larson and Starr 1993; Uzzi 1997; Hite and Hesterly 2001). In this chapter we present data and demonstrate how the constant comparative approach can be used to develop theory and understanding about the entrepreneur and the practices in which he/she engages. This Chapter presents an unusual case, the emergence and development of a new network, where the unit of analysis is not the individual or the cluster, but the emergent network itself (Hite and Hesterley 2001; Hite 2003; 2005). In doing so, it demonstrates the usefulness and applicability of the constant comparative technique, how it operates and is used in practice, and its value to the field of entrepreneurship. The case itself draws on longitudinal observation, examination and analysis of network configuration, reconfiguration and change in an entrepreneurial network over a six-year period. Examining rich data about transformation enabled the purpose, content and objectives of entrepreneurial networking to be analysed using the constant comparison technique. From this analysis we propose that networking is fundamentally based on a social enactment of what it means to be enterprising (De Koning 1999; Hill et al. 1999; Singh et al. 1999). Hence, using the constant comparative technique shows that networks are not just about resource acquisition; but are more about softer, socialized issues such as social learning and confidence-building through interdependence and the sharing of experience.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship
EditorsHelle Neergaard, Claire Leitch
Pages21-51
Number of pages31
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Oct 2015

Publication series

NameResearch Handbooks in Business and Management series
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing

Fingerprint

Networking
Entrepreneurial networks
Resource acquisition
Data transformation
Reconfiguration
Confidence
Unit of analysis
Usefulness
Entrepreneurs
Enactment
Network configuration
Entrepreneurship
Interdependence
Social learning

Keywords

  • business management
  • entrepreneurship
  • research methods
  • qualitative research methods

Cite this

Jack, S. L., Anderson, A. R., Dodd, S. D., & Moult, S. (2015). Using the constant comparative technique to consider network change and evolution. In H. Neergaard, & C. Leitch (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship (pp. 21-51). (Research Handbooks in Business and Management series). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809870.00009
Jack, Sarah L. ; Anderson, Alistair R. ; Dodd, Sarah Drakopoulou ; Moult, Susan. / Using the constant comparative technique to consider network change and evolution. Handbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship. editor / Helle Neergaard ; Claire Leitch. 2015. pp. 21-51 (Research Handbooks in Business and Management series).
@inbook{44b468926a2a457aa74169fa52db06ad,
title = "Using the constant comparative technique to consider network change and evolution",
abstract = "Developing greater understanding about if, how and why networks emerge, evolve and support growth has been recognized in the literature as an area for further research (Larson and Starr 1993; Uzzi 1997; Hite and Hesterly 2001). In this chapter we present data and demonstrate how the constant comparative approach can be used to develop theory and understanding about the entrepreneur and the practices in which he/she engages. This Chapter presents an unusual case, the emergence and development of a new network, where the unit of analysis is not the individual or the cluster, but the emergent network itself (Hite and Hesterley 2001; Hite 2003; 2005). In doing so, it demonstrates the usefulness and applicability of the constant comparative technique, how it operates and is used in practice, and its value to the field of entrepreneurship. The case itself draws on longitudinal observation, examination and analysis of network configuration, reconfiguration and change in an entrepreneurial network over a six-year period. Examining rich data about transformation enabled the purpose, content and objectives of entrepreneurial networking to be analysed using the constant comparison technique. From this analysis we propose that networking is fundamentally based on a social enactment of what it means to be enterprising (De Koning 1999; Hill et al. 1999; Singh et al. 1999). Hence, using the constant comparative technique shows that networks are not just about resource acquisition; but are more about softer, socialized issues such as social learning and confidence-building through interdependence and the sharing of experience.",
keywords = "business management, entrepreneurship, research methods, qualitative research methods",
author = "Jack, {Sarah L.} and Anderson, {Alistair R.} and Dodd, {Sarah Drakopoulou} and Susan Moult",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "30",
doi = "10.4337/9781849809870.00009",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781849809870",
series = "Research Handbooks in Business and Management series",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
pages = "21--51",
editor = "Helle Neergaard and Claire Leitch",
booktitle = "Handbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship",

}

Jack, SL, Anderson, AR, Dodd, SD & Moult, S 2015, Using the constant comparative technique to consider network change and evolution. in H Neergaard & C Leitch (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship. Research Handbooks in Business and Management series, pp. 21-51. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809870.00009

Using the constant comparative technique to consider network change and evolution. / Jack, Sarah L.; Anderson, Alistair R.; Dodd, Sarah Drakopoulou; Moult, Susan.

Handbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship. ed. / Helle Neergaard; Claire Leitch. 2015. p. 21-51 (Research Handbooks in Business and Management series).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Using the constant comparative technique to consider network change and evolution

AU - Jack, Sarah L.

AU - Anderson, Alistair R.

AU - Dodd, Sarah Drakopoulou

AU - Moult, Susan

PY - 2015/10/30

Y1 - 2015/10/30

N2 - Developing greater understanding about if, how and why networks emerge, evolve and support growth has been recognized in the literature as an area for further research (Larson and Starr 1993; Uzzi 1997; Hite and Hesterly 2001). In this chapter we present data and demonstrate how the constant comparative approach can be used to develop theory and understanding about the entrepreneur and the practices in which he/she engages. This Chapter presents an unusual case, the emergence and development of a new network, where the unit of analysis is not the individual or the cluster, but the emergent network itself (Hite and Hesterley 2001; Hite 2003; 2005). In doing so, it demonstrates the usefulness and applicability of the constant comparative technique, how it operates and is used in practice, and its value to the field of entrepreneurship. The case itself draws on longitudinal observation, examination and analysis of network configuration, reconfiguration and change in an entrepreneurial network over a six-year period. Examining rich data about transformation enabled the purpose, content and objectives of entrepreneurial networking to be analysed using the constant comparison technique. From this analysis we propose that networking is fundamentally based on a social enactment of what it means to be enterprising (De Koning 1999; Hill et al. 1999; Singh et al. 1999). Hence, using the constant comparative technique shows that networks are not just about resource acquisition; but are more about softer, socialized issues such as social learning and confidence-building through interdependence and the sharing of experience.

AB - Developing greater understanding about if, how and why networks emerge, evolve and support growth has been recognized in the literature as an area for further research (Larson and Starr 1993; Uzzi 1997; Hite and Hesterly 2001). In this chapter we present data and demonstrate how the constant comparative approach can be used to develop theory and understanding about the entrepreneur and the practices in which he/she engages. This Chapter presents an unusual case, the emergence and development of a new network, where the unit of analysis is not the individual or the cluster, but the emergent network itself (Hite and Hesterley 2001; Hite 2003; 2005). In doing so, it demonstrates the usefulness and applicability of the constant comparative technique, how it operates and is used in practice, and its value to the field of entrepreneurship. The case itself draws on longitudinal observation, examination and analysis of network configuration, reconfiguration and change in an entrepreneurial network over a six-year period. Examining rich data about transformation enabled the purpose, content and objectives of entrepreneurial networking to be analysed using the constant comparison technique. From this analysis we propose that networking is fundamentally based on a social enactment of what it means to be enterprising (De Koning 1999; Hill et al. 1999; Singh et al. 1999). Hence, using the constant comparative technique shows that networks are not just about resource acquisition; but are more about softer, socialized issues such as social learning and confidence-building through interdependence and the sharing of experience.

KW - business management

KW - entrepreneurship

KW - research methods

KW - qualitative research methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960809403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4337/9781849809870.00009

DO - 10.4337/9781849809870.00009

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781849809870

T3 - Research Handbooks in Business and Management series

SP - 21

EP - 51

BT - Handbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship

A2 - Neergaard, Helle

A2 - Leitch, Claire

ER -

Jack SL, Anderson AR, Dodd SD, Moult S. Using the constant comparative technique to consider network change and evolution. In Neergaard H, Leitch C, editors, Handbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship. 2015. p. 21-51. (Research Handbooks in Business and Management series). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809870.00009