Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Opinion surveys capture public perceptions. What are the key considerations when designing and implementing them in the APRM? All participating countries in the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process have had to struggle with the long, complex and sometimes confusing and intimidating Self-Assessment Questionnaire covering key issues in four thematic areas: democracy and political governance, economic governance, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. Answering these questionnaires risks becoming a highly technical exercise, accessible only to experts and elites. But the APRM also requires that the voices and views of ordinary citizens be heard and incorporated. One practice that is becoming standard is conducting nationally representative opinion surveys among the population.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationGrappling with Governance
Subtitle of host publicationPerspectives on the African Peer Review Mechanism
Place of PublicationPretoria
Pages93-106
Number of pages14
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

peer review
political governance
questionnaire
corporate governance
self-assessment
economics
elite
expert
governance
democracy
citizen

Keywords

  • governance
  • peer review
  • opinion surveys
  • African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM)

Cite this

Mattes, R. (2010). Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process. In Grappling with Governance: Perspectives on the African Peer Review Mechanism (pp. 93-106). Pretoria.
Mattes, Robert. / Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process. Grappling with Governance: Perspectives on the African Peer Review Mechanism. Pretoria, 2010. pp. 93-106
@inbook{841ef719231c4bb3b9c4c1871fa90217,
title = "Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process",
abstract = "Opinion surveys capture public perceptions. What are the key considerations when designing and implementing them in the APRM? All participating countries in the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process have had to struggle with the long, complex and sometimes confusing and intimidating Self-Assessment Questionnaire covering key issues in four thematic areas: democracy and political governance, economic governance, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. Answering these questionnaires risks becoming a highly technical exercise, accessible only to experts and elites. But the APRM also requires that the voices and views of ordinary citizens be heard and incorporated. One practice that is becoming standard is conducting nationally representative opinion surveys among the population.",
keywords = "governance, peer review, opinion surveys, African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM)",
author = "Robert Mattes",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781920196301",
pages = "93--106",
booktitle = "Grappling with Governance",

}

Mattes, R 2010, Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process. in Grappling with Governance: Perspectives on the African Peer Review Mechanism. Pretoria, pp. 93-106.

Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process. / Mattes, Robert.

Grappling with Governance: Perspectives on the African Peer Review Mechanism. Pretoria, 2010. p. 93-106.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process

AU - Mattes, Robert

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Opinion surveys capture public perceptions. What are the key considerations when designing and implementing them in the APRM? All participating countries in the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process have had to struggle with the long, complex and sometimes confusing and intimidating Self-Assessment Questionnaire covering key issues in four thematic areas: democracy and political governance, economic governance, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. Answering these questionnaires risks becoming a highly technical exercise, accessible only to experts and elites. But the APRM also requires that the voices and views of ordinary citizens be heard and incorporated. One practice that is becoming standard is conducting nationally representative opinion surveys among the population.

AB - Opinion surveys capture public perceptions. What are the key considerations when designing and implementing them in the APRM? All participating countries in the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process have had to struggle with the long, complex and sometimes confusing and intimidating Self-Assessment Questionnaire covering key issues in four thematic areas: democracy and political governance, economic governance, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. Answering these questionnaires risks becoming a highly technical exercise, accessible only to experts and elites. But the APRM also requires that the voices and views of ordinary citizens be heard and incorporated. One practice that is becoming standard is conducting nationally representative opinion surveys among the population.

KW - governance

KW - peer review

KW - opinion surveys

KW - African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM)

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781920196301

SP - 93

EP - 106

BT - Grappling with Governance

CY - Pretoria

ER -

Mattes R. Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process. In Grappling with Governance: Perspectives on the African Peer Review Mechanism. Pretoria. 2010. p. 93-106