Abstract
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Grappling with Governance |
| Subtitle of host publication | Perspectives on the African Peer Review Mechanism |
| Place of Publication | Pretoria |
| Pages | 93-106 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- governance
- peer review
- opinion surveys
- African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM)
Cite this
}
Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process. / Mattes, Robert.
Grappling with Governance: Perspectives on the African Peer Review Mechanism. Pretoria, 2010. p. 93-106.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
TY - CHAP
T1 - Using Representative Opinion Surveys in the African Peer Review Mechanism Process
AU - Mattes, Robert
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Opinion surveys capture public perceptions. What are the key considerations when designing and implementing them in the APRM? All participating countries in the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process have had to struggle with the long, complex and sometimes confusing and intimidating Self-Assessment Questionnaire covering key issues in four thematic areas: democracy and political governance, economic governance, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. Answering these questionnaires risks becoming a highly technical exercise, accessible only to experts and elites. But the APRM also requires that the voices and views of ordinary citizens be heard and incorporated. One practice that is becoming standard is conducting nationally representative opinion surveys among the population.
AB - Opinion surveys capture public perceptions. What are the key considerations when designing and implementing them in the APRM? All participating countries in the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) process have had to struggle with the long, complex and sometimes confusing and intimidating Self-Assessment Questionnaire covering key issues in four thematic areas: democracy and political governance, economic governance, corporate governance, and socio-economic development. Answering these questionnaires risks becoming a highly technical exercise, accessible only to experts and elites. But the APRM also requires that the voices and views of ordinary citizens be heard and incorporated. One practice that is becoming standard is conducting nationally representative opinion surveys among the population.
KW - governance
KW - peer review
KW - opinion surveys
KW - African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM)
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781920196301
SP - 93
EP - 106
BT - Grappling with Governance
CY - Pretoria
ER -