Using estimated risk to develop stimulation strategies for enhanced geothermal systems

John Douglas, Hideo Aochi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) are an attractive source of low-carbon electricity and heating. Consequently, a number of tests of this technology have been made during the past couple of decades, and various projects are being planned or under development. EGS work by the injection of fluid into deep boreholes to increase permeability and hence allow the circulation and heating of fluid through a geothermal reservoir. Permeability is irreversibly increased by the generation of microseismicity through the shearing of pre-existing fractures or fault segments. One aspect of this technology that can cause public concern and consequently could limit the widespread adoption of EGS within populated areas is the risk of generating earthquakes that are sufficiently large to be felt (or even to cause building damage). Therefore, there is a need to balance stimulation and exploitation of the geothermal reservoir through fluid injection against the pressing requirement to keep the earthquake risk below an acceptable level. Current strategies to balance these potentially conflicting requirements rely on a traffic light system based on the observed magnitudes of the triggered earthquakes and the measured peak ground velocities from these events. In this article we propose an alternative system that uses the actual risk of generating felt (or damaging) earthquake ground motions at a site of interest (e.g. a nearby town) to control the injection rate. This risk is computed by combining characteristics of the observed seismicity of the previous 6 h with a (potentially site-specific) ground motion prediction equation to obtain a real-time seismic hazard curve; this is then convolved with the derivative of a (potentially site-specific) fragility curve. Based on the relation between computed risk and pre-defined acceptable risk thresholds, the injection is increased if the risk is below the amber level, decreased if the risk is between the amber and red levels, or stopped completely if the risk is above the red level. Based on simulations using a recently developed model of induced seismicity in geothermal systems, which is checked here using observations from the Basel EGS, in this article it is shown that the proposed procedure could lead to both acceptable levels of risk and increased permeability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1847-1858
Number of pages12
JournalPure and Applied Geophysics
Volume171
Issue number8
Early online date22 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2014

Keywords

  • enhanced geothermal systems
  • felt earthquakes
  • fluid injection
  • induced seismicity
  • probabilistic seismic hazard assessment
  • Seismic risk

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Using estimated risk to develop stimulation strategies for enhanced geothermal systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this