Use of a hospital database for the evaluation of clinical biochemistry results

C. Little, G. Gettinby, D. Irvine, P.D. Eckersall, M. Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A database of the clinical chemistry results from unwell animals referred to Glasgow University Veterinary School, by general practitioners, was studied. This database contains over 60,000 records, from more than 25,000 animals, obtained over a period of 18 years. A four-year period was selected during which the instruments and methods used for these analyses were unchanged. The biochemical analyses made on plasma from those dogs when first presented to the veterinary school were scrutinised in detail. These data have been summarised in a tabular form using the first, fifth, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th and 99th percentiles. The distributions of these values differ for different analytes and in particular do not conform to a normal curve. These data can be used to provide estimates of rarity to indicate the frequency with which extreme values associated with disease can be expected. Thus an individual datum can be flagged as high*, high**, high***, or high**** depending on whether it lies in the top 25 per cent, top 10 per cent, top 5 per cent or top 1 per cent, respectively, of cases in the hospital database. Low values can be flagged in the same way. This approach can complement the use of reference ranges from healthy animals to aid the interpretation of clinical biochemistry results from a new patient.
LanguageEnglish
Pages205-210
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Small Animal Practice
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1994

Fingerprint

Veterinary Schools
Biochemistry
biochemistry
Databases
general practitioners
animals
Clinical Chemistry
General Practitioners
complement
Reference Values
chemistry
Dogs
dogs
veterinary schools
methodology

Keywords

  • hospital database
  • clinical biochemistry

Cite this

Little, C. ; Gettinby, G. ; Irvine, D. ; Eckersall, P.D. ; Murray, M. / Use of a hospital database for the evaluation of clinical biochemistry results. In: Journal of Small Animal Practice. 1994 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 205-210.
@article{c45ec1638b064b3795c43e25ff61d496,
title = "Use of a hospital database for the evaluation of clinical biochemistry results",
abstract = "A database of the clinical chemistry results from unwell animals referred to Glasgow University Veterinary School, by general practitioners, was studied. This database contains over 60,000 records, from more than 25,000 animals, obtained over a period of 18 years. A four-year period was selected during which the instruments and methods used for these analyses were unchanged. The biochemical analyses made on plasma from those dogs when first presented to the veterinary school were scrutinised in detail. These data have been summarised in a tabular form using the first, fifth, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th and 99th percentiles. The distributions of these values differ for different analytes and in particular do not conform to a normal curve. These data can be used to provide estimates of rarity to indicate the frequency with which extreme values associated with disease can be expected. Thus an individual datum can be flagged as high*, high**, high***, or high**** depending on whether it lies in the top 25 per cent, top 10 per cent, top 5 per cent or top 1 per cent, respectively, of cases in the hospital database. Low values can be flagged in the same way. This approach can complement the use of reference ranges from healthy animals to aid the interpretation of clinical biochemistry results from a new patient.",
keywords = "hospital database, clinical biochemistry",
author = "C. Little and G. Gettinby and D. Irvine and P.D. Eckersall and M. Murray",
year = "1994",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-5827.1994.tb01692.x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "205--210",
journal = "Journal of Small Animal Practice",
issn = "0022-4510",
number = "4",

}

Use of a hospital database for the evaluation of clinical biochemistry results. / Little, C.; Gettinby, G.; Irvine, D.; Eckersall, P.D.; Murray, M.

In: Journal of Small Animal Practice, Vol. 35, No. 4, 04.1994, p. 205-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of a hospital database for the evaluation of clinical biochemistry results

AU - Little, C.

AU - Gettinby, G.

AU - Irvine, D.

AU - Eckersall, P.D.

AU - Murray, M.

PY - 1994/4

Y1 - 1994/4

N2 - A database of the clinical chemistry results from unwell animals referred to Glasgow University Veterinary School, by general practitioners, was studied. This database contains over 60,000 records, from more than 25,000 animals, obtained over a period of 18 years. A four-year period was selected during which the instruments and methods used for these analyses were unchanged. The biochemical analyses made on plasma from those dogs when first presented to the veterinary school were scrutinised in detail. These data have been summarised in a tabular form using the first, fifth, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th and 99th percentiles. The distributions of these values differ for different analytes and in particular do not conform to a normal curve. These data can be used to provide estimates of rarity to indicate the frequency with which extreme values associated with disease can be expected. Thus an individual datum can be flagged as high*, high**, high***, or high**** depending on whether it lies in the top 25 per cent, top 10 per cent, top 5 per cent or top 1 per cent, respectively, of cases in the hospital database. Low values can be flagged in the same way. This approach can complement the use of reference ranges from healthy animals to aid the interpretation of clinical biochemistry results from a new patient.

AB - A database of the clinical chemistry results from unwell animals referred to Glasgow University Veterinary School, by general practitioners, was studied. This database contains over 60,000 records, from more than 25,000 animals, obtained over a period of 18 years. A four-year period was selected during which the instruments and methods used for these analyses were unchanged. The biochemical analyses made on plasma from those dogs when first presented to the veterinary school were scrutinised in detail. These data have been summarised in a tabular form using the first, fifth, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th and 99th percentiles. The distributions of these values differ for different analytes and in particular do not conform to a normal curve. These data can be used to provide estimates of rarity to indicate the frequency with which extreme values associated with disease can be expected. Thus an individual datum can be flagged as high*, high**, high***, or high**** depending on whether it lies in the top 25 per cent, top 10 per cent, top 5 per cent or top 1 per cent, respectively, of cases in the hospital database. Low values can be flagged in the same way. This approach can complement the use of reference ranges from healthy animals to aid the interpretation of clinical biochemistry results from a new patient.

KW - hospital database

KW - clinical biochemistry

UR - http:dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1994.tb01692.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1994.tb01692.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1994.tb01692.x

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 205

EP - 210

JO - Journal of Small Animal Practice

T2 - Journal of Small Animal Practice

JF - Journal of Small Animal Practice

SN - 0022-4510

IS - 4

ER -