Understanding the influence of evidence in public health policy: what can we learn from the tobacco wars

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Public health is overtly policy-orientated and there is widespread support for the notion that health policies should be strongly informed by evidence. Despite this, studies consistently find that public health policies are not evidence-based. This is often explained by reference to popular theories about research-policy relations which highlight, amongst other things the communicative gaps between academics and policymakers, the centrality of values (or politics) to decision-making and the efforts by external interests to influence policy outcomes. Employing the ‘tobacco wars’ as a case study, with a particular focus on the UK, this paper explores how tobacco control advocates and tobacco industry interests have attempted to influence policy and how, in so doing, each has sought to enrol evidence. Whilst accepting that evidence has played an important role in tobacco policy development, the paper challenges claims that the implementation of tobacco control policies can be attributed to evidence. Turning to value-orientated and network-based approaches to conceptualising policy development, the paper demonstrates both the importance of values and the complex nature of coalitions. However, it argues that this approach needs to be supplemented by an ideational understanding of policy-change which pays attention to the ways in which arguments and evidence are constructed and framed. The paper also suggests there are signs the two, ‘coalitions’ involved in the ‘tobacco wars’ may be unravelling. Overall, the ‘tobacco wars’ serve to highlight the complex relationship between evidence and policy, offering some insights for those interested in studying or improving the use of evidence in policy.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages382-398
    Number of pages17
    JournalSocial Policy and Administration
    Volume47
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 7 Jun 2013

    Fingerprint

    health policy
    tobacco
    nicotine
    public health
    evidence
    policy development
    development policy
    coalition
    Values
    policy
    research policy
    politics
    decision making
    industry

    Keywords

    • evidence-based policy
    • lobbying
    • tobacco control
    • tobacco industry
    • knowledge exchange

    Cite this

    @article{0e10b2fd0e1c4452a9f9a7bdb5eb83de,
    title = "Understanding the influence of evidence in public health policy: what can we learn from the tobacco wars",
    abstract = "Public health is overtly policy-orientated and there is widespread support for the notion that health policies should be strongly informed by evidence. Despite this, studies consistently find that public health policies are not evidence-based. This is often explained by reference to popular theories about research-policy relations which highlight, amongst other things the communicative gaps between academics and policymakers, the centrality of values (or politics) to decision-making and the efforts by external interests to influence policy outcomes. Employing the ‘tobacco wars’ as a case study, with a particular focus on the UK, this paper explores how tobacco control advocates and tobacco industry interests have attempted to influence policy and how, in so doing, each has sought to enrol evidence. Whilst accepting that evidence has played an important role in tobacco policy development, the paper challenges claims that the implementation of tobacco control policies can be attributed to evidence. Turning to value-orientated and network-based approaches to conceptualising policy development, the paper demonstrates both the importance of values and the complex nature of coalitions. However, it argues that this approach needs to be supplemented by an ideational understanding of policy-change which pays attention to the ways in which arguments and evidence are constructed and framed. The paper also suggests there are signs the two, ‘coalitions’ involved in the ‘tobacco wars’ may be unravelling. Overall, the ‘tobacco wars’ serve to highlight the complex relationship between evidence and policy, offering some insights for those interested in studying or improving the use of evidence in policy.",
    keywords = "evidence-based policy, lobbying, tobacco control, tobacco industry, knowledge exchange",
    author = "Smith, {K. E.}",
    year = "2013",
    month = "6",
    day = "7",
    doi = "10.1111/spol.12025",
    language = "English",
    volume = "47",
    pages = "382--398",
    journal = "Social Policy and Administration",
    issn = "0144-5596",
    number = "4",

    }

    Understanding the influence of evidence in public health policy : what can we learn from the tobacco wars. / Smith, K. E.

    In: Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 47, No. 4, 07.06.2013, p. 382-398.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Understanding the influence of evidence in public health policy

    T2 - Social Policy and Administration

    AU - Smith, K. E.

    PY - 2013/6/7

    Y1 - 2013/6/7

    N2 - Public health is overtly policy-orientated and there is widespread support for the notion that health policies should be strongly informed by evidence. Despite this, studies consistently find that public health policies are not evidence-based. This is often explained by reference to popular theories about research-policy relations which highlight, amongst other things the communicative gaps between academics and policymakers, the centrality of values (or politics) to decision-making and the efforts by external interests to influence policy outcomes. Employing the ‘tobacco wars’ as a case study, with a particular focus on the UK, this paper explores how tobacco control advocates and tobacco industry interests have attempted to influence policy and how, in so doing, each has sought to enrol evidence. Whilst accepting that evidence has played an important role in tobacco policy development, the paper challenges claims that the implementation of tobacco control policies can be attributed to evidence. Turning to value-orientated and network-based approaches to conceptualising policy development, the paper demonstrates both the importance of values and the complex nature of coalitions. However, it argues that this approach needs to be supplemented by an ideational understanding of policy-change which pays attention to the ways in which arguments and evidence are constructed and framed. The paper also suggests there are signs the two, ‘coalitions’ involved in the ‘tobacco wars’ may be unravelling. Overall, the ‘tobacco wars’ serve to highlight the complex relationship between evidence and policy, offering some insights for those interested in studying or improving the use of evidence in policy.

    AB - Public health is overtly policy-orientated and there is widespread support for the notion that health policies should be strongly informed by evidence. Despite this, studies consistently find that public health policies are not evidence-based. This is often explained by reference to popular theories about research-policy relations which highlight, amongst other things the communicative gaps between academics and policymakers, the centrality of values (or politics) to decision-making and the efforts by external interests to influence policy outcomes. Employing the ‘tobacco wars’ as a case study, with a particular focus on the UK, this paper explores how tobacco control advocates and tobacco industry interests have attempted to influence policy and how, in so doing, each has sought to enrol evidence. Whilst accepting that evidence has played an important role in tobacco policy development, the paper challenges claims that the implementation of tobacco control policies can be attributed to evidence. Turning to value-orientated and network-based approaches to conceptualising policy development, the paper demonstrates both the importance of values and the complex nature of coalitions. However, it argues that this approach needs to be supplemented by an ideational understanding of policy-change which pays attention to the ways in which arguments and evidence are constructed and framed. The paper also suggests there are signs the two, ‘coalitions’ involved in the ‘tobacco wars’ may be unravelling. Overall, the ‘tobacco wars’ serve to highlight the complex relationship between evidence and policy, offering some insights for those interested in studying or improving the use of evidence in policy.

    KW - evidence-based policy

    KW - lobbying

    KW - tobacco control

    KW - tobacco industry

    KW - knowledge exchange

    U2 - 10.1111/spol.12025

    DO - 10.1111/spol.12025

    M3 - Article

    VL - 47

    SP - 382

    EP - 398

    JO - Social Policy and Administration

    JF - Social Policy and Administration

    SN - 0144-5596

    IS - 4

    ER -