Understanding responses to the political context of health inequalities in research and policy: can post-structural theories of power help?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    It is now widely accepted that health inequalities are directly linked to inequalities in power and material resources. Reflecting this, persuasive accounts of both the production of health inequalities and the failure of high-income countries to reduce these inequalities have been underpinned by references to structural (particularly neo-Marxist) theories of power. Such accounts highlight the importance of macro-level political and economic policies for health outcomes and, in particular, the unequally damaging impacts of policy reforms collectively referred to as ‘neoliberal’. This paper draws on interviews with researchers, civil servants, politicians, documentary makers and journalists (all of whom have undertaken work concerning health inequalities) to examine what these conversations reveal about these actors’ perceptions of, and responses to, the political context of health inequalities in the UK. In so doing, it illustrates the fluid and networked nature of political ‘power’ and ‘context’; findings that point to the potential utility of post-structural theories of power. This article argues that, if conceived of in ways which do not deny power differentials, post-structural theories can help: (i) call attention to ‘neoliberal’ inconsistencies; and (ii) explain how and why individuals who are critical of dominant policy approaches nonetheless appear to participate in their on-going production.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages355-376
    Number of pages22
    JournalSocial Theory and Health
    Volume13
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Aug 2015

    Fingerprint

    Health
    health
    Research
    neo-Marxism
    policy approach
    civil servant
    reform policy
    macro level
    political power
    journalist
    Economic Policy
    politician
    conversation
    Economics
    Research Personnel
    Interviews
    income
    interview
    resources

    Keywords

    • power
    • post-structural
    • political context
    • health inequalities
    • neoliberal
    • policymaking

    Cite this

    @article{538206e6c068425db87fe067e108c749,
    title = "Understanding responses to the political context of health inequalities in research and policy: can post-structural theories of power help?",
    abstract = "It is now widely accepted that health inequalities are directly linked to inequalities in power and material resources. Reflecting this, persuasive accounts of both the production of health inequalities and the failure of high-income countries to reduce these inequalities have been underpinned by references to structural (particularly neo-Marxist) theories of power. Such accounts highlight the importance of macro-level political and economic policies for health outcomes and, in particular, the unequally damaging impacts of policy reforms collectively referred to as ‘neoliberal’. This paper draws on interviews with researchers, civil servants, politicians, documentary makers and journalists (all of whom have undertaken work concerning health inequalities) to examine what these conversations reveal about these actors’ perceptions of, and responses to, the political context of health inequalities in the UK. In so doing, it illustrates the fluid and networked nature of political ‘power’ and ‘context’; findings that point to the potential utility of post-structural theories of power. This article argues that, if conceived of in ways which do not deny power differentials, post-structural theories can help: (i) call attention to ‘neoliberal’ inconsistencies; and (ii) explain how and why individuals who are critical of dominant policy approaches nonetheless appear to participate in their on-going production.",
    keywords = "power, post-structural, political context, health inequalities, neoliberal, policymaking",
    author = "Smith, {Katherine E}",
    year = "2015",
    month = "8",
    day = "12",
    doi = "10.1057/sth.2015.24",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "355--376",
    journal = "Social Theory and Health",
    issn = "1477-8211",
    number = "3-4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Understanding responses to the political context of health inequalities in research and policy

    T2 - Social Theory and Health

    AU - Smith, Katherine E

    PY - 2015/8/12

    Y1 - 2015/8/12

    N2 - It is now widely accepted that health inequalities are directly linked to inequalities in power and material resources. Reflecting this, persuasive accounts of both the production of health inequalities and the failure of high-income countries to reduce these inequalities have been underpinned by references to structural (particularly neo-Marxist) theories of power. Such accounts highlight the importance of macro-level political and economic policies for health outcomes and, in particular, the unequally damaging impacts of policy reforms collectively referred to as ‘neoliberal’. This paper draws on interviews with researchers, civil servants, politicians, documentary makers and journalists (all of whom have undertaken work concerning health inequalities) to examine what these conversations reveal about these actors’ perceptions of, and responses to, the political context of health inequalities in the UK. In so doing, it illustrates the fluid and networked nature of political ‘power’ and ‘context’; findings that point to the potential utility of post-structural theories of power. This article argues that, if conceived of in ways which do not deny power differentials, post-structural theories can help: (i) call attention to ‘neoliberal’ inconsistencies; and (ii) explain how and why individuals who are critical of dominant policy approaches nonetheless appear to participate in their on-going production.

    AB - It is now widely accepted that health inequalities are directly linked to inequalities in power and material resources. Reflecting this, persuasive accounts of both the production of health inequalities and the failure of high-income countries to reduce these inequalities have been underpinned by references to structural (particularly neo-Marxist) theories of power. Such accounts highlight the importance of macro-level political and economic policies for health outcomes and, in particular, the unequally damaging impacts of policy reforms collectively referred to as ‘neoliberal’. This paper draws on interviews with researchers, civil servants, politicians, documentary makers and journalists (all of whom have undertaken work concerning health inequalities) to examine what these conversations reveal about these actors’ perceptions of, and responses to, the political context of health inequalities in the UK. In so doing, it illustrates the fluid and networked nature of political ‘power’ and ‘context’; findings that point to the potential utility of post-structural theories of power. This article argues that, if conceived of in ways which do not deny power differentials, post-structural theories can help: (i) call attention to ‘neoliberal’ inconsistencies; and (ii) explain how and why individuals who are critical of dominant policy approaches nonetheless appear to participate in their on-going production.

    KW - power

    KW - post-structural

    KW - political context

    KW - health inequalities

    KW - neoliberal

    KW - policymaking

    U2 - 10.1057/sth.2015.24

    DO - 10.1057/sth.2015.24

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 355

    EP - 376

    JO - Social Theory and Health

    JF - Social Theory and Health

    SN - 1477-8211

    IS - 3-4

    ER -