Understanding reading development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is more than eighteen months now since Sir Jim Rose published his Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading (Rose, 2006). The publicity it occasioned has mostly died down, but waves of gloom continue to reverberate: those of us with broad and liberal understandings of what reading is and what reading is for regret Rose's insistence on discrete synthetic phonics as 'the prime approach to establishing word recognition' (2006, p. 20), and are unconvinced that the 'broad and language-rich curriculum' (p. 29) into which this teaching will be positioned will be anything like broad or rich enough to mitigate the reductionalist and technicist assumptions that so often accompany phonics teaching in the early years. Where, in all this discrete decoding work, we ask, do children learn what reading is good for?
LanguageEnglish
Pages115-117
Number of pages2
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Studies
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Teaching
publicity
curriculum
language

Keywords

  • reading development
  • early reading
  • synthetic phonics

Cite this

@article{0a0b527e0a8c4aebbcef5866054416d7,
title = "Understanding reading development",
abstract = "It is more than eighteen months now since Sir Jim Rose published his Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading (Rose, 2006). The publicity it occasioned has mostly died down, but waves of gloom continue to reverberate: those of us with broad and liberal understandings of what reading is and what reading is for regret Rose's insistence on discrete synthetic phonics as 'the prime approach to establishing word recognition' (2006, p. 20), and are unconvinced that the 'broad and language-rich curriculum' (p. 29) into which this teaching will be positioned will be anything like broad or rich enough to mitigate the reductionalist and technicist assumptions that so often accompany phonics teaching in the early years. Where, in all this discrete decoding work, we ask, do children learn what reading is good for?",
keywords = "reading development, early reading, synthetic phonics",
author = "V. Smith",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00397_10.x",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "115--117",
journal = "British Journal of Educational Studies",
issn = "0007-1005",
number = "1",

}

Understanding reading development. / Smith, V.

In: British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 56, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 115-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding reading development

AU - Smith, V.

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - It is more than eighteen months now since Sir Jim Rose published his Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading (Rose, 2006). The publicity it occasioned has mostly died down, but waves of gloom continue to reverberate: those of us with broad and liberal understandings of what reading is and what reading is for regret Rose's insistence on discrete synthetic phonics as 'the prime approach to establishing word recognition' (2006, p. 20), and are unconvinced that the 'broad and language-rich curriculum' (p. 29) into which this teaching will be positioned will be anything like broad or rich enough to mitigate the reductionalist and technicist assumptions that so often accompany phonics teaching in the early years. Where, in all this discrete decoding work, we ask, do children learn what reading is good for?

AB - It is more than eighteen months now since Sir Jim Rose published his Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading (Rose, 2006). The publicity it occasioned has mostly died down, but waves of gloom continue to reverberate: those of us with broad and liberal understandings of what reading is and what reading is for regret Rose's insistence on discrete synthetic phonics as 'the prime approach to establishing word recognition' (2006, p. 20), and are unconvinced that the 'broad and language-rich curriculum' (p. 29) into which this teaching will be positioned will be anything like broad or rich enough to mitigate the reductionalist and technicist assumptions that so often accompany phonics teaching in the early years. Where, in all this discrete decoding work, we ask, do children learn what reading is good for?

KW - reading development

KW - early reading

KW - synthetic phonics

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00397_10.x

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00397_10.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00397_10.x

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 115

EP - 117

JO - British Journal of Educational Studies

T2 - British Journal of Educational Studies

JF - British Journal of Educational Studies

SN - 0007-1005

IS - 1

ER -