Understanding "expert" scientists: implications for management and organization research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This essay contributes to the debate about rigor and relevance in management and organization research. The contribution derives from an empirical inquiry into the view of the research process of acknowledged experts in scientific research: Nobel Laureates. The research was conducted through loosely structured in-depth interviews with, and background information about, nineteen of these expert researchers. The analysis of the interviews suggests emergent themes of the process of successful research that are likely to be relevant to the conduct of management and organization research. We focus on three particularly forceful emergent themes from our interviews: the role of the ‘big leap’ and its relationship to intuition; the significance of seeing both the ‘big picture’ and the detail; and the ways of building and developing successful research teams. We set out our findings from the interviews in the context of the literature from history and philosophy of science, and examine the implications for management and organization research.
LanguageEnglish
JournalManagement Learning
Early online date16 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Management research
Process research
Philosophy of science
In-depth interviews
Intuition
History of science

Keywords

  • research design
  • research teams
  • intuition
  • master-apprentice relationship
  • expert scientists

Cite this

@article{bdffbb12c03f493da8bb252f5921eb3b,
title = "Understanding {"}expert{"} scientists: implications for management and organization research",
abstract = "This essay contributes to the debate about rigor and relevance in management and organization research. The contribution derives from an empirical inquiry into the view of the research process of acknowledged experts in scientific research: Nobel Laureates. The research was conducted through loosely structured in-depth interviews with, and background information about, nineteen of these expert researchers. The analysis of the interviews suggests emergent themes of the process of successful research that are likely to be relevant to the conduct of management and organization research. We focus on three particularly forceful emergent themes from our interviews: the role of the ‘big leap’ and its relationship to intuition; the significance of seeing both the ‘big picture’ and the detail; and the ways of building and developing successful research teams. We set out our findings from the interviews in the context of the literature from history and philosophy of science, and examine the implications for management and organization research.",
keywords = "research design, research teams, intuition, master-apprentice relationship, expert scientists",
author = "Viktor D{\"o}rfler and Colin Eden",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1177/1350507619866652",
language = "English",
journal = "Management Learning",
issn = "1350-5076",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding "expert" scientists

T2 - Management Learning

AU - Dörfler, Viktor

AU - Eden, Colin

PY - 2019/9/16

Y1 - 2019/9/16

N2 - This essay contributes to the debate about rigor and relevance in management and organization research. The contribution derives from an empirical inquiry into the view of the research process of acknowledged experts in scientific research: Nobel Laureates. The research was conducted through loosely structured in-depth interviews with, and background information about, nineteen of these expert researchers. The analysis of the interviews suggests emergent themes of the process of successful research that are likely to be relevant to the conduct of management and organization research. We focus on three particularly forceful emergent themes from our interviews: the role of the ‘big leap’ and its relationship to intuition; the significance of seeing both the ‘big picture’ and the detail; and the ways of building and developing successful research teams. We set out our findings from the interviews in the context of the literature from history and philosophy of science, and examine the implications for management and organization research.

AB - This essay contributes to the debate about rigor and relevance in management and organization research. The contribution derives from an empirical inquiry into the view of the research process of acknowledged experts in scientific research: Nobel Laureates. The research was conducted through loosely structured in-depth interviews with, and background information about, nineteen of these expert researchers. The analysis of the interviews suggests emergent themes of the process of successful research that are likely to be relevant to the conduct of management and organization research. We focus on three particularly forceful emergent themes from our interviews: the role of the ‘big leap’ and its relationship to intuition; the significance of seeing both the ‘big picture’ and the detail; and the ways of building and developing successful research teams. We set out our findings from the interviews in the context of the literature from history and philosophy of science, and examine the implications for management and organization research.

KW - research design

KW - research teams

KW - intuition

KW - master-apprentice relationship

KW - expert scientists

U2 - 10.1177/1350507619866652

DO - 10.1177/1350507619866652

M3 - Article

JO - Management Learning

JF - Management Learning

SN - 1350-5076

ER -