Understanding desistance: a critical review of theories of desistance

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Informed by a comprehensive review of theories and research into desistance (Weaver, 2015), this article advances a critical and contemporary overview of the main theories of desistance, drawing on illustrative empirical research. It begins by addressing definitional issues, prior to showing how various theories of desistance differently explain the phenomena of giving up crime. The article concludes by engaging with its limitations and its relatively muted impact on policy and practice. It is argued that desistance research, and its interpretation in both policy and practice, remains very individualistic in focus, and often disconnected from specific analyses of the cultural and structural contexts in which both offending and desistance take place. In considering how this review might inform future research, the article suggests that the desistance paradigm might be enhanced by attending to contemporary critiques of its limitations. In particular, this would suggest the application of intersectional methods and analyses, analyses of divergences in desistance pathways by crime type, enhanced critical and contextualizing analyses of cultural and structural influences on desistance, and, beyond individual desistance, a focus on the challenges of social integration for people with convictions, to better inform and shape penal policy and practice.
    LanguageEnglish
    Number of pages32
    JournalPsychology Crime and Law
    Early online date7 Jan 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Jan 2019

    Fingerprint

    Crime
    offense
    weaver
    Empirical Research
    social integration
    Research
    divergence
    empirical research
    paradigm
    interpretation

    Keywords

    • desistance
    • desistance theory
    • giving up crime
    • literature review
    • understanding desistance
    • theories of desistance

    Cite this

    @article{db55d431afef48d6865fe458955d5c14,
    title = "Understanding desistance: a critical review of theories of desistance",
    abstract = "Informed by a comprehensive review of theories and research into desistance (Weaver, 2015), this article advances a critical and contemporary overview of the main theories of desistance, drawing on illustrative empirical research. It begins by addressing definitional issues, prior to showing how various theories of desistance differently explain the phenomena of giving up crime. The article concludes by engaging with its limitations and its relatively muted impact on policy and practice. It is argued that desistance research, and its interpretation in both policy and practice, remains very individualistic in focus, and often disconnected from specific analyses of the cultural and structural contexts in which both offending and desistance take place. In considering how this review might inform future research, the article suggests that the desistance paradigm might be enhanced by attending to contemporary critiques of its limitations. In particular, this would suggest the application of intersectional methods and analyses, analyses of divergences in desistance pathways by crime type, enhanced critical and contextualizing analyses of cultural and structural influences on desistance, and, beyond individual desistance, a focus on the challenges of social integration for people with convictions, to better inform and shape penal policy and practice.",
    keywords = "desistance, desistance theory, giving up crime, literature review, understanding desistance, theories of desistance",
    author = "Beth Weaver",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "7",
    doi = "10.1080/1068316X.2018.1560444",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Psychology Crime and Law",
    issn = "1068-316X",

    }

    Understanding desistance : a critical review of theories of desistance. / Weaver, Beth.

    In: Psychology Crime and Law, 07.01.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Understanding desistance

    T2 - Psychology Crime and Law

    AU - Weaver, Beth

    PY - 2019/1/7

    Y1 - 2019/1/7

    N2 - Informed by a comprehensive review of theories and research into desistance (Weaver, 2015), this article advances a critical and contemporary overview of the main theories of desistance, drawing on illustrative empirical research. It begins by addressing definitional issues, prior to showing how various theories of desistance differently explain the phenomena of giving up crime. The article concludes by engaging with its limitations and its relatively muted impact on policy and practice. It is argued that desistance research, and its interpretation in both policy and practice, remains very individualistic in focus, and often disconnected from specific analyses of the cultural and structural contexts in which both offending and desistance take place. In considering how this review might inform future research, the article suggests that the desistance paradigm might be enhanced by attending to contemporary critiques of its limitations. In particular, this would suggest the application of intersectional methods and analyses, analyses of divergences in desistance pathways by crime type, enhanced critical and contextualizing analyses of cultural and structural influences on desistance, and, beyond individual desistance, a focus on the challenges of social integration for people with convictions, to better inform and shape penal policy and practice.

    AB - Informed by a comprehensive review of theories and research into desistance (Weaver, 2015), this article advances a critical and contemporary overview of the main theories of desistance, drawing on illustrative empirical research. It begins by addressing definitional issues, prior to showing how various theories of desistance differently explain the phenomena of giving up crime. The article concludes by engaging with its limitations and its relatively muted impact on policy and practice. It is argued that desistance research, and its interpretation in both policy and practice, remains very individualistic in focus, and often disconnected from specific analyses of the cultural and structural contexts in which both offending and desistance take place. In considering how this review might inform future research, the article suggests that the desistance paradigm might be enhanced by attending to contemporary critiques of its limitations. In particular, this would suggest the application of intersectional methods and analyses, analyses of divergences in desistance pathways by crime type, enhanced critical and contextualizing analyses of cultural and structural influences on desistance, and, beyond individual desistance, a focus on the challenges of social integration for people with convictions, to better inform and shape penal policy and practice.

    KW - desistance

    KW - desistance theory

    KW - giving up crime

    KW - literature review

    KW - understanding desistance

    KW - theories of desistance

    UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/gpcl20/current

    U2 - 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1560444

    DO - 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1560444

    M3 - Article

    JO - Psychology Crime and Law

    JF - Psychology Crime and Law

    SN - 1068-316X

    ER -