Understanding corruption in different contexts

Richard Rose, Caryn Peiffer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)
270 Downloads (Pure)


In their contribution entitled Understanding Corruption in Different Contexts, the authors Richard Rose and Caryn Peiffer discuss the meaning and standards of corruption by looking at countries in the Global North and Global South. They refer to fuzzy and broad definitions of corruption in circulation worldwide and emphasize the demand for an integrated explanation of corruption by following an interdisciplinary approach. The chapter offers a review of social scientists theories about causes and consequences of corruption followed by new findings and evidence from a comparison of 122 countries around the globe assessed by the Global Corruption Barometer and 176 countries compared by the Corruption Perception Index of Transparency International. Rose and Peiffer find that generalizations about corruption in countries grouped according to geography and culture are misleading. Variations in national context within continents are greater than differences between mean ratings of continents. A superficial comparison of the degree of corruption across continents and countries of the Global South and North is misleading. The authors suggest nine principles for reducing retail corruption with high practical value. In particular, they emphasize that reducing direct contact between public servants and citizens by delivering services electronically can result in more efficient public services at the grass roots and simultaneously lower the possibilities for corrupt behavior.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPublic Policy Research in the Global South
Subtitle of host publicationA Cross Country Perspective
EditorsHeike Grimm
Place of PublicationBerlin
ISBN (Print)9783030060619
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2019


  • corruption
  • public services
  • behaviour
  • interdisciplinary approach


Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding corruption in different contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this