Under one roof

a review and selective meta-analysis on the outcomes of residential child and youth care

E.J. Knorth, A.T. Harder, T. Zandberg, A.J. Kendrick

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    134 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Residential child and youth care is a radical intervention that in many countries is perceived as a 'last resort' solution that should be avoided if at all possible - not least because of scepticism about its effectiveness. Against this, there is the view that a residential placement can contribute to the positive development of some youth with serious behavioral and/or emotional disturbances. In this context, it is remarkable that there are so few reviews and meta-analyses of outcomes of residential child and youth care services. In this article, we report on research into outcome studies published in the period 1990-2005. The application of strict inclusion and selection criteria yielded 27 pre- and quasi-experimental studies (PE and QE) covering the development and outcomes for 2345 children and young persons. Since there is variation in the outcome measures, we give an integral overview of all the individual ES's in the studies. However, for seven studies with a PE-design it was possible to calculate an overall ES: the weighted mean effect sizes ranged from .45 (internalized problem behavior) to .60 (externalizing problem behavior; behavior problems in general). QE-studies prove that residential programs applying behavior-therapeutic methods and focusing on family involvement show the most promising short term outcomes. There is very little evidence on long term outcomes of residential care. It also strikes us that many studies lack a specific description of the residential intervention program.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)123-140
    Number of pages18
    JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
    Volume30
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008

    Fingerprint

    Child Care
    Meta-Analysis
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Affective Symptoms
    Patient Selection
    inclusion
    Research
    human being
    Problem Behavior
    lack
    evidence
    Therapeutics

    Keywords

    • meta-analysis
    • review
    • residential child care
    • institutional care
    • outcomes

    Cite this

    @article{ef9f14dbe37a4b14abcca054da6fe40f,
    title = "Under one roof: a review and selective meta-analysis on the outcomes of residential child and youth care",
    abstract = "Residential child and youth care is a radical intervention that in many countries is perceived as a 'last resort' solution that should be avoided if at all possible - not least because of scepticism about its effectiveness. Against this, there is the view that a residential placement can contribute to the positive development of some youth with serious behavioral and/or emotional disturbances. In this context, it is remarkable that there are so few reviews and meta-analyses of outcomes of residential child and youth care services. In this article, we report on research into outcome studies published in the period 1990-2005. The application of strict inclusion and selection criteria yielded 27 pre- and quasi-experimental studies (PE and QE) covering the development and outcomes for 2345 children and young persons. Since there is variation in the outcome measures, we give an integral overview of all the individual ES's in the studies. However, for seven studies with a PE-design it was possible to calculate an overall ES: the weighted mean effect sizes ranged from .45 (internalized problem behavior) to .60 (externalizing problem behavior; behavior problems in general). QE-studies prove that residential programs applying behavior-therapeutic methods and focusing on family involvement show the most promising short term outcomes. There is very little evidence on long term outcomes of residential care. It also strikes us that many studies lack a specific description of the residential intervention program.",
    keywords = "meta-analysis, review, residential child care, institutional care, outcomes",
    author = "E.J. Knorth and A.T. Harder and T. Zandberg and A.J. Kendrick",
    year = "2008",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.09.001",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "123--140",
    journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
    issn = "0190-7409",
    number = "2",

    }

    Under one roof : a review and selective meta-analysis on the outcomes of residential child and youth care. / Knorth, E.J.; Harder, A.T.; Zandberg, T.; Kendrick, A.J.

    In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 123-140.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Under one roof

    T2 - a review and selective meta-analysis on the outcomes of residential child and youth care

    AU - Knorth, E.J.

    AU - Harder, A.T.

    AU - Zandberg, T.

    AU - Kendrick, A.J.

    PY - 2008/2

    Y1 - 2008/2

    N2 - Residential child and youth care is a radical intervention that in many countries is perceived as a 'last resort' solution that should be avoided if at all possible - not least because of scepticism about its effectiveness. Against this, there is the view that a residential placement can contribute to the positive development of some youth with serious behavioral and/or emotional disturbances. In this context, it is remarkable that there are so few reviews and meta-analyses of outcomes of residential child and youth care services. In this article, we report on research into outcome studies published in the period 1990-2005. The application of strict inclusion and selection criteria yielded 27 pre- and quasi-experimental studies (PE and QE) covering the development and outcomes for 2345 children and young persons. Since there is variation in the outcome measures, we give an integral overview of all the individual ES's in the studies. However, for seven studies with a PE-design it was possible to calculate an overall ES: the weighted mean effect sizes ranged from .45 (internalized problem behavior) to .60 (externalizing problem behavior; behavior problems in general). QE-studies prove that residential programs applying behavior-therapeutic methods and focusing on family involvement show the most promising short term outcomes. There is very little evidence on long term outcomes of residential care. It also strikes us that many studies lack a specific description of the residential intervention program.

    AB - Residential child and youth care is a radical intervention that in many countries is perceived as a 'last resort' solution that should be avoided if at all possible - not least because of scepticism about its effectiveness. Against this, there is the view that a residential placement can contribute to the positive development of some youth with serious behavioral and/or emotional disturbances. In this context, it is remarkable that there are so few reviews and meta-analyses of outcomes of residential child and youth care services. In this article, we report on research into outcome studies published in the period 1990-2005. The application of strict inclusion and selection criteria yielded 27 pre- and quasi-experimental studies (PE and QE) covering the development and outcomes for 2345 children and young persons. Since there is variation in the outcome measures, we give an integral overview of all the individual ES's in the studies. However, for seven studies with a PE-design it was possible to calculate an overall ES: the weighted mean effect sizes ranged from .45 (internalized problem behavior) to .60 (externalizing problem behavior; behavior problems in general). QE-studies prove that residential programs applying behavior-therapeutic methods and focusing on family involvement show the most promising short term outcomes. There is very little evidence on long term outcomes of residential care. It also strikes us that many studies lack a specific description of the residential intervention program.

    KW - meta-analysis

    KW - review

    KW - residential child care

    KW - institutional care

    KW - outcomes

    U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.09.001

    DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.09.001

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 123

    EP - 140

    JO - Children and Youth Services Review

    JF - Children and Youth Services Review

    SN - 0190-7409

    IS - 2

    ER -