Uncertainty in airflow rate calculations due to the use of surface-averaged pressure coefficients

D. Cóstola, B. Blocken, M. Ohba, J. L M Hensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mean wind pressure coefficients (Cp) are key input parameters for air infiltration and ventilation studies. However, building energy simulation and stand-alone airflow network programs usually only provide and/or use a limited amount of Cp data, which are based on several assumptions. An important assumption consists of using surface-averaged Cp values instead of local Cp values with a high resolution in space. This paper provides information on the uncertainty in the calculated airflow rate due to the use of surface-averaged Cp data. The study is performed using published empirical data on pressure coefficients obtained from extensive wind tunnel experiments. The uncertainty is assessed based on the comparison of the airflow rate (φ{symbol}) calculated using the surface-averaged Cp values (φ{symbol}AV) and the airflow rate calculated using local Cp values (φ{symbol}LOC). The results indicate that the uncertainty with a confidence interval of 95% is high: 0.23 φ{symbol}AV < φ{symbol}LOC < 5.07 φ{symbol}AV. In cases with the largest surface-averaged ΔCp, the underestimation or overestimation is smaller but not negligible: 0.52 φ{symbol}AV < φ{symbol}LOC < 1.42 φ{symbol}AV. These results provide boundaries for future improvements in Cp data quality, and new developments can be evaluated by comparison with the uncertainty of the current methods.

LanguageEnglish
Pages881-888
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Infiltration
Ventilation
Wind tunnels
Uncertainty
Air
Experiments

Keywords

  • air flow network (AFN) program
  • building energy simulation (BES)
  • error
  • infiltration
  • sensitivity
  • surface averaging
  • uncertainty
  • ventilation
  • wind pressure coefficient

Cite this

Cóstola, D. ; Blocken, B. ; Ohba, M. ; Hensen, J. L M. / Uncertainty in airflow rate calculations due to the use of surface-averaged pressure coefficients. In: Energy and Buildings. 2010 ; Vol. 42, No. 6. pp. 881-888.
@article{f55d38d0193048a8a9f760a64b093cf8,
title = "Uncertainty in airflow rate calculations due to the use of surface-averaged pressure coefficients",
abstract = "Mean wind pressure coefficients (Cp) are key input parameters for air infiltration and ventilation studies. However, building energy simulation and stand-alone airflow network programs usually only provide and/or use a limited amount of Cp data, which are based on several assumptions. An important assumption consists of using surface-averaged Cp values instead of local Cp values with a high resolution in space. This paper provides information on the uncertainty in the calculated airflow rate due to the use of surface-averaged Cp data. The study is performed using published empirical data on pressure coefficients obtained from extensive wind tunnel experiments. The uncertainty is assessed based on the comparison of the airflow rate (φ{symbol}) calculated using the surface-averaged Cp values (φ{symbol}AV) and the airflow rate calculated using local Cp values (φ{symbol}LOC). The results indicate that the uncertainty with a confidence interval of 95{\%} is high: 0.23 φ{symbol}AV < φ{symbol}LOC < 5.07 φ{symbol}AV. In cases with the largest surface-averaged ΔCp, the underestimation or overestimation is smaller but not negligible: 0.52 φ{symbol}AV < φ{symbol}LOC < 1.42 φ{symbol}AV. These results provide boundaries for future improvements in Cp data quality, and new developments can be evaluated by comparison with the uncertainty of the current methods.",
keywords = "air flow network (AFN) program, building energy simulation (BES), error, infiltration, sensitivity, surface averaging, uncertainty, ventilation, wind pressure coefficient",
author = "D. C{\'o}stola and B. Blocken and M. Ohba and Hensen, {J. L M}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.010",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "881--888",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

Uncertainty in airflow rate calculations due to the use of surface-averaged pressure coefficients. / Cóstola, D.; Blocken, B.; Ohba, M.; Hensen, J. L M.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 42, No. 6, 30.06.2010, p. 881-888.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainty in airflow rate calculations due to the use of surface-averaged pressure coefficients

AU - Cóstola, D.

AU - Blocken, B.

AU - Ohba, M.

AU - Hensen, J. L M

PY - 2010/6/30

Y1 - 2010/6/30

N2 - Mean wind pressure coefficients (Cp) are key input parameters for air infiltration and ventilation studies. However, building energy simulation and stand-alone airflow network programs usually only provide and/or use a limited amount of Cp data, which are based on several assumptions. An important assumption consists of using surface-averaged Cp values instead of local Cp values with a high resolution in space. This paper provides information on the uncertainty in the calculated airflow rate due to the use of surface-averaged Cp data. The study is performed using published empirical data on pressure coefficients obtained from extensive wind tunnel experiments. The uncertainty is assessed based on the comparison of the airflow rate (φ{symbol}) calculated using the surface-averaged Cp values (φ{symbol}AV) and the airflow rate calculated using local Cp values (φ{symbol}LOC). The results indicate that the uncertainty with a confidence interval of 95% is high: 0.23 φ{symbol}AV < φ{symbol}LOC < 5.07 φ{symbol}AV. In cases with the largest surface-averaged ΔCp, the underestimation or overestimation is smaller but not negligible: 0.52 φ{symbol}AV < φ{symbol}LOC < 1.42 φ{symbol}AV. These results provide boundaries for future improvements in Cp data quality, and new developments can be evaluated by comparison with the uncertainty of the current methods.

AB - Mean wind pressure coefficients (Cp) are key input parameters for air infiltration and ventilation studies. However, building energy simulation and stand-alone airflow network programs usually only provide and/or use a limited amount of Cp data, which are based on several assumptions. An important assumption consists of using surface-averaged Cp values instead of local Cp values with a high resolution in space. This paper provides information on the uncertainty in the calculated airflow rate due to the use of surface-averaged Cp data. The study is performed using published empirical data on pressure coefficients obtained from extensive wind tunnel experiments. The uncertainty is assessed based on the comparison of the airflow rate (φ{symbol}) calculated using the surface-averaged Cp values (φ{symbol}AV) and the airflow rate calculated using local Cp values (φ{symbol}LOC). The results indicate that the uncertainty with a confidence interval of 95% is high: 0.23 φ{symbol}AV < φ{symbol}LOC < 5.07 φ{symbol}AV. In cases with the largest surface-averaged ΔCp, the underestimation or overestimation is smaller but not negligible: 0.52 φ{symbol}AV < φ{symbol}LOC < 1.42 φ{symbol}AV. These results provide boundaries for future improvements in Cp data quality, and new developments can be evaluated by comparison with the uncertainty of the current methods.

KW - air flow network (AFN) program

KW - building energy simulation (BES)

KW - error

KW - infiltration

KW - sensitivity

KW - surface averaging

KW - uncertainty

KW - ventilation

KW - wind pressure coefficient

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950298208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.010

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.010

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 881

EP - 888

JO - Energy and Buildings

T2 - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

IS - 6

ER -