Uncertainty analysis comes to integrated assessment models for climate change…and conversely

Roger M Cooke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)


This article traces the development of uncertainty analysis through three generations punctuated by large methodology investments in the nuclear sector. Driven by a very high perceived legitimation burden, these investments aimed at strengthening the scientific basis of uncertainty quantification. The first generation building off the Reactor Safety Study introduced structured expert judgment in uncertainty propagation and distinguished variability and uncertainty. The second generation emerged in modeling the physical processes inside the reactor containment building after breach of the reactor vessel. Operational definitions and expert judgment for uncertainty quantification were elaborated. The third generation developed in modeling the consequences of release of radioactivity and transport through the biosphere. Expert performance assessment, dependence elicitation and probabilistic inversion are among the hallmarks. Third generation methods may be profitably employed in current Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) of climate change. Possible applications of dependence modeling and probabilistic inversion are sketched. It is unlikely that these methods will be fully adequate for quantitative uncertainty analyses of the impacts of climate change, and a penultimate section looks ahead to fourth generation methods.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)467-479
Number of pages13
JournalClimatic change
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013


  • uncertainty analysis
  • climate change
  • assessment models


Dive into the research topics of 'Uncertainty analysis comes to integrated assessment models for climate change…and conversely'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this