Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire + arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approaches

Y. Javadi, C. N. MacLeod, S. G. Pierce, A. Gachagan, W. Kerr, Jialuo Ding, Stewart Williams, M. Vasilev, R. Su, C. Mineo, J. Dziewierz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, three aluminium samples produced by wire + arc additive manufacture (WAAM) are inspected using ultrasonic phased array technology. Artificial defects are machined using a centre drill, ø 3 mm, and electrical discharge machining (EDM), ø 0.5-1 mm, in a cylindrical through-hole topology. The samples are first inspected using a single-element wheel probe mounted on a KUKA robot in order to investigate the feasibility of using a conventional ultrasonic transducer approach. Unfortunately, the wheel probe is found to be unsuitable for scanning the WAAM specimens and ultrasonic phased arrays are employed next. The set-up includes 5 MHz and 10 MHz arrays (128 elements) in direct contact with the sample surface using both the conventional and total focusing method (TFM) imaging techniques. Using an FIToolbox (Diagnostic Sonar, UK) as the controller, a phased array aperture of 32 elements is used to perform a focused B-scan with a range of settings for the transmit focal depth. All of the reflectors (including those located near the WAAM top surface) are successfully detected with a combination of conventional phased array and TFM, using a range of settings and set-ups, including bottom surface inspection, application through a plexiglass wedge and variation of the scanning frequency.

LanguageEnglish
Pages144-148
Number of pages5
JournalInsight: Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Inspection
Ultrasonics
Wire
Imaging techniques
Wheels
Scanning
Electric discharge machining
Ultrasonic transducers
Sonar
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Aluminum
Topology
Robots
Defects
Controllers

Keywords

  • artificial defects
  • full matrix capture (FMC)
  • total focusing method (TFM)
  • ultrasonic phased array
  • wire + arc additive manufacture (WAAM)

Cite this

@article{1b55f1a5a27b403e96888cffbfd96db0,
title = "Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire + arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approaches",
abstract = "In this study, three aluminium samples produced by wire + arc additive manufacture (WAAM) are inspected using ultrasonic phased array technology. Artificial defects are machined using a centre drill, {\o} 3 mm, and electrical discharge machining (EDM), {\o} 0.5-1 mm, in a cylindrical through-hole topology. The samples are first inspected using a single-element wheel probe mounted on a KUKA robot in order to investigate the feasibility of using a conventional ultrasonic transducer approach. Unfortunately, the wheel probe is found to be unsuitable for scanning the WAAM specimens and ultrasonic phased arrays are employed next. The set-up includes 5 MHz and 10 MHz arrays (128 elements) in direct contact with the sample surface using both the conventional and total focusing method (TFM) imaging techniques. Using an FIToolbox (Diagnostic Sonar, UK) as the controller, a phased array aperture of 32 elements is used to perform a focused B-scan with a range of settings for the transmit focal depth. All of the reflectors (including those located near the WAAM top surface) are successfully detected with a combination of conventional phased array and TFM, using a range of settings and set-ups, including bottom surface inspection, application through a plexiglass wedge and variation of the scanning frequency.",
keywords = "artificial defects, full matrix capture (FMC), total focusing method (TFM), ultrasonic phased array, wire + arc additive manufacture (WAAM)",
author = "Y. Javadi and MacLeod, {C. N.} and Pierce, {S. G.} and A. Gachagan and W. Kerr and Jialuo Ding and Stewart Williams and M. Vasilev and R. Su and C. Mineo and J. Dziewierz",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1784/insi.2019.61.3.144",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "144--148",
journal = "Insight: The Journal of the British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing",
issn = "1354-2575",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire + arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approaches

AU - Javadi, Y.

AU - MacLeod, C. N.

AU - Pierce, S. G.

AU - Gachagan, A.

AU - Kerr, W.

AU - Ding, Jialuo

AU - Williams, Stewart

AU - Vasilev, M.

AU - Su, R.

AU - Mineo, C.

AU - Dziewierz, J.

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - In this study, three aluminium samples produced by wire + arc additive manufacture (WAAM) are inspected using ultrasonic phased array technology. Artificial defects are machined using a centre drill, ø 3 mm, and electrical discharge machining (EDM), ø 0.5-1 mm, in a cylindrical through-hole topology. The samples are first inspected using a single-element wheel probe mounted on a KUKA robot in order to investigate the feasibility of using a conventional ultrasonic transducer approach. Unfortunately, the wheel probe is found to be unsuitable for scanning the WAAM specimens and ultrasonic phased arrays are employed next. The set-up includes 5 MHz and 10 MHz arrays (128 elements) in direct contact with the sample surface using both the conventional and total focusing method (TFM) imaging techniques. Using an FIToolbox (Diagnostic Sonar, UK) as the controller, a phased array aperture of 32 elements is used to perform a focused B-scan with a range of settings for the transmit focal depth. All of the reflectors (including those located near the WAAM top surface) are successfully detected with a combination of conventional phased array and TFM, using a range of settings and set-ups, including bottom surface inspection, application through a plexiglass wedge and variation of the scanning frequency.

AB - In this study, three aluminium samples produced by wire + arc additive manufacture (WAAM) are inspected using ultrasonic phased array technology. Artificial defects are machined using a centre drill, ø 3 mm, and electrical discharge machining (EDM), ø 0.5-1 mm, in a cylindrical through-hole topology. The samples are first inspected using a single-element wheel probe mounted on a KUKA robot in order to investigate the feasibility of using a conventional ultrasonic transducer approach. Unfortunately, the wheel probe is found to be unsuitable for scanning the WAAM specimens and ultrasonic phased arrays are employed next. The set-up includes 5 MHz and 10 MHz arrays (128 elements) in direct contact with the sample surface using both the conventional and total focusing method (TFM) imaging techniques. Using an FIToolbox (Diagnostic Sonar, UK) as the controller, a phased array aperture of 32 elements is used to perform a focused B-scan with a range of settings for the transmit focal depth. All of the reflectors (including those located near the WAAM top surface) are successfully detected with a combination of conventional phased array and TFM, using a range of settings and set-ups, including bottom surface inspection, application through a plexiglass wedge and variation of the scanning frequency.

KW - artificial defects

KW - full matrix capture (FMC)

KW - total focusing method (TFM)

KW - ultrasonic phased array

KW - wire + arc additive manufacture (WAAM)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064199348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1784/insi.2019.61.3.144

DO - 10.1784/insi.2019.61.3.144

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 144

EP - 148

JO - Insight: The Journal of the British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing

T2 - Insight: The Journal of the British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing

JF - Insight: The Journal of the British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing

SN - 1354-2575

IS - 3

ER -