UK construction practitioners' experience of adjudication

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper aims to fill a gap in the literature by exploring the construction professionals' interaction with adjudication at a key stage in its evolution based on a focus group analysis of industry experiences. The research aims to provide a richer understanding of the professional's interaction with the adjudication process more generally, as well providing detailed insights into the issues that different professional groupings have experienced with the process, more specifically. At first glance, the conclusions of the research offer few surprises, confirming the importance of financial aspects of the process, the timescales involved, the quality of adjudication professionals and the role of legal practitioners in adjudication. A closer examination of the focus group analysis, however, suggests that the loss of confidence in the process is attributable to a myriad of interrelated factors linking professional reputation with understanding of commercial realities and business relationships, lawyer-client power imbalances and dispute tactics, the role of lawyers with dispute complexity, parliamentary intentions and the timescale of the process. Although, it is recognised that on-going changes to adjudication will add more uncertainties into the context, the findings of this study will act as a springboard from which further research will be conducted.
LanguageEnglish
Pages137-144
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law
Volume166
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Industry
Focus groups
Interaction
Time scales
Lawyers
Dispute
Uncertainty
Business relationships
Imbalance
Factors
Confidence
Grouping
Tactics
Surprise

Keywords

  • construction participants
  • contracts & law
  • management
  • disputes & arbitration
  • construction law

Cite this

@article{c28aa111215b4c6c80bdbfd6a98712b5,
title = "UK construction practitioners' experience of adjudication",
abstract = "This paper aims to fill a gap in the literature by exploring the construction professionals' interaction with adjudication at a key stage in its evolution based on a focus group analysis of industry experiences. The research aims to provide a richer understanding of the professional's interaction with the adjudication process more generally, as well providing detailed insights into the issues that different professional groupings have experienced with the process, more specifically. At first glance, the conclusions of the research offer few surprises, confirming the importance of financial aspects of the process, the timescales involved, the quality of adjudication professionals and the role of legal practitioners in adjudication. A closer examination of the focus group analysis, however, suggests that the loss of confidence in the process is attributable to a myriad of interrelated factors linking professional reputation with understanding of commercial realities and business relationships, lawyer-client power imbalances and dispute tactics, the role of lawyers with dispute complexity, parliamentary intentions and the timescale of the process. Although, it is recognised that on-going changes to adjudication will add more uncertainties into the context, the findings of this study will act as a springboard from which further research will be conducted.",
keywords = "construction participants, contracts & law, management, disputes & arbitration, construction law",
author = "Agapiou, {Andrew A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1680/mpal.11.00047",
language = "English",
volume = "166",
pages = "137--144",
journal = "Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law",
issn = "1751-4304",
number = "3",

}

UK construction practitioners' experience of adjudication. / Agapiou, Andrew A.

In: Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law , Vol. 166, No. 3, 01.06.2013, p. 137-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - UK construction practitioners' experience of adjudication

AU - Agapiou, Andrew A.

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - This paper aims to fill a gap in the literature by exploring the construction professionals' interaction with adjudication at a key stage in its evolution based on a focus group analysis of industry experiences. The research aims to provide a richer understanding of the professional's interaction with the adjudication process more generally, as well providing detailed insights into the issues that different professional groupings have experienced with the process, more specifically. At first glance, the conclusions of the research offer few surprises, confirming the importance of financial aspects of the process, the timescales involved, the quality of adjudication professionals and the role of legal practitioners in adjudication. A closer examination of the focus group analysis, however, suggests that the loss of confidence in the process is attributable to a myriad of interrelated factors linking professional reputation with understanding of commercial realities and business relationships, lawyer-client power imbalances and dispute tactics, the role of lawyers with dispute complexity, parliamentary intentions and the timescale of the process. Although, it is recognised that on-going changes to adjudication will add more uncertainties into the context, the findings of this study will act as a springboard from which further research will be conducted.

AB - This paper aims to fill a gap in the literature by exploring the construction professionals' interaction with adjudication at a key stage in its evolution based on a focus group analysis of industry experiences. The research aims to provide a richer understanding of the professional's interaction with the adjudication process more generally, as well providing detailed insights into the issues that different professional groupings have experienced with the process, more specifically. At first glance, the conclusions of the research offer few surprises, confirming the importance of financial aspects of the process, the timescales involved, the quality of adjudication professionals and the role of legal practitioners in adjudication. A closer examination of the focus group analysis, however, suggests that the loss of confidence in the process is attributable to a myriad of interrelated factors linking professional reputation with understanding of commercial realities and business relationships, lawyer-client power imbalances and dispute tactics, the role of lawyers with dispute complexity, parliamentary intentions and the timescale of the process. Although, it is recognised that on-going changes to adjudication will add more uncertainties into the context, the findings of this study will act as a springboard from which further research will be conducted.

KW - construction participants

KW - contracts & law

KW - management

KW - disputes & arbitration

KW - construction law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881271370&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1680/mpal.11.00047

DO - 10.1680/mpal.11.00047

M3 - Article

VL - 166

SP - 137

EP - 144

JO - Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law

T2 - Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law

JF - Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law

SN - 1751-4304

IS - 3

ER -