Turkish voters and losers consent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper tests four hypotheses of “losers’ consent”—that is, the extent to which evaluations of democratic governance are shared by citizens who voted for the Justice and Development Party (AKP), the winner at the 2007 Turkish elections, and those who voted for the opposition parties, the Republican People’s Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP). It uses survey data about governance evaluations from the 2007 Turkish Election Study. The evidence rejects the idea that losers withhold consent, creating polarized pluralism. It gives some support to a winner’s effect. It finds a substantial degree of similarity in views of governance across party lines. Differences between voters for the two losing parties are sometimes greater than differences with the AKP. Regardless of dissatisfaction with some features of governance, there is an overwhelming consensus rejecting a change of regime to military or Shari’a rule.
LanguageEnglish
Pages363-378
Number of pages16
JournalTurkish Studies
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

governance
people's party
election research
evaluation
pluralism
opposition
election
justice
Military
regime
citizen
Consent
Voters
Governance
evidence
Elections
Evaluation
Republican
Justice
Nationalists

Keywords

  • democratic governance
  • voting
  • Turkey

Cite this

Rose, Richard. / Turkish voters and losers consent. In: Turkish Studies. 2008 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 363-378.
@article{1375f7b5de2c48759581be9d33ab2bd6,
title = "Turkish voters and losers consent",
abstract = "This paper tests four hypotheses of “losers’ consent”—that is, the extent to which evaluations of democratic governance are shared by citizens who voted for the Justice and Development Party (AKP), the winner at the 2007 Turkish elections, and those who voted for the opposition parties, the Republican People’s Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP). It uses survey data about governance evaluations from the 2007 Turkish Election Study. The evidence rejects the idea that losers withhold consent, creating polarized pluralism. It gives some support to a winner’s effect. It finds a substantial degree of similarity in views of governance across party lines. Differences between voters for the two losing parties are sometimes greater than differences with the AKP. Regardless of dissatisfaction with some features of governance, there is an overwhelming consensus rejecting a change of regime to military or Shari’a rule.",
keywords = "democratic governance , voting, Turkey",
author = "Richard Rose",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/14683840802012116",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "363--378",
journal = "Turkish Studies",
issn = "1468-3849",
number = "2",

}

Turkish voters and losers consent. / Rose, Richard.

In: Turkish Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2008, p. 363-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turkish voters and losers consent

AU - Rose, Richard

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This paper tests four hypotheses of “losers’ consent”—that is, the extent to which evaluations of democratic governance are shared by citizens who voted for the Justice and Development Party (AKP), the winner at the 2007 Turkish elections, and those who voted for the opposition parties, the Republican People’s Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP). It uses survey data about governance evaluations from the 2007 Turkish Election Study. The evidence rejects the idea that losers withhold consent, creating polarized pluralism. It gives some support to a winner’s effect. It finds a substantial degree of similarity in views of governance across party lines. Differences between voters for the two losing parties are sometimes greater than differences with the AKP. Regardless of dissatisfaction with some features of governance, there is an overwhelming consensus rejecting a change of regime to military or Shari’a rule.

AB - This paper tests four hypotheses of “losers’ consent”—that is, the extent to which evaluations of democratic governance are shared by citizens who voted for the Justice and Development Party (AKP), the winner at the 2007 Turkish elections, and those who voted for the opposition parties, the Republican People’s Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP). It uses survey data about governance evaluations from the 2007 Turkish Election Study. The evidence rejects the idea that losers withhold consent, creating polarized pluralism. It gives some support to a winner’s effect. It finds a substantial degree of similarity in views of governance across party lines. Differences between voters for the two losing parties are sometimes greater than differences with the AKP. Regardless of dissatisfaction with some features of governance, there is an overwhelming consensus rejecting a change of regime to military or Shari’a rule.

KW - democratic governance

KW - voting

KW - Turkey

U2 - 10.1080/14683840802012116

DO - 10.1080/14683840802012116

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 363

EP - 378

JO - Turkish Studies

T2 - Turkish Studies

JF - Turkish Studies

SN - 1468-3849

IS - 2

ER -