Trust and citizens' evaluations of promise keeping by governing parties

Robert Thomson, Heinz Brandenburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The principle that parties should make policy commitments during election campaigns and fulfil those commitments if elected is central to the idea of promissory representation. This study examines citizens’ evaluations of promise keeping and breaking. We focus on two aspects of trust as explanations of citizens’ evaluations. When trust is defined in terms of mistrust, it implies that vigilant and well-informed citizens base their evaluations on what governments deliver. When trust is defined in terms of distrust, it implies that citizens use heuristic thinking when evaluating governing parties’ performance, regardless of what those parties do. Our evidence is from a survey experiment in the British Election Study, which asked respondents to evaluate whether governing parties fulfilled specific election pledges made during the previous election campaign. The findings indicate that both mistrust and distrust affect citizens’ evaluations.
LanguageEnglish
Pages249–266
Number of pages18
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume67
Issue number1
Early online date19 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

citizen
evaluation
election campaign
commitment
election research
heuristics
election
experiment
performance
evidence

Keywords

  • election pledges
  • public opinion
  • trust
  • political knowledge

Cite this

@article{8572ea22408a44628e8cb61a48003920,
title = "Trust and citizens' evaluations of promise keeping by governing parties",
abstract = "The principle that parties should make policy commitments during election campaigns and fulfil those commitments if elected is central to the idea of promissory representation. This study examines citizens’ evaluations of promise keeping and breaking. We focus on two aspects of trust as explanations of citizens’ evaluations. When trust is defined in terms of mistrust, it implies that vigilant and well-informed citizens base their evaluations on what governments deliver. When trust is defined in terms of distrust, it implies that citizens use heuristic thinking when evaluating governing parties’ performance, regardless of what those parties do. Our evidence is from a survey experiment in the British Election Study, which asked respondents to evaluate whether governing parties fulfilled specific election pledges made during the previous election campaign. The findings indicate that both mistrust and distrust affect citizens’ evaluations.",
keywords = "election pledges, public opinion, trust , political knowledge",
author = "Robert Thomson and Heinz Brandenburg",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0032321718764177",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "249–266",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
number = "1",

}

Trust and citizens' evaluations of promise keeping by governing parties. / Thomson, Robert; Brandenburg, Heinz.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 67, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 249–266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust and citizens' evaluations of promise keeping by governing parties

AU - Thomson, Robert

AU - Brandenburg, Heinz

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - The principle that parties should make policy commitments during election campaigns and fulfil those commitments if elected is central to the idea of promissory representation. This study examines citizens’ evaluations of promise keeping and breaking. We focus on two aspects of trust as explanations of citizens’ evaluations. When trust is defined in terms of mistrust, it implies that vigilant and well-informed citizens base their evaluations on what governments deliver. When trust is defined in terms of distrust, it implies that citizens use heuristic thinking when evaluating governing parties’ performance, regardless of what those parties do. Our evidence is from a survey experiment in the British Election Study, which asked respondents to evaluate whether governing parties fulfilled specific election pledges made during the previous election campaign. The findings indicate that both mistrust and distrust affect citizens’ evaluations.

AB - The principle that parties should make policy commitments during election campaigns and fulfil those commitments if elected is central to the idea of promissory representation. This study examines citizens’ evaluations of promise keeping and breaking. We focus on two aspects of trust as explanations of citizens’ evaluations. When trust is defined in terms of mistrust, it implies that vigilant and well-informed citizens base their evaluations on what governments deliver. When trust is defined in terms of distrust, it implies that citizens use heuristic thinking when evaluating governing parties’ performance, regardless of what those parties do. Our evidence is from a survey experiment in the British Election Study, which asked respondents to evaluate whether governing parties fulfilled specific election pledges made during the previous election campaign. The findings indicate that both mistrust and distrust affect citizens’ evaluations.

KW - election pledges

KW - public opinion

KW - trust

KW - political knowledge

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/home/psx

U2 - 10.1177/0032321718764177

DO - 10.1177/0032321718764177

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 249

EP - 266

JO - Political Studies

T2 - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 1

ER -