Abstract
Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is, rightly, receiving increasing attention in Health Technology Assessment. However, a distinguishing feature of the health domain is that technologies must actually improve health, and good performance on other criteria cannot compensate for failure to do so. We argue for two reasonable tests for MCDA models: the treacle test (can a winning intervention be incompletely ineffective?) and the smallpox test (can a winning intervention be for a disease which no one suffers from?). We explore why models might fail such tests (as the models of some existing published studies would do) and offer some suggestions as to how practice should be improved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 512-515 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Value in Health |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 20 Dec 2016 |
Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 2017 |
Keywords
- multicriteria decision analysis
- health technology assessment
- health improvement
- decision making framework