Transparency requirements in the course of a legislative procedure

Council v. Access Info Europe

Stephen Lea, Paul James Cardwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Can the identity of EU Member States be hidden from public view during the legislative process? In this judgment, the Court of Justice had the opportunity to consider and clarify the extent of the transparency duty imposed by Regulation 1049/2001, 1 where the centralized institutions are acting in their legislative capacity. The appeal, brought by the Council against the decision of the General Court of 22 March 2011 2 posed the question of whether, under Article 4(3) of the Regulation, 3 the Council could refuse access to those parts of Council documents that disclosed the identity of Member States, who had submitted proposals that sought to amend draft Commission legislation. Specifically, the Commission legislation at issue was a proposal to recast Regulation 1049/2001 itself.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-80
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Public Law
Volume21
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

transparency
regulation
legislation
court of justice
EU member state
appeal

Keywords

  • EU member states
  • legislative processes
  • EU integration

Cite this

@article{110e4a6a261b458da116666088394b4b,
title = "Transparency requirements in the course of a legislative procedure: Council v. Access Info Europe",
abstract = "Can the identity of EU Member States be hidden from public view during the legislative process? In this judgment, the Court of Justice had the opportunity to consider and clarify the extent of the transparency duty imposed by Regulation 1049/2001, 1 where the centralized institutions are acting in their legislative capacity. The appeal, brought by the Council against the decision of the General Court of 22 March 2011 2 posed the question of whether, under Article 4(3) of the Regulation, 3 the Council could refuse access to those parts of Council documents that disclosed the identity of Member States, who had submitted proposals that sought to amend draft Commission legislation. Specifically, the Commission legislation at issue was a proposal to recast Regulation 1049/2001 itself.",
keywords = "EU member states, legislative processes, EU integration",
author = "Stephen Lea and Cardwell, {Paul James}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "61--80",
journal = "European Public Law",
issn = "1354-3725",
number = "1",

}

Transparency requirements in the course of a legislative procedure : Council v. Access Info Europe. / Lea, Stephen; Cardwell, Paul James.

In: European Public Law, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.07.2015, p. 61-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transparency requirements in the course of a legislative procedure

T2 - Council v. Access Info Europe

AU - Lea, Stephen

AU - Cardwell, Paul James

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - Can the identity of EU Member States be hidden from public view during the legislative process? In this judgment, the Court of Justice had the opportunity to consider and clarify the extent of the transparency duty imposed by Regulation 1049/2001, 1 where the centralized institutions are acting in their legislative capacity. The appeal, brought by the Council against the decision of the General Court of 22 March 2011 2 posed the question of whether, under Article 4(3) of the Regulation, 3 the Council could refuse access to those parts of Council documents that disclosed the identity of Member States, who had submitted proposals that sought to amend draft Commission legislation. Specifically, the Commission legislation at issue was a proposal to recast Regulation 1049/2001 itself.

AB - Can the identity of EU Member States be hidden from public view during the legislative process? In this judgment, the Court of Justice had the opportunity to consider and clarify the extent of the transparency duty imposed by Regulation 1049/2001, 1 where the centralized institutions are acting in their legislative capacity. The appeal, brought by the Council against the decision of the General Court of 22 March 2011 2 posed the question of whether, under Article 4(3) of the Regulation, 3 the Council could refuse access to those parts of Council documents that disclosed the identity of Member States, who had submitted proposals that sought to amend draft Commission legislation. Specifically, the Commission legislation at issue was a proposal to recast Regulation 1049/2001 itself.

KW - EU member states

KW - legislative processes

KW - EU integration

UR - http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2015004

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 61

EP - 80

JO - European Public Law

JF - European Public Law

SN - 1354-3725

IS - 1

ER -