Transferring simulation from specialists into design practice

I. Macdonald, L.B. McElroy, Jon Hand, Joseph Andrew Clarke

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Building simulation tools (energy, lighting, plant simulation, CFD, etc) have long been the preserve of a few specialist consultancies rather than being used where they can have the greatest impact - by construction design practices. This has resulted in additional costs for designers (time and financial) in terms of buying in specialist services. In addition, the designer is not able to fully explore the design potential: being restricted by what the specialist reports back. There are myriad well-recognised reasons for this situation: the perceived difficulty of using simulation tools; the cost (licences, suitably trained staff, hardware); liability issues; and so on. Also, the construction industry is a traditionally a poor investor in research and development, preferring to operate core business activities on proven ground. Despite this, IBPSA Scotland has, over the last three years, succeeded in transferring simulation capabilities into local businesses, primarily in the building services sector. This has resulted in enhanced design quality, and (more importantly) increased business for participating companies. This begs the question: why, despite these barriers, have these companies succeeded? This paper explores the technology transfer mechanisms and details which have been successful and which have not. In both cases, reasons for success and failure are identified and analysed. The paper goes on to describe how this knowledge has been used to guide the future plans of IBPSA Scotland, including widening appeal within the design team, and targeting architects in particular through a new Scottish Executive initiative.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2005
Event9th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference - Montreal, Canada
Duration: 15 Aug 200518 Aug 2005

Conference

Conference9th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference
CityMontreal, Canada
Period15/08/0518/08/05

Fingerprint

Industry
Technology transfer
Construction industry
Costs
Computational fluid dynamics
Lighting
Hardware

Keywords

  • building design
  • building simulation tools

Cite this

Macdonald, I., McElroy, L. B., Hand, J., & Clarke, J. A. (2005). Transferring simulation from specialists into design practice. Paper presented at 9th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference, Montreal, Canada, .
Macdonald, I. ; McElroy, L.B. ; Hand, Jon ; Clarke, Joseph Andrew. / Transferring simulation from specialists into design practice. Paper presented at 9th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference, Montreal, Canada, .6 p.
@conference{e032afc646e64950aaa27517298e487c,
title = "Transferring simulation from specialists into design practice",
abstract = "Building simulation tools (energy, lighting, plant simulation, CFD, etc) have long been the preserve of a few specialist consultancies rather than being used where they can have the greatest impact - by construction design practices. This has resulted in additional costs for designers (time and financial) in terms of buying in specialist services. In addition, the designer is not able to fully explore the design potential: being restricted by what the specialist reports back. There are myriad well-recognised reasons for this situation: the perceived difficulty of using simulation tools; the cost (licences, suitably trained staff, hardware); liability issues; and so on. Also, the construction industry is a traditionally a poor investor in research and development, preferring to operate core business activities on proven ground. Despite this, IBPSA Scotland has, over the last three years, succeeded in transferring simulation capabilities into local businesses, primarily in the building services sector. This has resulted in enhanced design quality, and (more importantly) increased business for participating companies. This begs the question: why, despite these barriers, have these companies succeeded? This paper explores the technology transfer mechanisms and details which have been successful and which have not. In both cases, reasons for success and failure are identified and analysed. The paper goes on to describe how this knowledge has been used to guide the future plans of IBPSA Scotland, including widening appeal within the design team, and targeting architects in particular through a new Scottish Executive initiative.",
keywords = "building design, building simulation tools",
author = "I. Macdonald and L.B. McElroy and Jon Hand and Clarke, {Joseph Andrew}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
language = "English",
note = "9th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference ; Conference date: 15-08-2005 Through 18-08-2005",

}

Macdonald, I, McElroy, LB, Hand, J & Clarke, JA 2005, 'Transferring simulation from specialists into design practice' Paper presented at 9th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference, Montreal, Canada, 15/08/05 - 18/08/05, .

Transferring simulation from specialists into design practice. / Macdonald, I.; McElroy, L.B.; Hand, Jon; Clarke, Joseph Andrew.

2005. Paper presented at 9th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference, Montreal, Canada, .

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Transferring simulation from specialists into design practice

AU - Macdonald, I.

AU - McElroy, L.B.

AU - Hand, Jon

AU - Clarke, Joseph Andrew

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Building simulation tools (energy, lighting, plant simulation, CFD, etc) have long been the preserve of a few specialist consultancies rather than being used where they can have the greatest impact - by construction design practices. This has resulted in additional costs for designers (time and financial) in terms of buying in specialist services. In addition, the designer is not able to fully explore the design potential: being restricted by what the specialist reports back. There are myriad well-recognised reasons for this situation: the perceived difficulty of using simulation tools; the cost (licences, suitably trained staff, hardware); liability issues; and so on. Also, the construction industry is a traditionally a poor investor in research and development, preferring to operate core business activities on proven ground. Despite this, IBPSA Scotland has, over the last three years, succeeded in transferring simulation capabilities into local businesses, primarily in the building services sector. This has resulted in enhanced design quality, and (more importantly) increased business for participating companies. This begs the question: why, despite these barriers, have these companies succeeded? This paper explores the technology transfer mechanisms and details which have been successful and which have not. In both cases, reasons for success and failure are identified and analysed. The paper goes on to describe how this knowledge has been used to guide the future plans of IBPSA Scotland, including widening appeal within the design team, and targeting architects in particular through a new Scottish Executive initiative.

AB - Building simulation tools (energy, lighting, plant simulation, CFD, etc) have long been the preserve of a few specialist consultancies rather than being used where they can have the greatest impact - by construction design practices. This has resulted in additional costs for designers (time and financial) in terms of buying in specialist services. In addition, the designer is not able to fully explore the design potential: being restricted by what the specialist reports back. There are myriad well-recognised reasons for this situation: the perceived difficulty of using simulation tools; the cost (licences, suitably trained staff, hardware); liability issues; and so on. Also, the construction industry is a traditionally a poor investor in research and development, preferring to operate core business activities on proven ground. Despite this, IBPSA Scotland has, over the last three years, succeeded in transferring simulation capabilities into local businesses, primarily in the building services sector. This has resulted in enhanced design quality, and (more importantly) increased business for participating companies. This begs the question: why, despite these barriers, have these companies succeeded? This paper explores the technology transfer mechanisms and details which have been successful and which have not. In both cases, reasons for success and failure are identified and analysed. The paper goes on to describe how this knowledge has been used to guide the future plans of IBPSA Scotland, including widening appeal within the design team, and targeting architects in particular through a new Scottish Executive initiative.

KW - building design

KW - building simulation tools

UR - http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BS2005/BS05_0657_662.pdf

UR - http://www.ibpsa.ca/bs2005/

M3 - Paper

ER -

Macdonald I, McElroy LB, Hand J, Clarke JA. Transferring simulation from specialists into design practice. 2005. Paper presented at 9th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference, Montreal, Canada, .