Transfer agents, knowledge authority, and indices of regulatory quality: a comparative analysis of the world bank and the organisation for economic co-operation and development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the past two decades, international organizations have been designing and promoting transnational benchmarks for evaluating the quality of governance. The World Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development have been competing in devising and legitimizing indices across policy areas. Previous studies have demonstrated how international organizations can influence national governments by means of governance indices. However, a comparative analysis is still missing of the choices international organizations have made in establishing their own indices of good governance. By focusing on regulatory reform, this paper attempts to fill this gap. It first sets a framework to compare the different types of authority that organizations can pursue through benchmarking. It then applies this framework to the specific case of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the World Bank, to examine how they differ in their conceptions of and use of policy benchmarking.
LanguageEnglish
Pages350-365
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis
Volume18
Issue number4
Early online date30 Apr 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Fingerprint

International Organizations
World Bank
OECD
benchmarking
governance
policy area
good governance
reform

Keywords

  • good governance
  • international organizations
  • policy benchmarking
  • regulation
  • transnational governance

Cite this

@article{7c9c84854dd840729a8bc08c40515b7a,
title = "Transfer agents, knowledge authority, and indices of regulatory quality: a comparative analysis of the world bank and the organisation for economic co-operation and development",
abstract = "In the past two decades, international organizations have been designing and promoting transnational benchmarks for evaluating the quality of governance. The World Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development have been competing in devising and legitimizing indices across policy areas. Previous studies have demonstrated how international organizations can influence national governments by means of governance indices. However, a comparative analysis is still missing of the choices international organizations have made in establishing their own indices of good governance. By focusing on regulatory reform, this paper attempts to fill this gap. It first sets a framework to compare the different types of authority that organizations can pursue through benchmarking. It then applies this framework to the specific case of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the World Bank, to examine how they differ in their conceptions of and use of policy benchmarking.",
keywords = "good governance, international organizations, policy benchmarking, regulation, transnational governance",
author = "{De Francesco}, Fabrizio",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/13876988.2014.882648",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "350--365",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis",
issn = "1387-6988",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transfer agents, knowledge authority, and indices of regulatory quality

T2 - Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis

AU - De Francesco, Fabrizio

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - In the past two decades, international organizations have been designing and promoting transnational benchmarks for evaluating the quality of governance. The World Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development have been competing in devising and legitimizing indices across policy areas. Previous studies have demonstrated how international organizations can influence national governments by means of governance indices. However, a comparative analysis is still missing of the choices international organizations have made in establishing their own indices of good governance. By focusing on regulatory reform, this paper attempts to fill this gap. It first sets a framework to compare the different types of authority that organizations can pursue through benchmarking. It then applies this framework to the specific case of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the World Bank, to examine how they differ in their conceptions of and use of policy benchmarking.

AB - In the past two decades, international organizations have been designing and promoting transnational benchmarks for evaluating the quality of governance. The World Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development have been competing in devising and legitimizing indices across policy areas. Previous studies have demonstrated how international organizations can influence national governments by means of governance indices. However, a comparative analysis is still missing of the choices international organizations have made in establishing their own indices of good governance. By focusing on regulatory reform, this paper attempts to fill this gap. It first sets a framework to compare the different types of authority that organizations can pursue through benchmarking. It then applies this framework to the specific case of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the World Bank, to examine how they differ in their conceptions of and use of policy benchmarking.

KW - good governance

KW - international organizations

KW - policy benchmarking

KW - regulation

KW - transnational governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899469226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13876988.2014.882648

DO - 10.1080/13876988.2014.882648

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 350

EP - 365

JO - Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis

JF - Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis

SN - 1387-6988

IS - 4

ER -